Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PyaarRevolution

(814 posts)
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 06:47 PM Jan 2016

If the town hall doesn't sink Bernie, Bloomberg's run will.

Well most of us who support Bernie have thought the town hall coming on Monday will be the attempt to ply a Dean scream out of him, to get some soundbite that he can't rebut because it's not a debate.
It looks like the Plan B is to see Bloomberg run independent and act as a spoiler or to see a Corporatist win between Bernie, Trump and Sanders if that is was the general election looks like. NPR was talking about his popularity among voters of all stripes including Bernie supporters.
I know most of my fellow Bernie supporters are informed but let me be clear to anyone who has a rosy outlook towards Michael Bloomberg, the adage "Ignorance is bliss" very much applies in this situation. They called him a moderate and I call him a Corporatist above because of two issues(but I'm sure there are more). I'm sure most of us remember Occupy and Zuccati(?) Park and eventually being pushed out by the police under Bloomberg's rule. Another situation was when the hurricane hit New York City and they had to make sure supplies were being received by people around the five Burroughs. Bloomberg was the man insisting on running the NYC Marathon despite the fact streets needed to be clear to help distribute aid. He backed down after tremendous pressure. His reason for running it was that he wanted NYC back up and running. I'd say he wanted it back in business.
I believe the reason Bloomberg wanted NYC running was that he was losing money every day NYC was closed, so to speak. Bloomberg has been the richest man in NY state unless things have changed recently.
I remember hearing something about him doling out government contracts to friends when he got elected.

Bottom line. Look at the record and you'll see most of what you like from him was designed to ruffle as few feathers as possible.

58 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If the town hall doesn't sink Bernie, Bloomberg's run will. (Original Post) PyaarRevolution Jan 2016 OP
Who the hell here likes Bloomberg? nt retrowire Jan 2016 #1
Maybe most here don't... PyaarRevolution Jan 2016 #8
Jim Webb should/will run as an Independent--he'd draw a lot of Repub voters zazen Jan 2016 #2
I don't think Bloomberg, if he decides to run, will beat Bernie. stillwaiting Jan 2016 #3
That won't be the point. Bloomberg won't win, but the election would be decided by the house of still_one Jan 2016 #10
That's Democracy. draa Jan 2016 #16
I stated the rules wrong. If it goes to the house because no one gets the require 270 ec votes, the still_one Jan 2016 #24
Not likely. draa Jan 2016 #26
Sorry, but I don't see the EC math that puts this in the House. Bloomberg would KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #45
Any democratish independent will result in a republican president nt matt819 Jan 2016 #4
Bloomberg would hurt Trump more than Bernie. The multi-millionaire class. EndElectoral Jan 2016 #7
nope, the election in that case would go to the house, because no one would get the majority still_one Jan 2016 #14
You're assuming That Bernie misses the 270 mark demwing Jan 2016 #55
Bloomberg. Has no following outside New York. JDPriestly Jan 2016 #56
Bloomberg has no national profile. The official saltpoint Jan 2016 #5
No national profile. PyaarRevolution Jan 2016 #12
To me, Giuliani is essentially a saltpoint Jan 2016 #17
Oh yeah, Rahm. -_- PyaarRevolution Jan 2016 #27
Kafka! Appropriate association. Power saltpoint Jan 2016 #28
bloomberg will guarantee bernie or trump restorefreedom Jan 2016 #6
I believe it favors Trump. still_one Jan 2016 #25
probably. nt restorefreedom Jan 2016 #32
Is there ANYTHING about this campaign season that isn't a conspiracy? brooklynite Jan 2016 #9
It's the timing of both. PyaarRevolution Jan 2016 #15
Maybe they are afraid to have Bernie out in public? murielm99 Jan 2016 #20
LOL. The Unknown Candidate who went from 0 to par and in the lead in just a few months? libdem4life Jan 2016 #39
Even when ahead Bernies supporters must be victims. redstateblues Jan 2016 #53
I don't think that would hurt Bernie at all kristopher Jan 2016 #11
Actually, a Bloomberg run would validate mmonk Jan 2016 #13
What the OP is suggesting is that Sanders would be remarkably unpopular as Democratic nominee... brooklynite Jan 2016 #22
My concern is what I already said about a Bloomberg narrative above. PyaarRevolution Jan 2016 #30
Don't different states have time limits to register sadoldgirl Jan 2016 #18
Good question. Raine1967 Jan 2016 #47
FFS, Bernie will kick ass at that town hall, like he always does emulatorloo Jan 2016 #19
I know. Where is this meme coming from? Bernie excels at this. farleftlib Jan 2016 #29
Where is this meme coming from? Kalidurga Jan 2016 #57
I can't see Bloomberg being much of a draw for either side. Arugula Latte Jan 2016 #21
Well, that would require PARTY UNITY MY ASS... promoting that is a TOS violation HereSince1628 Jan 2016 #23
I can't imagine Bernie supporter will vote for an oligarch more likely the GOP voters Rosa Luxemburg Jan 2016 #31
Neither will sink Bernie. FloriDem Jan 2016 #33
Just think Jenny_92808 Jan 2016 #34
Nader didn't do Florida, that was all Harris and Jeb MisterP Jan 2016 #49
This. draa Jan 2016 #51
I think even UNWR admitted as much as 2001 MisterP Jan 2016 #52
If he runs it will re-affirm that the race was never between D's and R's, but the 1% vs. the 99%. GoneFishin Jan 2016 #35
If Bloomberg runs, he will likely take New York. Agnosticsherbet Jan 2016 #36
Bernie was born and raised in NY. Bloomberg doesn't have a lock on NY. in_cog_ni_to Jan 2016 #43
LOL Agnosticsherbet Jan 2016 #46
Bernie is not taking NY. Niether is Bloomberg. Raine1967 Jan 2016 #48
So you think Bernie can't hold his own in a town meeting? book_worm Jan 2016 #37
He's been doing this for decades. It's what he does. Unbelievable. libdem4life Jan 2016 #42
99% > 1%. Bloomberg takes ZERO votes away from Bernie. He takes the other Billionaires' votes, in_cog_ni_to Jan 2016 #38
Bloomberg? Billionaire political suicide. Bernie will kick Trumpf back to the Heimat appalachiablue Jan 2016 #41
This is a ploy to get us to vote for a corporate candidate. JRLeft Jan 2016 #40
GOod, He'll pull votes from Hillary and Trump but NO from Bernie! Ferd Berfel Jan 2016 #44
Seriously? Bloomberg (aka, l'll drop a Billion bucks) Karma13612 Jan 2016 #50
RU kidding, bloomberg is the anti-Bernie, he appeals to a totally different demographic tularetom Jan 2016 #54
poppycock reddread Jan 2016 #58

