Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ferd Berfel

(3,687 posts)
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 06:12 PM Jan 2016

Union Endorsements: When Members Decide - It's Bernie; When Leaders Decide - It's Clinton

http://www.commondreams.org/news/2016/01/22/bernie-sanders-gets-group-endorsements-when-members-decide-hillary-clinton-when


Bernie Sanders Gets Group Endorsements When Members Decide; Hillary Clinton When Leaders Decide




When it comes to what the word "Establishment" means, there is a pattern worth noting


In the war for endorsements in the Democratic presidential primary, there is a clear trend.

Every major union or progressive organization that let its members have a vote endorsed Bernie Sanders.

Meanwhile, all of Hillary Clinton’s major group endorsements come from organizations where the leaders decide. And several of those endorsements were accompanied by criticisms from members about the lack of a democratic process.

It’s perhaps the clearest example yet of Clinton’s powerful appeal to the Democratic Party’s elite, even as support for Sanders explodes among the rank and file.



5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Union Endorsements: When Members Decide - It's Bernie; When Leaders Decide - It's Clinton (Original Post) Ferd Berfel Jan 2016 OP
Did you put that together? 2pooped2pop Jan 2016 #1
No I didn't. THe Author of the Article did Ferd Berfel Jan 2016 #2
first of all, thank you for posting this. truedelphi Jan 2016 #3
Union "leaders" are agents of the party Establishment. Odin2005 Jan 2016 #4
what good is a vote if you lose by a landslide? reddread Jan 2016 #5
 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
1. Did you put that together?
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 06:19 PM
Jan 2016

It's fantastic and should put that whole endorsement thing to rest. (Though it won't because it's really all they had to use for Clinton). Nice job and thanks for posting it.

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
3. first of all, thank you for posting this.
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 06:29 PM
Jan 2016

Secondly, it is clear that the vast influence of the top people inside teh Unions needs examination...

Could it be that the heads of Unions have a good deal of influence.

And they know that Hillary is not all that honest.

Hence they can collect dues from their members, offer up financial support from Hillary, and then get one of two "favors" in return:

One) When the individual who made the decision to finance Hillary wants to continue to be in their top spot at the Union, Hillary Inc will support them

Two) The possibility of "kickbacks." Some of these might not be actual cash "giftings." But if a kid or cousin or mother-in-law needs a job somewhere and that job needs to be "soft and juicy" the Clintons will come through.

Such "niceties" would not come their way through support of Bernie.

Odin2005

(53,521 posts)
4. Union "leaders" are agents of the party Establishment.
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 06:49 PM
Jan 2016

THEY ARE CORRUPT and do not give a shit about workers. All the genuine activists were purged 60 years ago by McCarthyism.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Union Endorsements: When ...