2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSince when is an energetic candidate "manic?"
Manic is a psychiatric symptom used in a diagnosis. It means something, as those who have manic episodes and the people who love them know. All three Democratic presidential candidates at last night's town hall were energetic. They spoke strongly about their ideas. They responded to questions emphatically.
That's not "manic." That's energy. Yet, only one of the candidates was called "manic" by anyone. There's a disconnect somewhere in how we characterize women who run for office. We don't use words like "manic" to describe men who speak emphatically or gesture strongly when on the campaign trail. And yet, if a woman does the same thing, some believe there's something wrong with that woman.
"Manic" is often used as a replacement for "hysterical." In my opinion, it should not be used at all to describe energetic candidates who speak their minds emphatically. I expect energy from candidates, especially Presidential candidates. I expect to feel the fire burning within them. I want them to speak out strongly.
All three candidates did that last evening. Bravo to each and every one of them!
thereismore
(13,326 posts)Especially when that person consciously tries to be more animated or more "energetic" than he/she normally is. It may look like there is something wrong with them. I think it is certainly within the realm of possibility that Sec. Clinton was trying to put on a more energetic outlook or maybe she had too much coffee or maybe she had waited too long for her turn. Whatever it was, she looked manic to some people.
MineralMan
(146,286 posts)people. I'm not in that field. There are many other words that can be used that don't have medical connotations. You might feel otherwise.
thereismore
(13,326 posts)Splinter Cell
(703 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)So is Sanders but society looks down more on women past a certain age. She also has to tread a fine line that those of us of the male variety don't ever worry about -how to appear 'tough as a man' and still be herself. Younger generations of women find it easier to tread that line, I think.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Aspire to inspire.[/center][/font][hr]
MineralMan
(146,286 posts)I'm never "manic," though. She is a candidate for President. That's all that matters. Her gender has nothing to do with anything at all with regard to that.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)Almost looked like her team told her that Bernie's popularity was because he slaps the podium when he speaks, so she tried it.
Thing is it looks normal for Bernie because he always does it. With her it looked staged and contrived.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Mostly because I don't want to be seen as bullying or stalking you.
Please stop tempting me so much, I'm far from perfect and your own word choices are likewise not always totally appropriate.
Ignorance can be fixed, stupid is forever.
MineralMan
(146,286 posts)In fact, you have done so in this one. I suppose you're thinking about my 2008 statement, following Clinton's reference to RFK's assassination as a reason to remain in the race after it was clear she lost. I said, "Hillary is too stupid to be President." She said a stupid thing, hence my statement.
Since you chose not to quote me, I thought I'd quote myself. I felt that way at that time. It appears to me that she is very unlikely to repeat her stupid statement in this campaign, though.
Obama was the candidate I supported in 2008. Had Hillary Clinton won the nomination, I'd have supported her in the general election. I am a Democrat. I support Democratic candidates for President. I will continue that practice this year as well.
Replying in a DUer's threads does not constitute stalking. I would never suggest such a thing.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)And as I said, stupid is forever. You didn't call HRC's statement stupid, you called her stupid a small difference in language with a great difference in meaning and implications.
Now you are criticizing someone else's choice of words after remarkably unfortunate ones of your own.
I'm an actual bipolar and I don't find the old appellation all that derogatory, manic is not a bad lay description of some behaviors.
This place cracks me up nearly continually lately.
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)I choose to react with amusement which is what keeps me laughing a lot of the time on DU.
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)...thought he and I were tight. Guess not.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)What they do!
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)And my mother is a psych major. From what I've learned from both, I find that it's completely incorrect for anyone to label Clinton as manic. It's also offensive, because those who are bipolar have a very difficult time in their manic stages, which are incredibly frightening.
MineralMan
(146,286 posts)That may just be a slip of the tongue, or it could be an intentional usage. It's impossible to tell.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Seriously?
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)It's usually not a bad thing. I don't see alien creatures dancing on the table or anything like that. Some politicians get a little too animated, and it's a fine line between animated and manic.
ismnotwasm
(41,976 posts)And people want to poke with sharp sticks, either for attention or reaction.
Sexism often gets a pass. Even women will defend it, because it too often presents as a cultural norm and doesn't yet make people uncomfortable, doesn't make complacent or mono-focused people, even well-intentioned ones, question it, and it's a very useful tool for the thoroughly bad intentioned, because it's so well-accepted, especially in its subtler forms.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)Bleacher Creature
(11,256 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)English is such a fluid, nuanced and extensive language getting just the right flavor of meaning can be frustrating.
LexVegas
(6,059 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,674 posts)Remember the "Dean Scream"? Some in the media and elsewhere opined (wrongly) that he seemed unhinged, or manic, or whatever. It's not just a gender thing. Since I didn't see the town hall I have no opinion regarding Hillary in this instance, but "manic" behavior is often attributed to people of both genders when they seem tense or excited. It's an overstatement, IMO. Nothing wrong with seeming excited.
Beaverhausen
(24,470 posts)I will say the OP did delete, but not before a lot of ugliness ensued.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)MineralMan
(146,286 posts)Looks like that day has not yet arrived.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)Hillary is the cure!
Good catch on hateful words, MM! First, we have to recognize the problem.