Atheists & Agnostics
Related: About this forumDeepak Chopra Issues $1 Million Prize Challenge to Richard Dawkins, New Atheists...
wait for it....
...to Explain Biological Basis for Ideas
http://global.christianpost.com/news/deepak-chopra-issues-1-million-prize-challenge-to-richard-dawkins-new-atheists-to-explain-biological-basis-for-ideas-123368/
Addressing what he called a "tribe of militant new atheists," naming Dawkins, James Randi, and Daniel Dennett, Chopra announced the challenge in a video uploaded on Youtube earlier this week.
"Can you please offer a scientific understanding for the biological basis of a first-person experience? Any experience mental experience, or perceptual experience. So for cognition, or for perception. And I'll even make it more simple. Can you offer a scientific understanding for the biological basis of an idea, a thought?" Chopra asks in the video.
"Just tell me how does electrochemistry produce a thought, an idea, and you get the million dollars. I will live up to this. But it has to be a valid, scientific explanation for the biological basis of an idea."
CHECK FREAKING MATE, ATHEISTS! LOL
JoeyT
(6,785 posts)They stem from the synergistic pattern of synapse quantum entanglement, effecting awareness patterns on a macro level.
Hey Chopra, where's my million bucks, fucker?
DetlefK
(16,423 posts)AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)I LOVE it!
It's so scientific-y and groovy at the same time!
And to appropriate a Dennett reducto ad absurdum about a similar claim....
If you had a severed hand.... wouldn't the synergistic pattern of synapse quantum entanglement of the neurons in the nerves of that hand create thoughts? Like "Shit....where'd the rest of the body go? Hello? HELLO?"
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)Where's the money, Lebowski?
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Problem solved, pay me motherfucker.
edhopper
(33,554 posts)It might be the symbiotic organism in your stomach. So it might not even be your idea.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)How thoughts become experience and what that means is the hard part. But so what? Does Deepak think he has a point? Hard problems of consciousness are something we haven't figured out yet. Oh I see, therefore "god".
djean111
(14,255 posts)DetlefK
(16,423 posts)1. Take a software simulating a neural network.
2. Make sure, the network has feedback-loops.
3. Add random noise to the fuzzy-logic transfer-function. (Forgot the actual name. The distribution-function that decides how strong a signal is passed on from one neuron to the next.)
4. Noise + amplifying feedback -> signal where no signal should be -> idea
Where does the noise come from? Local chemical imbalance, thermal electric noise...
Sketching it out and writing down the calculations is a matter of hours. If you know your way around this particular discipline of IT, actually programming this could be done within a few days and weeks.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)just highlights that his offer has never been answered by them.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Where is his scientific evidence?
Curmudgeoness
(18,219 posts)We have more proof of how the brain works than we do for the existence of god.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)I'm sure scientists and philosophers will continue to work on the problem with rigor, logic, and understanding without your challenge. And they STILL won't fall for or give credence to your loopy claptrap.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Your random fictional Deepak Chopra quote:
"Love is the womb of formless belonging"
http://www.wisdomofchopra.com
arcane1
(38,613 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Sometimes it's like Christmas morning!
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)Sounds like every response you'll get in the other place.
also: Pure internet gold. I'd award you the internet, but I have been informed that it is not my place to do so, so I shall not be so humbled as to infer that I may impart some, or all of the majesteys of which in therfore we believe that our faiths unquestioningly belong to hitherfor due to quantum phalanges wherein the spirit passes.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,295 posts)"Perception is rooted in subjective facts"
"Our consciousness transforms the light of timelessness"
Damn, are you sure these aren't just from his archive?
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I found that gem in the comments at http://www.thinkatheist.com/video/richard-dawkins-deepak-chopra-english-2013-dangerous-ideas re: Dawkins vs Chopra circa 2013.
From Deepak Chopra's actual statements in this debate:
"All belief is a cover up for insecurity."
"Biological organisms are purpose driven."
"There is a deeper consciousness that throws out this universe at the speed of light."
"Awareness is a singularity, perceptual experiences are many, and the evolution of species is actually the evolution of consciousness to express itself."
"We are the eyes of the universe looking at itself."
From the Deepak Chopra random woo-woo generator:
"Knowledge grows through the expansion of facts."
"The human nervous system gives rise to universal human observation."
"Quantum physics is rooted in new potentiality."
"Death shapes exponential experiences."
"Your body regulates total excellence."
"Your consciousness illuminates intrinsic energy."
