2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIt appears that for some, Bernie is not
"Presidential" enough, and that is a significant reason not to support him. They are saying that they just can't imagine Bernie sitting behind the desk in the Oval Office.
I get what they're saying. He doesn't fit the stereotype. Hillary, despite being a woman fits it better. She has a certain commanding presence and dignity.
What constitutes someone being presidential is hard to define, but a lot of it is formed by what we're accustomed to, and expands over time.
Kentonio
(4,377 posts)Taught how to dress, how to speak, how to gesture properly with their hands. Told what to say by polling consultants, told how to say it to draw the most positive reactions from the most affected demographics.
Now apparently someone not having that superficial polish is just 'not Presidential'. It's really sad that this nonsense has become more important to people than the actual policies and positions a politician holds.
azmom
(5,208 posts)so many levels. I for one can't wait for change to occur. I'm ready for Bernie.
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)and working FOR the little guy, Bernie is not presidential enough, I have to agree.
And that makes me more committed than ever to stand with Sanders!
Fuck the status quo!
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)are presidential? She makes Trump look normal.
Bernie is the one who acts with integrity and dignity.
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)As president I hope he can still find time to get out
http://o.aolcdn.com/dims-shared/dims3/GLOB/crop/1024x768+0+0/resize/1200x900!/format/jpg/quality/85/
pangaia
(24,324 posts)tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)a search for "bernie sanders marches" produced them...
funny thing is "hillary clinton marches" produced a bunch of similar pics with a particularly significant difference in my view:
Bernie is pictured marching side by side with people carrying signs for their particular cause.
Hillary is pictured marching while people are kept at safe distance holding signs with her name on them.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)The press in a rope line in the front and some people held back away from her from behind.
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)march in the parade and shake hands with the people in the crowd.
The press didn't get what they wanted that day.
I would wager that if the press was crowding Bernie while he was trying to march with his little sign in the pics in this thread, his "peeps" -- if they were any good and doing their job -- would surround him too and prevent the press from interfering with what was his purpose at the demonstration.
If she wanted to give a press avail, that's what she would have done. She wanted to walk a parade route and grip and grin.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)I can totally see him in the Oval Office. Is he "polished" in the usual sense? No, thankfully.
Does he have $400 haircuts? No thankfully.
Does he emanate a manufactured "image" designed to "look presidential". No.
Bernie is authentically Bernie, and he couldn't care less about this ^ crap; and I totally love
him for it and would be thrilled to have someone with those characteristics sitting in the WH.
emulatorloo
(44,106 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Senator Sanders is more of a 'peoples President' and Mrs. Clinton is a much more commanding person.
Her 'presence' at the 11 hour interrogation gives a great recent look at what type of president she would be. She is ready to get to work.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)I have no illusions that she'll actually fight for the middle class - she won't. It's not her "thing."
But I do feel like she'll have us in war every five minutes.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)It is people buying into superficial nonsense as political discourse. When our f*d media isn't portraying politics as a horse race, it is instead examining nose hairs. The last thing they want to discuss is the actual issues that candidates promote.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)I guess I hit a nerve.
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)earthside
(6,960 posts)Democrats, liberals, progressives don't like these kinds of stereotype characterizations.
An African-American ... is that "presidential'?
A woman ... is that 'presidential'?
A person of Jewish heritage ... is that 'presidential'?
Too rumpled a dresser to be president?
A laugh too cackling to be president?
Too old to be president?
When I hear someone talk about what it means to be 'presidential' my first thought is that this is Repuglican code for -- conservative; differential to existing power structure; prudent; well bred; conceited; supercilious.
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)But I agree you are touched.
sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)I also thought that T. Roosevelt (the teddy bear) was
a president!
Obviously I did not learn the PC kind of history.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Even members of his cabinet thought he looked like a bumpkin and said so.
ejbr
(5,856 posts)is more "presidential"; would they vote for him over Bernie? If not, they are hypocrites; if so, they're crazy
MADem
(135,425 posts)to finish the course there. He shot his pal in the face, and the pal ended up apologizing.
