2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumOfficial Iowa Presidential Forum Thread 1 - Bernie Sanders
Last edited Tue Jan 26, 2016, 12:04 AM - Edit history (1)
Bernie Sanders thread: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1066052
Hillary Clinton thread: http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511066758
elleng
(130,865 posts)Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)Someone had to.
femmocrat
(28,394 posts)I'm already annoyed at the moderator for asking Bernie if he is "up to the job"! Is he supposed to say "no"?
Gregorian
(23,867 posts)MissDeeds
(7,499 posts)ProudToBeLiberal
(3,964 posts)aikoaiko
(34,169 posts)As the kids say.
firebrand80
(2,760 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)liberalnarb
(4,532 posts)firebrand80
(2,760 posts)It looks to me like he's conducting an orchestra
liberalnarb
(4,532 posts)2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)liberalnarb
(4,532 posts)Punkingal
(9,522 posts)Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Right, like Rove's AmericanCrossroads SuperPac, which has been spending millions to develop anti-Clinton messages. But he didn't mention that.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)That said, he means we should get rid of ALL SuperPACs. What's not to understand?
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Go to AmericanCrossroads-dot-org and enjoy a déjà vu moment.
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)You know, the one where everything is snatched away from Hillary as the people see right through her.
artislife
(9,497 posts)INdemo
(6,994 posts)She lied
Joe Shlabotnik
(5,604 posts)ProudToBeLiberal
(3,964 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Try it out: https://valadian.github.io/SandersHealthcareCalculator/
I am one of the lucky few who does not pay health insurance premiums (but I do have high co-pays and deductibles) as a perk from my company, I would STILL save nearly $1,000 a year and my company would save about $9,000.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Resulting in overall savings. Forgot that little part, lol
marlakay
(11,451 posts)He is raising taxes and wont mention second part.
trueblue2007
(17,205 posts)Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)Ending private insurance premiums and corporate taxes
ProudToBeLiberal
(3,964 posts)It might wrk for a debate format, but it doesn't look god in a town hall etting.
Gregorian
(23,867 posts)firebrand80
(2,760 posts)Sticking to your talking points like glue can work
I can damn near answer these questions for him, and I don't even listen to him all that much.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)At least he doesn't talk down to people like some other, ahem, candidates.
And, he's being very personable, joking about gaining weight, winning votes and mugging with the audience.
Samantha
(9,314 posts)This is not a debate. Sanders is repeating his position on issues in the same manner as he does while campaigning because in many, many cases this is the first time people are hearing his ideas. He is introducing himself for the first time to thousands of people, and this is how he says, this is who I am.
Sam
Gregorian
(23,867 posts)Great answers.
Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)ecstatic
(32,685 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)Joe Shlabotnik
(5,604 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Bet he will not do that to Hillary
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)book_worm
(15,951 posts)how will that work in the general election? Other candidates who said that taxes needed to be raised or who later raised them after pledging not to (Bush I) were defeated? Can Bernie overcome this?
ProudToBeLiberal
(3,964 posts)How is that going to work in swing states like Ohio, Virginia, and Florida?
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Samantha
(9,314 posts)instead of people paying premiums to health insurance companies, netting an average of savings of $5,000.
Who wouldn't like that?
Sam
Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)He promised tax hikes and won big
rufus dog
(8,419 posts)Don't let facts get in the way
Punkingal
(9,522 posts)ecstatic
(32,685 posts)revenue / taxes based on speculation wouldn't be enough to cover the costs of some of his proposed programs.
cali
(114,904 posts)ecstatic
(32,685 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)How?
Just add an automated algorithm to the transaction. That's what we have computers and computer programmers for.
INdemo
(6,994 posts)Speculation will never end because that is the financial market at work..good or bad.
Investors will lose money today with speculation or bet on the makets to do down..that is the way it works..
They make millions with the market rising and then make millions on that same market going down..
there has always been always will be speculation in the Market place.
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)Models of financial transaction taxes take into account that there will be about half as many deals as a result. Basically you'll be cutting all these extreme short term arbitrage deals where the fuckers are trying to clear a quarter percent in an hour or a microsecond, and lots of other bullshit besides.
livetohike
(22,140 posts)Gregorian
(23,867 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)I love the crusty old Jew.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)I kid you not.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Now I can go upstairs, get in bed and read about Napoleon's invasion of Russia.