PyaarRevolution

(814 posts)
8. Maybe most here don't...
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 06:57 PM
Jan 2016

But I think the average person doesn't know enough about his record unless they're a New Yorker. I'm not one but finding out about those things I listed was enough to turn me away from the man utterly disgusted.

stillwaiting

(3,795 posts)
3. I don't think Bloomberg, if he decides to run, will beat Bernie.
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 06:55 PM
Jan 2016

His decision to run will be immediately transparent.

Bernie could be running against 2 billionaires.

I like his chances to be honest.

still_one

(92,060 posts)
10. That won't be the point. Bloomberg won't win, but the election would be decided by the house of
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 07:00 PM
Jan 2016

representatives, which is under republican control, and they would choose Ryan.

Republicans can't stand Bloomberg, and most Democrats will vote for Sanders', but the independents will split, and the result will be not enough electoral college votes for anyone to become president, and thus it will go to the house.

draa

(975 posts)
16. That's Democracy.
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 07:03 PM
Jan 2016

If he can win then those are the breaks. But he won't beat Bernie. If Clinton can't do it then no one can. And no one can.

still_one

(92,060 posts)
24. I stated the rules wrong. If it goes to the house because no one gets the require 270 ec votes, the
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 07:24 PM
Jan 2016

top three candidates will be voted on by the house, which has a republican majority.

The premise doesn't even include Clinton. The premise is that Bloomberg would run as an independent in the GE if Trump and Bernie are the parties nominees. If it went to the republican controlled house, Trump would win. The VP would be determined by similar rules in the Senate. If the house is frozen on the decision, the VP choose by the Senate would be the President, until the house deadlock is resolved.

Unfortunately, the situation in this case would favor Trump

draa

(975 posts)
26. Not likely.
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 07:29 PM
Jan 2016

But let's say it does get to that point. That's still Democracy and unless we change the rules that govern situations like that, and we never will, it's just the way it is.