For hours of fun, keep hitting the generator button, then string the output together to construct your own Deepak Chopra debate thesis, best-selling book, or scholarly paper!
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)"We are a way for the cosmos to know itself. -Carl Sagan, out of context. Me thinks Chopra has just a bit of plagiarism, with just enough exestintalistic filter to avoid a lawsuit.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)You are probably right.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)The surface of the Earth is the shore of the cosmic ocean. On this shore, we've learned most of what we know. Recently, we've waded a little way out, maybe ankle-deep, and the water seems inviting. Some part of our being knows this is where we came from. We long to return, and we can, because the cosmos is also within us. We're made of star stuff. We are a way for the cosmos to know itself.
He's imparting knowledge that, for most folks, would take years of higher education to just get the basics down (which is the problem with a lot of the big atheist types) so he's turning it into poetry so it's also beautiful and memorable, as well as something said by a person who actually knows wtf he's talking about.
This line stuck out to me because I have this song on my mp3 player:
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Nailed it.
I love the sound of Carl Sagan's voice, I have the Original Cosmos series on our DVR and use it a refuge.
progressoid
(49,964 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Completely instinctual.
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)defacto7
(13,485 posts)to provide a scientific explanation for a non-biological basis of thoughts and ideas. Only facts please.
Curmudgeoness
(18,219 posts)the great thinkers believed that mental illness was just demon possession. And there were times when it was scientific certainty that illnesses came from the air. I am not sure what he wants that we cannot explain, or what his point is here, but just because we do not have all the answers yet doesn't mean that they are not there....waiting for us to figure them out.
edhopper
(33,554 posts)Some external etherial other realm.
How could simple humans develop ideas for themselves.
It must come from the cosmic God thingie.
progressoid
(49,964 posts)AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)He's the guru of "scientism"..... or something.....
Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)You didn't know that?????
I hate the fact that woo-woo spreaders like Sixpak Chopsockie take the ideas of subatomic physics and misuse those concepts.
Since I live with a person who tells me all about quarks and speaks in equations, this misuse of physics pisses me off.
Buzzwords. Nuthin' but buzzwords!!
Gore1FL
(21,126 posts)onager
(9,356 posts)...on CNBC.
Nothing about Chop-Shop, but deals with one of his fellow-travelers - JZ Knight, the con artist who channels the 35,000 year old warrior Ramtha. And who, thanks to copious amounts of plastic surgery, currently looks about 35,000 years old her damn self.
Don't want to give too much away, but this is one amazing clusterfuck of a story. Knight and Ram-Tha-Lam-Tha-Ding-Dong got the attention of an Ascended Spiritual Master and chiropractor, Lou Souterio.
Souterio used his chiroprac to magically heal the wife of a Vermont entertainer named Mac Parker. When boring old conventional doctors hadn't been able to help her! I think it was the Therapeutic Touch that did the trick.
And $28 million dollars of stolen money later...
Among many other Magickal Powers, Mr. Souterio claimed he would eventually be able to time-travel and get winning lottery numbers in advance.
He also claimed he could walk thru walls. And he will have plenty of time to hone that skill for the next 7 years, which he will be spending behind the walls of a prison.
progressoid
(49,964 posts)Emma Stone on Letterman last night telling about her dead Grandfather leaving quarters (yes, 25 cents) for her.
https://tv.yahoo.com/video/david-letterman-emma-stones-supernatural-223551118-cbs.html
onager
(9,356 posts)The Tooth Fairy must have been busy...
ALERT: Scanning the TV channels, I see that tomorrow, 7/19, Lifetime Movie Network is running a marathon of "haunted" shows. Including "The Haunting Of..."
Vince Neil and Wayne Newton.
Also starring psychic medium Kim Russo!1!
Hey Lifetime - I guarantee to watch forever AND start worshipping the Dark Spirits. If you just run a show where Russo is, on-screen in real time, grabbed by Cthulthu and dragged off to stand trial before the Old Ones. For the crime of being a fraudulent annoying asshole.
Sort of like the Mom character in the movie "Rapture-Palooza." Who does indeed get raptured up to Heaven to spend eternity with Jesus..but gets sent back to earth for "being annoying."
deucemagnet
(4,549 posts)First Laura Prepon becomes a Scientologist, now this. I might be running out of beautiful young redheads to lust after.
progressoid
(49,964 posts)Prepon has been a scientologist since 99. That's sad.
djean111
(14,255 posts)his challenge has no basis in fact, just belief and assumption.