Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,415 posts)
Sun Oct 24, 2021, 07:18 AM Oct 2021

Possible oldest prehistoric art ever known is discovered by Chinese scientists in the 'roof of the w

Michelle De Pacina
1 day ago



Dr. David Zhang and his team of scientists’ discovery of handprints and footprints are being debated over as to whether they are the world’s oldest prehistoric art.

Fossils on the travertine rock: Dr. David Zhang, a scientist from Guangdong, China, found impressions of handprints and footprints on a travertine rock with his research team in Quesang on the Tibetan Plateau in Oct. 2018, reported Time.


  • Zhang, the lead researcher from Guangzhou University, plans to appeal to the Tibetan government to conserve his discovery as it “may be the oldest prehistoric art ever recorded and the earliest evidence of human life in the region.”

  • According to Zhang’s team, whose findings were published in Science Bulletin, the tracks are between 169,000 and 226,000 years old, dating back to the Earth’s last ice age. Currently, the world’s oldest known art is estimated to be around 40,000 years old.

  • They believe the impressions may have been made by children aged 7 and 12.

  • Zhang’s findings date older than the earliest known human occupation of the Tibetan Plateau — nicknamed the “Roof of the World” — and it could provide insight into human evolution.
More:
https://nextshark.com/chinese-scientists-discover-worlds-oldest-art/
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Possible oldest prehistoric art ever known is discovered by Chinese scientists in the 'roof of the w (Original Post) Judi Lynn Oct 2021 OP
Remarkably long fingers and less opposable thumb bucolic_frolic Oct 2021 #1
You're right. The fingers particularly are abnormally long. 70sEraVet Oct 2021 #4
Reading this gave me goosebumps. BlancheSplanchnik Oct 2021 #2
In the linked article ... left-of-center2012 Oct 2021 #3
Erectus, Denisovan or Neandertal perhaps? paleotn Oct 2021 #5
I could accept children's art tavernier Oct 2021 #6
looks better than my art joe_stampingbull Oct 2021 #7

70sEraVet

(3,471 posts)
4. You're right. The fingers particularly are abnormally long.
Sun Oct 24, 2021, 08:59 AM
Oct 2021

Yet it is suggested that they were made by children?
Perhaps they were made by humans, just not of the Sapiens branch?

left-of-center2012

(34,195 posts)
3. In the linked article ...
Sun Oct 24, 2021, 08:53 AM
Oct 2021

There is at least one person who questions whether handprints and footprints constitute art.
I tend to agree that it is at least questionable.

Nevertheless the discovery of these ancient markings is remarkable.

Thanks for sharing.

paleotn

(17,870 posts)
5. Erectus, Denisovan or Neandertal perhaps?
Sun Oct 24, 2021, 09:04 AM
Oct 2021

Sapiens were still in Africa at that time. At least there's no other evidence of sapiens outside of Africa until 90 to 120K years ago, and that was way west in the Levant. Then again, absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence. Like when did the first humans reach the western hemisphere, there's soooo much we don't know about our own ancestors and our cousins.

tavernier

(12,364 posts)
6. I could accept children's art
Sun Oct 24, 2021, 09:35 AM
Oct 2021

or at least a game amongst friends or siblings comparing each other’s hand imprints, as opposed to random prints without intent.

Fun to imagine scenarios of the intent of this “game”…
Hey mom, look what we made!

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Anthropology»Possible oldest prehistor...