We can talk about it as long as we want but until it happens it's all "what if." Not worth worrying about, especially since we can't change it.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
45. Sorry, but I don't see the EC math that puts this in the House. Bloomberg would
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 09:39 PM
Jan 2016

have to win a few states to pull this off. What states could Bloomberg possibly win????

still_one

(92,060 posts)
14. nope, the election in that case would go to the house, because no one would get the majority
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 07:02 PM
Jan 2016

electoral votes needed, and the republican controlled house will elect a republican. Trump in this case.

It would be a disaster.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
56. Bloomberg. Has no following outside New York.
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 01:10 AM
Jan 2016

That is my impression in California.

How do African-Americans relate to Bloomberg?

saltpoint

(50,986 posts)
5. Bloomberg has no national profile. The official
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 06:56 PM
Jan 2016

word going out is that he is "frustrated" over both parties' possibly nominating "extremists," by which I suppose he means Trump and Sanders, forgetting that if any candidate of any stripe wins a primary, then several primaries, then enough to win a party's nomination, that candidate's nomination represents the voice of the people.

Maybe Michael Bloomberg does things differently in his closed-door board room negotiations, but those meetings are not democratic.

He's welcome to run if he wants. He has the big bucks in his back pocket. But he has no national profile and to date no national support.

PyaarRevolution

(814 posts)
12. No national profile.
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 07:01 PM
Jan 2016

This is part of my concern. I DON'T want this man being able to write a false narrative about how he behaved as the mayor of NYC. Look at how much undeserved support Rudy Giulliani got just because he was mayor of NYC at the time of the 9/11 attacks, let's not forget the treatment of police towards Black people at that time.

saltpoint

(50,986 posts)
17. To me, Giuliani is essentially a
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 07:06 PM
Jan 2016

mobster. I read all the previous year how he was on the path to the presidency, and then screamed with delight when his campaign plopped in the mudgutter, ending once and for all in Florida.

It was a great day for America.

The national mood right now is kind of a mess. I think you are right that Bloomberg would try to write a "champion's narrative" of his time as NYC mayor. But I don't think it is going to persuade people in Cheyenne and Chicago to vote for him.

PyaarRevolution

(814 posts)
27. Oh yeah, Rahm. -_-
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 07:30 PM
Jan 2016

No kidding, they're two peas in a pod but Bloomberg is slicker. Jeez, Hillary and the rest. Am I the only one reminded of Kafka's Metamorphosis? I wish their masks would come clean off.

saltpoint

(50,986 posts)
28. Kafka! Appropriate association. Power
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 07:32 PM
Jan 2016

and influence as achievable goals, duly achieved, but revealed as hollow victories when one wakes up as an insect.

brooklynite

(94,302 posts)
9. Is there ANYTHING about this campaign season that isn't a conspiracy?
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 06:57 PM
Jan 2016

Did you worry that the one-on-one's with Rachel Maddow were a plot to "get some soundbite that he can't rebut"?

PyaarRevolution

(814 posts)
15. It's the timing of both.
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 07:02 PM
Jan 2016

Like the saying goes "Timing is everything". If either event were at some other time I'd be less skeptical.

edit: Forgot to add the fact that the Town Hall seems spontaneous as well unless I'm missing something and you can correct me.

murielm99

(30,712 posts)
20. Maybe they are afraid to have Bernie out in public?
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 07:11 PM
Jan 2016

He might say something unfortunate and hurt his chances? Interesting OP.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
39. LOL. The Unknown Candidate who went from 0 to par and in the lead in just a few months?
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 09:07 PM
Jan 2016

Surely you can't be serious. As opposed to the one who went from, what 80 to under 50 now? Yes, indeed he may say something...but it may surprise as to whom it would be unfortunate?

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
11. I don't think that would hurt Bernie at all
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 07:00 PM
Jan 2016

70% of the voters agree with Bernie's policies and it is those policies his integrity is selling.

Let him run. It provide a strong affirmation that the election really, undeniably Is about a more fair economic system and that can only serve to bring the disaffected to Bernie's tent.

mmonk

(52,589 posts)
13. Actually, a Bloomberg run would validate
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 07:01 PM
Jan 2016

the whole premise of the Sanders campaign. Who would win would be determined by how many voters get it.

brooklynite

(94,302 posts)
22. What the OP is suggesting is that Sanders would be remarkably unpopular as Democratic nominee...
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 07:16 PM
Jan 2016

...because if he wasn't, Bloomberg wouldn't have an opportunity to beat him in any otherwise Democratic State.

