Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumNew CNN/ORC Poll: SANDERS 51, Clinton 43, O'Malley 4
Source (will update with full CNN/ORC details): https://twitter.com/DavidChalian/status/690277943579381760
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
12 replies, 1435 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
12 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New CNN/ORC Poll: SANDERS 51, Clinton 43, O'Malley 4 (Original Post)
JonLeibowitz
Jan 2016
OP
No worries; someone will have to post it in LBN right? I'm not sure the qualifications to do that.
JonLeibowitz
Jan 2016
#3
I just automatically transposed the names by habit...holy moley...hope it holds up.
libdem4life
Jan 2016
#7
Yeah, wow ..... they talked to all of 280 democrats. Ppfffftttt. Next to worthless.
Persondem
Jan 2016
#9
The Iowans or the poll? Sometimes I get confused, Team Clinton doesn't respect Iowans.
JonLeibowitz
Jan 2016
#10
Touchy Touchy. I get the hint -- you want to shake some sense into me. n/t
JonLeibowitz
Jan 2016
#12
draa
(975 posts)1. Sweet.
Turn your back on us we turn our backs on you.
HerbChestnut
(3,649 posts)2. Beat me to it.
I'll let the other OP float around anyway if you don't mind.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)3. No worries; someone will have to post it in LBN right? I'm not sure the qualifications to do that.
It's worth saying twice.
thereismore
(13,326 posts)5. Whaaat? Seriously, didn't you swap the names? I did not expect this.
I like it fine, but I did not expect this.
Punkingal
(9,522 posts)6. Terrific.....beyond terrific!
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)7. I just automatically transposed the names by habit...holy moley...hope it holds up.
Apparently their internal polling already knew that. Would account for the very bad judgment of late.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)8. So is this why she decided to attack Bernie about Iran?
The debate was Sunday and she comes out with that on Thursday.
Something had to trigger it. I guess that this might have done it. Losing both Iowa and New Hampshire is going to make things tough for her and I guess she knows it.
Persondem
(1,936 posts)9. Yeah, wow ..... they talked to all of 280 democrats. Ppfffftttt. Next to worthless.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)10. The Iowans or the poll? Sometimes I get confused, Team Clinton doesn't respect Iowans.
Persondem
(1,936 posts)11. Why don't you read your own crappy poll and figure it out?
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)12. Touchy Touchy. I get the hint -- you want to shake some sense into me. n/t