The Destruction of Conscience in the National Academy of Sciences
February 26, 2013
An Interview With Marshall Sahlins
The Destruction of Conscience in the National Academy of Sciences
by DAVID H. PRICE
Last Friday, esteemed University of Chicago anthropologist Marshall Sahlins formally resigned from the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), the United States most prestigious scientific society.
Sahlins states that he resigned because of his objections to the election of [Napoleon] Chagnon, and to the military research projects of the Academy. Sahlins was elected to the National Academy of Sciences in 1991. He issued the below statement explaining his resignation:
By the evidence of his own writings as well as the testimony of others, including Amazonian peoples and professional scholars of the region, Chagnon has done serious harm to the indigenous communities among whom he did research. At the same time, his scientific claims about human evolution and the genetic selection for male violenceas in the notorious study he published in 1988 in Sciencehave proven to be shallow and baseless, much to the discredit of the anthropological discipline. At best, his election to the NAS was a large moral and intellectual blunder on the part of members of the Academy. So much so that my own participation in the Academy has become an embarrassment.
Nor do I wish to be a party to the aid, comfort, and support the NAS is giving to social science research on improving the combat performance of the US military, given the toll that military has taken on the blood, treasure, and happiness of American people, and the suffering it has imposed on other peoples in the unnecessary wars of this century. I believe that the NAS, if it involves itself at all in related research, should be studying how to promote peace, not how to make war.
Napoleon Chagnon rose to fame after his fieldwork among the Yanomami (also known as Yanomamo) in the rainforests of northeastern South Americas Orinoco Basin in the 1960s and 70s. He wrote a bestselling ethnography used in introductory anthropology classes around the world, describing the Yanomami as the fierce people because of the high levels of intra- and inter-group warfare observed during his fieldwork, warfare that he would describe as innate and as representing humankind in some sort of imagined natural state.
More:
http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/02/26/the-destruction-of-conscience-in-national-academy-of-sciences/