Right?

PyaarRevolution

(814 posts)
30. My concern is what I already said about a Bloomberg narrative above.
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 07:33 PM
Jan 2016

People's ignorance of Bloomberg outside of NYC allows him to possibly construct a bs narrative that I believe the MSM would run.

This is why I posted topic originally, to have anyone who knows someone who isn't clear about Bloomberg's record to read up on it.

sadoldgirl

(3,431 posts)
18. Don't different states have time limits to register
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 07:11 PM
Jan 2016

to run even as an independent?

I heard during the early Trump run threats of
running as an independent, but that he would have
had to make his decision by December.

Does any one know the rules for this?

emulatorloo

(44,057 posts)
19. FFS, Bernie will kick ass at that town hall, like he always does
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 07:11 PM
Jan 2016

The more people are exposed to Bernie, the better.

 

farleftlib

(2,125 posts)
29. I know. Where is this meme coming from? Bernie excels at this.
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 07:33 PM
Jan 2016

He is going to walk away with this like he always does.

 

Arugula Latte

(50,566 posts)
21. I can't see Bloomberg being much of a draw for either side.
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 07:13 PM
Jan 2016

Yeah, he might pull a percent here or there, but it will probably be a wash. Not many people will vote for that guy for president.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
23. Well, that would require PARTY UNITY MY ASS... promoting that is a TOS violation
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 07:21 PM
Jan 2016

Besides most democrats support the idea that any Dem candidate is better than the -other- options? RIght?????

And then there is the -practical- math. Bloomberg would split the republicans

Against solidarity among Democrats and left-leaning Independents...that looks like a win for D's.

It's gonna be a helluva year.

Cubs are gonna make it to the National League Series and the New Dems are gonna get benched in the Big Show!

 

Jenny_92808

(1,342 posts)
34. Just think
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 07:50 PM
Jan 2016

of how many people who would still be alive or not have suffered if Nador was not a spoiler which allowed the supreme court to give the election to the candidate that actually lost the election.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
52. I think even UNWR admitted as much as 2001
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 12:52 AM
Jan 2016

this brazen lie has only survived 16 years because it serves some very powerful (Lieberman- and Bloomberg-endorsing) factions

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
35. If he runs it will re-affirm that the race was never between D's and R's, but the 1% vs. the 99%.
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 07:54 PM
Jan 2016

They are becoming more and more bold about their "insiders only" scam.

in_cog_ni_to

(41,600 posts)
43. Bernie was born and raised in NY. Bloomberg doesn't have a lock on NY.
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 09:33 PM
Jan 2016

Unless there's more 1%ers there than 99%ers and I don't think that's the case.

PEACE
LOVE
BERNIE

Raine1967

(11,589 posts)
48. Bernie is not taking NY. Niether is Bloomberg.
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 11:11 PM
Jan 2016

This is a bigger problem than NY. Bloomberg is a problem WRT moderates.

book_worm

(15,951 posts)
37. So you think Bernie can't hold his own in a town meeting?
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 08:49 PM
Jan 2016

and that it's some evil plan to derail him? What idiocy.

in_cog_ni_to

(41,600 posts)
38. 99% > 1%. Bloomberg takes ZERO votes away from Bernie. He takes the other Billionaires' votes,
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 08:56 PM
Jan 2016

Trump's votes. No one now planning to vote for Bernie, the populist, would even dream of voting for 1% BILLIONAIRE Bloomberg! Not going to happen. Bloomberg gets in, BERNIE WINS, hands down.

PEACE
LOVE
BERNIE

appalachiablue

(41,102 posts)
41. Bloomberg? Billionaire political suicide. Bernie will kick Trumpf back to the Heimat
Sat Jan 23, 2016, 09:16 PM
Jan 2016

and outrun any other GOP candidate.

Karma13612

(4,538 posts)
50. Seriously? Bloomberg (aka, l'll drop a Billion bucks)
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 12:42 AM
Jan 2016

Is not going to appeal to Bernie supporters. He will attract those not convinced about Hillary.

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
54. RU kidding, bloomberg is the anti-Bernie, he appeals to a totally different demographic
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 12:59 AM
Jan 2016

Bloomberg will not take one vote from Bernie. That's just ludicrous.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»If the town hall doesn't ...