He had had a lot of experience, also.
OK little story, before I go.
I was born in NYC, 1943....Presbyterian, I later learned. :> )... lived just off Riverside Drive near 125th street. In the next door apartment lived an older Jewish couple. Rose Kahn, as much a caricature of an old Brooklyn Jewish grandmother as you could get-- dumpy, bossy, obsessive compulsive, big fleshy hands, blubbery kisses, old ratty apron, , whom we loved dearly and whom we called Nana, would baby sit me.. When I was like 2-3 years old she would feed me.... pickled herring !!! I kid you not.. pickled herring !!!
And to this day I LOVE pickled herring.. In fact the SAME, exact same brand, VITA, in the same jar !!!
Go figure...
So, here is a toast to Minerve Schlegelmilch
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)Gregorian
(23,867 posts)JudyM
(29,233 posts)It's been dredged up too many times already and it is at the point of becoming a meme here.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)propensity for HRC supporters to act like they are so pure.
JudyM
(29,233 posts)to keep it going. I understand what you mean but but really, the image is hurtful to keep referring to. Let them bring it up, we don't have to extend it. It's like saying "they called Obama a N****" ... none of us would keep repeating that.
Peace.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)charmer with a twinkle in his eye and a Disney-like personality--I'd be begging Mitt Romney to run.
Gregorian
(23,867 posts)Punkingal
(9,522 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Are you watching something else?
Yes. He looks serious when he's talking about serious things. So what?
Joe Shlabotnik
(5,604 posts)Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)Bernie is answering on the issues, but not getting sucked into the "big government" question.
Punkingal
(9,522 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)Punkingal
(9,522 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)Democrats don't buy into the big government notion.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)It's good tyo ask tough questions that are on people minds, so candidates should have a chancer to answer them
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Let's see if he is this condescending to Hillary
SamKnause
(13,091 posts)What an ass Cuomo is.
Matariki
(18,775 posts)blah and bullshite.
valerief
(53,235 posts)ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)ProudToBeLiberal
(3,964 posts)This isn't a really good venue for him.
ecstatic
(32,685 posts)I hope he keeps this tone of voice for the rest of the segment.
valerief
(53,235 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)He's fine.
Arazi
(6,829 posts)Autumn
(45,057 posts)Gregorian
(23,867 posts)joshcryer
(62,269 posts)Not one call to divert donations away from them!
KentuckyWoman
(6,679 posts)The question was do we really want bigger government than ever.
He needs to remind everyone government needs to be big enough to serve the general welfare.... which is a primary role of government as listed in the US Constitution.
The REASON we want MORE government involvement in the delivery and payment of medical care is because we tried the route of trusting the private market to do so to the benefit of our citizen. Private Sector has utterly failed to provide medical care to our citizens in a fair and efficient manner. Because medical care is a basic need for a human being we CAN'T treat it as a privilege only for the wealthy. This is one of the exact areas of general welfare that government SHOULD be involved.
I post this in case by some miracle on of his people see it. Please oh please. We need to counter the idea that government is a bad thing. He dances around it by reminding us the government we have is only working for the billionaires... but he's a plain spoken man and really needs to lay it on the line for the simplest voter.
valerief
(53,235 posts)KentuckyWoman
(6,679 posts)that's the framing we have. And I know he "gets" it. He knows we need a government that is big enough........ not bloated..... but big enough. It's WHY he bills himself as a Democratic Socialist.
Even if he saves it for the general election up against the Republicans that's cool by me...... but I'd just really like to see him just tackle that whole "framing" issue.
ecstatic
(32,685 posts)You can never go wrong by "keeping it real."
nolabear
(41,959 posts)I hear a lot of complaining about how Chris is treating Bernie but it sounds to me as though he's trying to move him from talking points to answers. I'd hope he would do the same for Hillary. People need to know details.
TCJ70
(4,387 posts)...I will say that I thought this was supposed to be between the candidates and the viewers, not the moderator.
nolabear
(41,959 posts)johnnyrocket
(1,773 posts)...you have to have an answer to the critics.
ecstatic
(32,685 posts)nolabear
(41,959 posts)femmocrat
(28,394 posts)He has used that phrase several times.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)Because the payroll tax does not apply to income above that level. People making $400,000 a year pay the same dollar amount as those making $210,000. The same for people making more than that.