He was never "presidential."
That's just a poor example.
ejbr
(5,856 posts)not how he ACTS. Cheney doesn't scream, he is articulate, he dresses the part of a president. If you don't think that many Americans would consider him to be "presidential" in appearance and composure, then you are deluded. And given that the argument against Bernie is not his ideas, but how he looks and acts that are not "presidential", then I think we should stick to that premise and not focus on things that are not always included within the term "presidential" such as the things you note.
MADem
(135,425 posts)boss about how Adam Clymer is a "major league asshole!"
That's articulate to YOU? Your standards are very low if that's the case.
He's the jerk who eats off his WIFE'S PLATE at high profile public meals.
He's the guy who wears pants that are WAY too tight for his business.
And he's a war criminal--he started wars and profited, grossly, off them with his cough blind cough investments.
And he SHOT a guy....in the FACE!!!!
Are those the actions of a "Presidential" character?
You have a curious definition of the term.
I don't consider a bully boy extension of George W. Bush "Presidential," but that's me.
I think it's astoundingly churlish and rude of you to call me "deluded" when it is I who am in possession of the salient facts on this matter. There's nothing "presidential" about that assclown, unless you're a member of CPAC.
I never stated that Cheney's actions are presidential. He never stuttered or yelled when I heard him speak; his hair was always kempt. His voice was not abrasive. THESE are the only criteria I am using to determine if someone is presidential as I am assuming others are using for Bernie. Stop putting "words" in my mouth about whether Cheneys' abuses qualify as being presidential. Or are you truly dense?
MADem
(135,425 posts)"kempt" hair doesn't really mean much. And he snarled--his voice was OFTEN abrasive.
You have a VERY LOW BAR for "presidential" behavior and appearance, if Cheney makes your cut.
I spent many days in close proximity to him when he was SECDEF. Not only was he "not presidential," his wife was even worse.
I'm not putting any words in your mouth--you're the one repeatedly insisting that Dick Fucking Cheney is "presidential." I'm telling you he isn't and giving you concrete examples to prove my assertion.
And for my trouble, now you're calling me "dense?"
Do you realize how offensive and objectionable you are coming across? I'm not calling you "dense" or other insults because I disagree with your assessment--you might want to try civility for a change and see if it works for you.
smh.
ejbr
(5,856 posts)You are correct, that should not have been typed. However, my only point is that during the debates and his speeches, I don't think the average person would know he was as you say, and we now know. I am trying to understand what about Bernie is not presidential since we know nothing of any foul attributes as you described.
MADem
(135,425 posts)they believe are not presidential, if that's what you want to know, rather than comparing him with Dick Cheney, one of the biggest jerks to occupy the national stage in a half century, easily.
ejbr
(5,856 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)considering what he is looking at
just sayin
MADem
(135,425 posts)He's the opposite of "presidential."
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)i won't even say animal because most the animals i have ever known were quite nice.
demonic..,yeah, that works for me....
LWolf
(46,179 posts)a figurehead and a public servant.
Political theater for the masses or someone working for the masses.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)Bernie is presidential enough but he isn't bought
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)I guess I must have missed a super enlightening post.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)You know, he was wheelchair bound and of ill health, cantankerous, and didn't much care about appearing 'presidential'. Wouldn't it have been a shame if appearing presidential was the deciding factor?
John Poet
(2,510 posts)for eight years (I still won't say he won either election),
bouncing from one verbal flub to another
while moving from one disaster to the next...
After that, what the hell is the meaning of this 'presidential' thing
that people are supposed to want?
I think Bernie is EXTREMELY presidential.
I want a FIGHTER for ME in that office!
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)There must be a new definition for dignity that I missed.
anigbrowl
(13,889 posts)Bonus marks for originality though.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)er, oooops
never mind...
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)Where have we seen that before?