Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 06:47 AM Jan 2016

How The State Department Caved To Hillary Clinton’s Lawyer On Classified Emails

The State Department put up virtually no resistance when Hillary Clinton’s private lawyer requested to keep copies of her emails—even though those emails contained classified information, and even though it was unclear whether the attorney was cleared to see such secrets.

Experts on the handling of classified information tell The Daily Beast that the seemingly chummy arrangement between Clinton’s lawyer and her former State Department aides was “quite unusual.”

Newly released documents, obtained by The Daily Beast in coordination with the James Madison Project under the Freedom of Information Act, include legal correspondence and internal State Department communications about Clinton’s emails. Those documents provide new details about how officials tried to accommodate the former secretary of state and presidential candidate.

<snip>

“The arrangement with Kendall was far from the norm,” Steven Aftergood, an expert on classification and security policy at the Federation of American Scientists, told The Daily Beast. “There are a number of attorneys around who handle clients and cases involving classified information. They are almost never allowed to retain classified material in their office, whether they have a safe or not. Sometimes they are not even allowed to review the classified information, even if they are cleared for it, because an agency will say they don’t have a ‘need to know.’ In any event, the deference shown to Mr. Kendall by the State Department was quite unusual.”

<snip>

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/01/15/how-the-state-department-caved-to-hillary-clinton-s-lawyer-on-classified-emails.html

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How The State Department Caved To Hillary Clinton’s Lawyer On Classified Emails (Original Post) cali Jan 2016 OP
Dem Kerry's State Department caved to the former Dem Secretary who is running for Prez? merrily Jan 2016 #1
The people handling this were career foreign service karynnj Jan 2016 #7
When I posted Reply 1, I had a feeling you would respond to it. Nice to see you. merrily Jan 2016 #8
Hi - nice to see you too karynnj Jan 2016 #10
We may have to agree to disagree on whether things like this get run past the Secretary. merrily Jan 2016 #11
Still love Vermont and love that Bernie Sanders had a role in making Burlington the incredible place karynnj Jan 2016 #15
Glad to hear that you still love it, esp. after last winter. nt merrily Jan 2016 #16
How can she be so reckless? Wilms Jan 2016 #2
A political scene without Clintons Inc. is Paradise enow! Divernan Jan 2016 #3
36 years! From your keyboard to the ears of voters, caucusers, etc. merrily Jan 2016 #4
We Can ONLY Hope.. Beware... There Will Be Plenty Of "Shenanigans" On The Incorporated Side CorporatistNation Jan 2016 #14
That, at least, will be a relief. razorman Jan 2016 #18
"Benghazi!" baldguy Jan 2016 #5
Like that has anything to do with the op. Lame. cali Jan 2016 #6
When it comes to Hillary, some seem to conflate "Benghazi" with "Abracadabra." merrily Jan 2016 #9
If you can't recognize Darryl Issa's favorite subject baldguy Jan 2016 #17
'No resistance' and 'quite unusual' equals 'caved'? randome Jan 2016 #12
No resistance in this context certainly does. cali Jan 2016 #13

karynnj

(59,495 posts)
7. The people handling this were career foreign service
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 09:03 AM
Jan 2016

Patrick Kennedy entered the foreign service in 1973 and worked various jobs before becoming the under secretary of management. It really seems they got blind sided by believing Clinton that there was nothing classified on the server before gradually learning the breath of the problem.

I suspect people would have been even more suspicious had Clinton's email problem been handled by a political appointee. Long after this - as they expanded the department that usually did this - adding 50 people to the 12 there, they hired another government professional to manage the entire thing.

This is a mess that Clinton left for the state department. They have worked hard to professionally redact information that should not be public while getting all the emails Clinton gave them online. In fact, from day one this has been a no win proposition -- when everything is out - I will bet the issue will change to the fact that in 2014 - at least a year and as many as 5 years after an email was written, the Clinton people had the ability to include it or not include it in the 55000 emails given the State Department.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
8. When I posted Reply 1, I had a feeling you would respond to it. Nice to see you.
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 09:49 AM
Jan 2016

It's been a while.

karynnj

(59,495 posts)
10. Hi - nice to see you too
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 10:18 AM
Jan 2016

Plus your comment was fair and likely what many will see. The idea that the Secretary should sign off on every decision made by the large department is unrealistic - and if he were doing so on Clinton's email - it would open him to just these charges.

What has been clear is that he has deferred to the State IG on this whole issue - other than to repeatedly say that he wants the department to do a professional job on this. I would assume that he was not all that happy with the mess HRC left.

One thing I have no one mention is that each batch of emails is supposed to come out on the last day of each month. This month is the last batch -- and January 31 is - of course - the day before February 1 aka Iowa caucus day. How's that for awkward?

merrily

(45,251 posts)
11. We may have to agree to disagree on whether things like this get run past the Secretary.
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 10:37 AM
Jan 2016

Not every decision, no. But, we are not discussing every decision. We are talking only about a situation involving potential breaches of national security by a person who is both (a) his immediate predecessor as Secretary of State and (b) his party's presumptive Presidential nominee.

Still nice to see you, though. I hope you've been well and still enjoying Vermont.

karynnj

(59,495 posts)
15. Still love Vermont and love that Bernie Sanders had a role in making Burlington the incredible place
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 11:03 AM
Jan 2016

to live that it is.

 

Wilms

(26,795 posts)
2. How can she be so reckless?
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 06:54 AM
Jan 2016

It's as though she goes out of her way to damage herself. And to what end?

It's really no fun having a member of the party acting out all the time.

After the conventions, it will be the first time in 36 long years that there are no bushes or Clintons on the national stage.

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
3. A political scene without Clintons Inc. is Paradise enow!
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 07:11 AM
Jan 2016

To wake in the morning,
Go on the internet
And not dread what fresh hell hath Hillary/Bill/Chelsea/The Clinton Family Foundation wrought!


A Book of Verses underneath the Bough,
A Jug of Wine, a Loaf of Bread-and Thou
Beside me singing in the Wilderness-
O, Wilderness were Paradise enow!

CorporatistNation

(2,546 posts)
14. We Can ONLY Hope.. Beware... There Will Be Plenty Of "Shenanigans" On The Incorporated Side
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 10:47 AM
Jan 2016

in Iowa... Have to watch out for Clinton Inc. shipping in "ringers" little ole ladies from out of town... Maybe Chicago... Obama might have some connections from 2008... And Hillary has said that she has former Obama people on her team, "volunteers" etc....

razorman

(1,644 posts)
18. That, at least, will be a relief.
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 11:07 AM
Jan 2016

I think that most of the country is tired of, and skeptical of, dynasties. Whether the name is Bush, Clinton, Kennedy, Obama, or whatever; I think that people are against the idea that someone deserves to be president simply because they have a certain last name. That is a large part of the reason Jeb is doing so poorly in his reach for the GOP nomination.

 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
17. If you can't recognize Darryl Issa's favorite subject
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 09:02 PM
Jan 2016

and that the resulting attacks are built upon bullshit - then you're lost farther down the Republican rabbit hole than I've feared.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
12. 'No resistance' and 'quite unusual' equals 'caved'?
Fri Jan 15, 2016, 10:39 AM
Jan 2016

Meh.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"If you're bored then you're boring." -Harvey Danger[/center][/font][hr]

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»How The State Department ...