If you remove the cap then people continue to pay that same tax on the income above $210K/yr.
Sorry if that was not very clear. I hope you got the idea.
femmocrat
(28,394 posts)Gregorian
(23,867 posts)It raises the cap that says you only pay this much if you make any more. But I could be full of shit. That's my understanding.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)This means that if income is earned OVER that amount, it isn't taxed. Lifting the cap to say - $250,000 would create a lot more tax dollars and needs to be done. Hell, it needs to be raised to a million.
questionseverything
(9,651 posts)after that people do not have to pay ss taxes on their income
Response to femmocrat (Reply #51)
johnnyrocket This message was self-deleted by its author.
johnnyrocket
(1,773 posts)...after that, you pay no more tax. He wants to eliminate the cap...so all your income is subject to the 6.2% tax.
Zen Democrat
(5,901 posts)If it were raised to include those making between $119,000 and $200,000, Social Security would have a surplus and benefits could be raised. It's lifting the cap on income taxable for Social Security.
femmocrat
(28,394 posts)I wanted to make sure I understood it as Bernie was referencing it.
hedda_foil
(16,372 posts)It applies to income earned from work only, not from investments. So people whose salary is $150,000, 200,000, $500,000 or millions, but they only have to pay FICA taxes on the first $108,000. Raising that cap would greatly increase the money available to pay tobeneficiaries.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)So far he is right on the money there.
Gregorian
(23,867 posts)On a major network. I never thought I'd see the day.
valerief
(53,235 posts)Gregorian
(23,867 posts)Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)ProudToBeLiberal
(3,964 posts)rufus dog
(8,419 posts)We got it the first three times, his style annoys you. HRC annoys people with her style. I don't give a fucking damn about style, focus on substance.
Arazi
(6,829 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Figured that out after the first few attacks
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)His tone is fine.
cali
(114,904 posts)Autumn
(45,057 posts)You are hilarious.
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Punkingal
(9,522 posts)Response to Renew Deal (Original post)
cherokeeprogressive This message was self-deleted by its author.
TCJ70
(4,387 posts)...come on CNN. This is ridiculous.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)nolabear
(41,959 posts)Maybe they'll play one of his during her questions.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Instead we have CNN playing a Hillary ad (unpaid I might add... free air time) and force Bernie Sanders to speak to it.
Town hall my fucking ass.
nolabear
(41,959 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)That's NOT how Town Hall type meetings are supposed to work.
Hosts don't editorialize. Audience members as questions. THAT'S how Town Hall meetings go.
Punkingal
(9,522 posts)Mufaddal
(1,021 posts)It would be the only way to look even-handed, and it would certainly be interesting to get her reaction. But we'll see. I'm not exactly holding my breath.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Sure, give her 2 free minutes of his time. Fuck.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)"Secretary Clinton, Bernie said..."
Softball meant to allow Hillary to swing for the fence.
ProudToBeLiberal
(3,964 posts)This was a huge faux pas
ProudToBeLiberal
(3,964 posts)Autumn
(45,057 posts)femmocrat
(28,394 posts)when he explained that insurance premiums will be reduced or eliminated, it made sense. And he wants to raise taxes on Wall Street.
Arazi
(6,829 posts)Arent you "brave"?
Transparent!
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)He gave a very good explanation. Just because you fail to listen to it is not our problem. So what else did he say in that answer?
brentspeak
(18,290 posts)Unintentionally funny and sad at the same time.
Gregorian
(23,867 posts)Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)And I don't really understand why.
valerief
(53,235 posts)nolabear
(41,959 posts)I'm not a fan of it myself. It sounds like a speech rather than Q&A.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)He wanted to face the audience directly.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)He nearly had to do a Linda Blair from the Exorcist to answer that young lady's question.
ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)Their last dying gasp, to stop Bernie.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)"OK, I have to stand up to answer this one."
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)of course
ram2008
(1,238 posts)WOW!!! Stand up Bernie!
nolabear
(41,959 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)I don't know that he won it, but he answered it very well.
nolabear
(41,959 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)ram2008
(1,238 posts)Sitting here with my grandparents, and they're extremely impressed with Bernie. before the town hall started they said he didn't have a chance.
nolabear
(41,959 posts)ProudToBeLiberal
(3,964 posts)Lots of nervous laughter in the audience.
TCJ70
(4,387 posts)...contrasted with hers is not an attack unless he's lying about the record. That's HRC's territory not Bernie's...
