Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
First we are told to shut up. (Original Post) Warren Stupidity Jul 2014 OP
Well, in a way, this is a discussions for those people who go by their book Warpy Jul 2014 #1
You can be ethical and not situational. Warren Stupidity Jul 2014 #4
There you go: mr blur Jul 2014 #2
That thread is now my all time fav religion thread. Warren Stupidity Jul 2014 #3
It is truly one for the ages, trotsky Jul 2014 #6
To me the real irony is... theHandpuppet Jul 2014 #15
I was Juror 3. Gore1FL Jul 2014 #5
Seems only one atheist on the jury... rexcat Jul 2014 #7
I reread it and came ot the same conclusion as I did originally Gore1FL Jul 2014 #8
For one I didn't know your religious beliefz or lack of... rexcat Jul 2014 #9
If you don't know or care about my (lack of) religious beliefs why did you make the statement? Gore1FL Jul 2014 #11
No, you missed the point of the OP, I'm afraid. mr blur Jul 2014 #12
I've spent time in there. Gore1FL Jul 2014 #21
Something else Garry Wills said... onager Jul 2014 #10
Um... you aren't foolin' me, are you? theHandpuppet Jul 2014 #13
Yes, Virginia, Billy Graham is at least a first cousin to Jebus... onager Jul 2014 #18
I see. theHandpuppet Jul 2014 #19
Just wanted to add... theHandpuppet Jul 2014 #22
In the OP's Defense LostOne4Ever Jul 2014 #14
I have started a few threads edhopper Jul 2014 #17
I agree with you totally LostOne4Ever Jul 2014 #20
I especially enjoy that DetlefK was apparently just dropping one off in the punchbowl. AtheistCrusader Jul 2014 #16

Warpy

(111,152 posts)
1. Well, in a way, this is a discussions for those people who go by their book
Tue Jul 29, 2014, 02:34 PM
Jul 2014

which lays out rigid rules for conduct without realizing there might be many exceptions to those rules depending on the situation.

We atheists are ethical rather than moral, fully recognizing different situations call for different behavior.

Let the rigid legalists continue their search for loopholes in that book in peace.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
3. That thread is now my all time fav religion thread.
Tue Jul 29, 2014, 03:23 PM
Jul 2014

It just sums up the massive dishonesty over there, all in one grand splooge of idiocy.

theHandpuppet

(19,964 posts)
15. To me the real irony is...
Tue Jul 29, 2014, 06:37 PM
Jul 2014

... that particular thread was started by someone who admitted to lying about his DU profile. Or should I have said, exaggerated?

Gore1FL

(21,100 posts)
5. I was Juror 3.
Tue Jul 29, 2014, 04:12 PM
Jul 2014

If you read the post, he agreed in advance that "religion is one big lie yaddayaddayadda," but that wasn't the topic being discussed. "Shut up" shouldn't have been used, but implying that Atheists were actually told to be silent in general as implied in this OP is intellectually dishonest.



On Tue Jul 29, 2014, 02:36 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

Question about lying.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1218143436

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

For the atheists: No, I'm not talking about how religion is one big lie yaddayaddayadda. Shut up. I mean a real-life declaration about something like tricking pagans in negotiations or willfully telling children a lie and revealing it to them later when they are adult.

Really? "Shut Up"? How about you go take a flying fuck at the moon?

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue Jul 29, 2014, 02:49 PM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Religion. Anything seems to go in this group.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: As I read it, "Shut Up" meant "Don't misconstrue this point and start useless off-topic sub-threads." Even if it didn't, "shut up" doesn't rise to the level of hide.


Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Don't tell me to shut up!
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Even though I'm an atheist and the op told me to shut up, I understand the question he wants to address, I think. It seems to me to be the veracity of people, not the scriptures, that he is questioning. He could have been, maybe, a little more diplomatic, but he defined the parameters of his discussion. I'm ok with that.

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

rexcat

(3,622 posts)
7. Seems only one atheist on the jury...
Tue Jul 29, 2014, 05:00 PM
Jul 2014

In my opinion you misread the OP and the jury overall doesn't give
cow feces about rude behavior.

As they say in the South "bless your little heart."


Gore1FL

(21,100 posts)
8. I reread it and came ot the same conclusion as I did originally
Tue Jul 29, 2014, 05:11 PM
Jul 2014

The OP points out that religion gives rationalized reasons to sin based on self interest and would like to discuss that specific aspect rather than "all religion sucks."

Somehow that revokes my atheist card in your eyes. Whatever. My atheism has to do with my non-belief in God and is not measurable by opinions expressed on an internet chat board It's odd that you would challenge it. It's even more odd that you would say "bless your little heart" as a finishing piece of (failed) condescension.

Have a nice day.

rexcat

(3,622 posts)
9. For one I didn't know your religious beliefz or lack of...
Tue Jul 29, 2014, 05:26 PM
Jul 2014

And don't really care. I still think the jury got it wrong.

I think the jury was rather d.....h about the whole matter. As far as my bless your little heart thing it beats what I really wanted to say but I was trying not to get your underwear in a wad and alerting on my post.

Gore1FL

(21,100 posts)
11. If you don't know or care about my (lack of) religious beliefs why did you make the statement?
Tue Jul 29, 2014, 05:56 PM
Jul 2014

Your words contradict your actions. I don't know what d....h means. Death, depth, ditch, doeth, dough, dunch, and dutch don't seem to fit and I really don't want to do an exhaustive dictionary search.

