Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Berkekely-Maher controversy (Original Post) Cartoonist Oct 2014 OP
That's funny considering his original rant included someone who wasn't allowed to speak at Yale arcane1 Oct 2014 #1
Should we draw straws? AlbertCat Oct 2014 #2
That was my mistake Cartoonist Oct 2014 #3
Mistake???? AlbertCat Oct 2014 #5
That's what I thought, but . . . Cartoonist Oct 2014 #6
For what it's worth, I don't think you made a mistake Rob H. Oct 2014 #7
I can understand one person not getting it Cartoonist Oct 2014 #8
Damn you LostOne4Ever Oct 2014 #4
I'm not that broken up about Berkley, to be honest Act_of_Reparation Oct 2014 #9
 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
1. That's funny considering his original rant included someone who wasn't allowed to speak at Yale
Mon Oct 27, 2014, 04:08 PM
Oct 2014

Because the student atheist group didn't think the scheduled speaker was ex-Muslim enough

Cartoonist

(7,315 posts)
3. That was my mistake
Mon Oct 27, 2014, 09:01 PM
Oct 2014

I should have kept it generic.

Some good replies over there.
#15. So Islam is a race?
#16. A half marathon between Mecca and Medinah

Other replies are predictable. To insult Islam is to insult every Arab on the planet, and other such tripe. Will Humanity ever be free from religion? Nope.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
5. Mistake????
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 11:18 AM
Oct 2014

I think it adds very important info to the controversy. Puts it into perspective.

Why should the protesters remain anonymous? I mean if they're gonna stand up and protest, shouldn't they, y'know... stand up?

Cartoonist

(7,315 posts)
6. That's what I thought, but . . .
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 11:32 AM
Oct 2014

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

This is a blatantly racist post. Please read in context. This member has pulled the arab sounding names of Berkeley students from this petition to make the point that those that are offended are those bad middle eastern people. See his follow up post below for more context.

JURY RESULTS

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: This is a RACIST post .... it sickens me to see this here.

Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Profiling by perceived ethnicity. Those named have a right to express themselves just as does Maher and his supporters.

Rob H.

(5,351 posts)
7. For what it's worth, I don't think you made a mistake
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 11:43 AM
Oct 2014

I don't know that keeping it generic would've helped, either, given that the people who're compelled trawl this group itching to find something to alert on would probably have alerted on it no matter how generic you could've made it.

Cartoonist

(7,315 posts)
8. I can understand one person not getting it
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 11:48 AM
Oct 2014

But four DUers agreed. People who want to see racism, will.

Act_of_Reparation

(9,116 posts)
9. I'm not that broken up about Berkley, to be honest
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 11:51 AM
Oct 2014

In any given academic year, your average public university hosts dozens of speakers. Most of them are academic, but some of them are controversial. The controversial ones are going to draw criticism, if not protest. It happens all the damned time; I don't see the protests surrounding Maher's visit as anything outside the norm.

I think the signatories to the petition to block Maher have every right to submit their petition to the school, but they should be aware UC Berkley is a public institution and is subject to the same speech regulations as are all public spaces. Unless Maher can be demonstrated to be in violation of the law or university diversity policies, the school probably can't stop him from speaking.

And I say that, at least in part, because I was very critical of a few speakers who visited my school. There was, for example, this craziness:



And the next year, showing they had learned absolutely nothing, the College Republicans invited Anne Coulter to speak. You know, after her lovely, "Kill their leaders, take their oil, and convert the rest to Christianity" spiel.

Freedom of speech isn't absolute, obviously. Universities have a legal obligation to provide a fair, impartial, welcoming environment to students of all walks of life. They can't, for example, host a KKK rally in the interest of free speech when it will likely create an unwelcoming environment for minority students. That line isn't always easy to discern, as in Maher's case, but students do need some recourse available to them in case the line is in danger of being crossed.

So, these kids are welcome to try to stop Maher from speaking. I don't think anything will come of it, however.
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»The Berkekely-Maher contr...