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)Just sayin...
nolabear
(41,959 posts)It's politics, but he does it.
Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)rufus dog
(8,419 posts)And stating McCain was better prepared.
OrwellwasRight
(5,170 posts)Doesn't it make the point?
If experience is what counts, Cheney would have been great. He wasn't great, ergo, experience is not the key.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)azmom
(5,208 posts)Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)Matariki
(18,775 posts)azmom
(5,208 posts)Authenticity. The guy comes accross as smart, well informed, caring and HONEST. He is going to win this thing.
Gregorian
(23,867 posts)ProudToBeLiberal
(3,964 posts)Why is he changing his style? It doesn't suit him.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)If he falsely claimed that she had worked for a slum lord, that would be an attack.
ProudToBeLiberal
(3,964 posts)grandpa?
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)He's fine. Contrasting their records is not going negative. She'll do it, too, but the difference is that she'll lie about his record to do it.
Autumn
(45,057 posts)nolabear
(41,959 posts)Deny and Shred
(1,061 posts)He endured amped-up attacks from all corners this week. He explained how little he desires to pivot away from issues and address the recent attacks. He changed his style in response to a change in how he's been attacked lately. It's called a response to criticism.
Continue to side with those that have mischaracterized his positions, though. I guess those attacks don't matter. Hillary can play the victim now and it suits you just fine.
She's up soon. We can compare the fairness of tonight's questions tomorrow, then compare the sincerity of their answers.
firebrand80
(2,760 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)Paulie
(8,462 posts)ProudToBeLiberal
(3,964 posts)TCJ70
(4,387 posts)...but there's an element of the left that painted it as blanket immunity and it isn't. Any question about that subject has to be filtered through the little known reality.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)If you listen to his answer. Sure seemed to answer her question as she seemed quite impressed.
aikoaiko
(34,169 posts)I'm confident Iowa voters understand them.
Gregorian
(23,867 posts)Then he's challenged, and still pulls out of it.
Bernie's got it!
ProudToBeLiberal
(3,964 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Was very impressed
OrwellwasRight
(5,170 posts)Look at her face. She is mad that he didn't crumble in the face of her question.
marlakay
(11,451 posts)And you can tell the questions that were planted they had both people act like they were ok with his answer so it wouldn't look planted.
OrwellwasRight
(5,170 posts)marlakay
(11,451 posts)They sure seemed to go after him, not just ask questions.
And asking about guns at the end, like they wanted that to stay in peoples minds.
Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)It makes sense if they sell a lot of guns, but not a few guns.
TCJ70
(4,387 posts)...as there are a lot of misconceptions about his initial position and the bill he voted for.
Nanjeanne
(4,950 posts)He said if a gun shop sold a lot of guns to one person or group, that is something a gun shop or manufacturer should know and be concerned about and in that case should be liable.
Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)Is there a difference between an underage driver buying 1 beer and having an accident compared to several beers? The answer is no and it should be the same for guns.
Nanjeanne
(4,950 posts)In your example to make it fit gun manufacturer liability you would be saying the car manufacturer is responsible not the driver.
Personally I'm not sure where I stand on this particular point. I hate all guns so I'm not the best person to be rational about gun control. But I see his point. If a gun is sold legally and the buyer shoots someone, why should the gun seller be liable? But if a gun seller sells 100 guns to one person and they take over a government building and shoot a bunch of people -- perhaps the gun seller should be liable. Even if the guns were sold legally, wouldn't selling that many guns to one person tick a level of suspicion?
It's pretty nuanced but then Bernie doesn't talk down to people. He isn't slick and doesn't use sound bites. He is being asked to explain his votes on specific bills that are complex. That makes e planning in a minute or two pretty difficult.
DaGimpster
(130 posts)To purchase handgun in this state, you must first go to the county sheriff in which you reside and apply for a handgun permit (or do it online these days).
If a gun store then legally sells me a handgun after inspecting this permit and running the NICS check, flawed as it may be, why is the onus on them to determine if I'm going to become unhinged with it?
Now, if that gun store is pushing hundreds of low-quality/low-cost guns though, then yes I believe they are culpable. It's an older graphic now, but look at where the guns that are being used in Chicago are coming from. It was a select small minority of FFL gun dealers.
