2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHRC refuses to answer whether single-payer would lower health care costs. (Video)
Around the 4:30 mark she is asked, "In a perfect world, do you believe that single payer would ultimately lower health care costs?"
http://www.cnn.com/videos/tv/2016/01/17/sotu-tapper-hillary-clinton-full-interview.cnn/video/playlists/sotu-highlights/
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)More at 11.
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)onecaliberal
(32,826 posts)riversedge
(70,191 posts)the only plan he had out at that point were the Legislative proposals (which had not been scored by COB-Congressional Budget Office)
State of the Union | Source: CNN
Added on 10:03 AM ET, Sun January 17, 2016
Hillary Clinton discussed her calls for more sanctions on Iran, her attacks on Bernie Sanders' healthcare views, and her stance on ISIS in an interview with Jake Tapper.
antigop
(12,778 posts)riversedge
(70,191 posts)antigop
(12,778 posts)peace13
(11,076 posts)...she is not concerned about Americans spending more than they can afford on health care. Her halting manner here tells me that she is not being truthful. Why do her supporters not demand more from her?
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Oooooooops!
Recursion
(56,582 posts)It all depends on the implementation.
If medical provider lobbyists write it, it will cost much, much more than we pay now.
dsc
(52,155 posts)and the answer is maybe. To take an example where it most certainly didn't lower costs, Medicare drugs. The only way it will lower costs is if providers are squeezed which means hospitals will close, doctors will leave some areas, and some people will have either less health care or less convenient health care than they do now (others will benefit greatly).
antigop
(12,778 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)dsc
(52,155 posts)frankly I don't think they are bad tradeoffs but they are tradeoffs none the less. Canadians do wait longer for some elective procedures than we do. Brits have fewer MRI machines and hospitals per capita than we do. There are many marginal hospitals which might well close under a public system. Unless you make those kinds of decisions, and they are not outlined at all in Bernie's plan, then the cost of a single payer system would be at best only a little lower than what we currently have.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Fretting over "cost" means nothing to the people locked out of the system today.
dsc
(52,155 posts)especially to those of us whose employers currently provide our insurance. There are tradeoffs. We should acknowledge that.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)If "cost" is such a horrid thing, why do we spend more than any other country, and get so much less for it?
Our current system sucks and we can do better.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Protecting your precious premiums and copays from that evil socialism!!1
Uncle Joe
(58,349 posts)Thanks for the thread, antigop.
antigop
(12,778 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)She also ridiculed Bernie's having introduced single payer legislation nine times -- as if it were a silly thing to do. For me, it demonstrates his honesty and sincerity; what he says is what he believes. Clinton can never claim that for herself.