I don't alert. You don't need to worry. I'm a big boy who can take whatever it is you want to say. If you are wrong, I will happily point it out, however.



 

mr blur

(7,753 posts)
12. No, you missed the point of the OP, I'm afraid.
Tue Jul 29, 2014, 06:08 PM
Jul 2014

Perhaps you haven't spent enough time in there to appreciate how the little cabal of mutual arse-licking works.

Gore1FL

(21,100 posts)
21. I've spent time in there.
Tue Jul 29, 2014, 11:31 PM
Jul 2014

But I can also read what was written. The post was specifically about lies and dubious rule exceptions made by religion to manipulate people.

I find that difficult to to rationalize as a pro-religion topic.

The "Shut up atheists" comment was clearly a poor choice of phrasing. Because instead of reading onward for the point, many replied in outrage. It would have been better if he said something along the lines of, "Please spare us the obvious "religion itself is a lie" posts. That's not what I am trying to discuss." He didn't.

There are plenty of things to be outraged by in the religion thread. You don't have to misread posts to find them.

onager

(9,356 posts)
10. Something else Garry Wills said...
Tue Jul 29, 2014, 05:55 PM
Jul 2014

Wills described the cozy relationship between Richard Nixon and Billy Graham as "an alliance of moral dwarfs." That's quoted in William Martin's biography of Saint Billy, "Prophet With Honor: The Billy Graham Story."

I couldn't find this quote, but I'm pretty sure it was Wills who once said of Graham: "By dint of hard work and perseverance, Billy Graham has managed to make himself the thinking man's Easter Bunny."

In the Other Group, considering how much Graham is fawned over as the "gold standard" in evangelists, those quotes would draw a lot of concerned frowns and tut-tutting. And probably a 5000-word screed from the Adult-In-Charge, some of which he may have even written himself. Well, the punctuation anyway.

theHandpuppet

(19,964 posts)
13. Um... you aren't foolin' me, are you?
Tue Jul 29, 2014, 06:15 PM
Jul 2014

There are actually people on DU who fawn over the Grahams? Please say it ain't so.

onager

(9,356 posts)
18. Yes, Virginia, Billy Graham is at least a first cousin to Jebus...
Tue Jul 29, 2014, 07:41 PM
Jul 2014

You can probably find some of the posts lauding Graham just by using the DU Search function.

My take: just about every time someone criticizes Billy Grab'em in the Religion group, lots of people pop up to say he's a lifelong Democrat. And make the usual statements about how he's the Gold Standard in honest, apolitical evangelists. This is usually in comparison to the Robertsons and Falwells.

But Graham has a LONG record of sucking up to the Repubs, going back to Eisenhower. Billy's close ties to Nixon are well known, and the famous White House tapes even caught the two of them swapping anti-Semitic remarks.

in 1976 Graham supported Gerald Ford, despite Jimmy Carter's well-known Evangelical religious beliefs. Carter's sister was an evangelist herself, so maybe Graham just didn't like the competition.

2000 was even worse. Graham appeared on stage and did his usual coy BS about how he couldn't openly support a specific candidate.

Then Mr. & Mrs. GW Bush joined him. Graham talked about Shrub being a "fine young man" and made it clear he intended to vote for him. That video clip used to be floating around the Internet and still may be. I didn't check.

So whenever somebody started propagandizing for Graham on DU, I would usually mention this stuff (to little effect). As a kid I was often forced to sit thru his damn "Crusades," since I grew up in the South among people who REALLY idolized him.

To borrow a comparison from those times, I always thought he was nothing more than the Eddie Haskell of evangelists.

theHandpuppet

(19,964 posts)
19. I see.
Tue Jul 29, 2014, 08:10 PM
Jul 2014

So being a raging misogynist and homophobe doesn't disqualify him from adulation. For a moment I forgot this was DU, the inspiration for the "religious liberty" clause.

LostOne4Ever

(9,286 posts)
14. In the OP's Defense
Tue Jul 29, 2014, 06:27 PM
Jul 2014

That sounds like slang you hear from my age group.

What I got from reading it was more along the lines of "I know you are going to take it this particular way, but that is not the way in which I am trying to focus this discussion. No need to bring it up."

Not so much meant to be rude but EXTREMELY casual speech as you would use around close friends. Along the lines of: "Dude shut up about your car, I am talking about my own wheels."

I don't think the OP meant it in a negative way.

I can't comment on the "adult-in-chief" as I probably have that poster on ignore

edhopper

(33,482 posts)
17. I have started a few threads
Tue Jul 29, 2014, 07:27 PM
Jul 2014

with a preemptive statement about what i don't want to talk about.
There are less abusive ways to do it.

LostOne4Ever

(9,286 posts)
20. I agree with you totally
Tue Jul 29, 2014, 08:55 PM
Jul 2014

Very poor choice of words.

It is just that a lot of people I know from my generation (millennial) speak this way, and I suspect that it was just thoughtlessness on his/her part.

Also, I did a quick check and this particular poster has made a lot of posts in this very forum. This for example:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/123018726

So I want to give them the benefit of doubt.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
16. I especially enjoy that DetlefK was apparently just dropping one off in the punchbowl.
Tue Jul 29, 2014, 07:04 PM
Jul 2014

He or she hasn't returned to the thread.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»First we are told to shut...