This is my take on the situation.
azmom
(5,208 posts)Old.
questionseverything
(9,651 posts)wozers
nolabear
(41,959 posts)What he's saying is lovely but it's FAR more complicated than that. Not that he can give a good answer in this forum.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)ROFL
azmom
(5,208 posts)femmocrat
(28,394 posts)Again! It's obvious that Bernie still has all his marbles and enjoys good health. Fer cryin' out loud.
azmom
(5,208 posts)Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)He started his service at 76
Mufaddal
(1,021 posts)Bernie is only a year older.
Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)Mufaddal
(1,021 posts)and now seems to regret not doing it.
elias49
(4,259 posts)I await him asking follow-ups of the other candidates.
rufus dog
(8,419 posts)He isn't being a Dick, if he is consistent with the other two he will have done his job.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Gregorian
(23,867 posts)RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)I am so glad to hear the next president speak here.
valerief
(53,235 posts)I don't think I'll hear anything new.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)are a couple of parrots.
That's all.
Joe Shlabotnik
(5,604 posts)Its a work day tomorrow, and I've seen Hillary's shtick before.
firebrand80
(2,760 posts)It's the kind of thing he doesn't do nearly enough of
azmom
(5,208 posts)Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)One of his better ones. He's not as strong in the debate format as he was here.
nolabear
(41,959 posts)Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)azmom
(5,208 posts)Gregorian
(23,867 posts)His head didn't open up and Marx come sauntering out. Nope.
FrenchieCat
(68,867 posts)I like his ideas fine. I like Bernie Sanders fine.
I didn't see it all, so I will ask now....was he asked how we would pass these laws he is championing?
Note: I'm an Hillary supporter because I just don't think the redistribution of wealth part, and other of Bernie's attributes will play in Ohio during the general Election vetting process, and I don't want a President Rubio (as that is who will be the GOP nominee, once all is said and done)
PS: I wish that supporters would be as gracious to other supporters as Sanders and Clinton seem to be to each other. It does not good to say I'm gracious if the people who are advocating you are not.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Matariki
(18,775 posts)with a two fold answer. First, he cited his record of getting thing though Congress and having worked with Republican on common ground issues - and more importantly he cited the need for people to get engaged in the political process and demand change. Obama said pretty much the same thing, if I recall. It's not a magical answer but it's definitely the truth, it's what it will take.
Mufaddal
(1,021 posts)And you've raised a great issue that illustrates the difference between candidates. When Bernie talks about a "political revolution," he's not using it as a catch phrase. He's talking about him getting elected as Step 1. Step 2 is that, during that time and after, a mass movement needs to be built to bring heretofore unseen pressure on elected officials to get his agenda done. That's the most critical part, and that's also why he says it doesn't matter if he gets elected and then everyone else just bails. He doesn't mean a mass movement to get him elected, he means a mass movement to change the country and fight to have a representative and responsive government. And he's right: short of that kind of mass movement, real change is not going to come, and disparity will continue to grow as we slide farther along into the hole of corporate oligarchy. So in the end, it's a two-pronged plan. Without one piece, the other doesn't work so much. If he was advocating exactly the same positions, but his message about his agenda was, "just get me into office, I'll take care of it," I would agree actually agree with you. There would be zero chance of meaningful structural change--just like the last couple of decades--in terms of benefit to ordinary working people. Thankfully, he gets it: it's not really leaders who make history, it's the people. His campaign is our campaign. It's everyone's campaign.
FrenchieCat
(68,867 posts)fight the Republicans and those moderate Democrats that needed pressure on them....
but very few actually followed through.....and the ones that did, there weren't enough of them!
What I saw instead were most pointed their fingers at Obama throughout, and criticized him!
That's why I stopped posting here! I was literally dispirited by the mean and judgmental approach
those who didn't get what they felt we should get....
They acted like their job was dissing the President on the Internet;
So good luck with the Revolution.....
as I hope it will be much more productive than hurling insults at one person day in, day out!
Peace
OrwellwasRight
(5,170 posts)are not working well. http://health.usnews.com/health-news/hospital-of-tomorrow/articles/2015/10/20/do-accountable-care-organizations-work
And this is about all they have to reduce costs in the multiple payer model.
You have to get the profit motive out. O'Malley should go farther on this.
SheenaR
(2,052 posts)Because I'm not an idiot and can do simple math.
3 mins in the fear mongering begins for the final candidate