2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumClinton Holds Wide Lead In National Poll...JANUARY 26, 2016
Clinton Holds Wide Lead In National Poll
By CONOR DINAN Published JANUARY 26, 2016, 4:09 PM EST
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton remains the clear national frontrunner in the race for the Democratic presidential nomination, according to an NBC/SurveyMonkey poll released Tuesday.
The NBC/SurveyMonkey Poll was carried out from Jan. 18-24. Pollsters surveyed 2,780 registered Democratic voters, with a margin of error of 2.8 percentage points.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/polltracker/clinton-leads-nbc-surveymonkey-dems
Perogie
(687 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Minnesota will eventually break for Bernie as well.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)I do believe he sees the writing on the wall.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)this is the guy that expected to see 300 people in Minneapolis in June and over 5,000 show up and he thought a rock star was in town.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Sanders appeared to lower expectations about his performance in the Iowa caucuses.
01/26/2016 04:30 pm ET
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/sanders-its-a-mythology-that-i-need-to-win-iowa_us_56a7e4a2e4b04936c0e89143
Straight from the man himself, dispute Bernie if you must.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)I guess reality is hitting Bernie first.
His followers will get it soon enough.
pnwmom
(108,977 posts)Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)You do need to be registered to vote in the General Election but you can register at the polls on election day.
I suspect the vast majority at the rally were registered voters, but even if they were not they can still vote in the caucuses.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)Guess all that ranting about it before was because it was pro sanders.
Oh how the turntables...
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)Hypocrisy, thy names are Clinton supporters.
cali
(114,904 posts)CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)He's not "tamping down" expectations in Iowa. Bernie was interviewed and he was asked if he absolutely had to win Iowa to get the nomination. He said that notion is, "mythology." He wasn't saying that he's not going to win Iowa. He wasn't adjusting expectations.
The writing on the wall is that you have a very active imagination.
He was asked if he could still win, without winning Iowa, and he said, HELL YES. I mean, what other answer is there?
I was present at one of his rallies earlier this week and he flat out said that we are winning in Iowa and we will win if his supporter turn out. That's been his message repeatedly for weeks. I've heard it, in person, a few times.
I had the privilege of meeting Bernie during a precinct captain meeting in my area. Bernie told all of us to be optimistic because the "inevitable" was no longer "inevitable." However, he stressed the importance of working hard to get turnout. He doesn't want us behaving as if we've got it in the bag. We're all operating as if we're 10 points behind.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Here's a clue, he was in St. Paul yesterday. He is in good shape in Iowa.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)FTW!
...heh.
litlbilly
(2,227 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)20,000 plus showed up at the rally it was supposed to start at 7:00 pm, but it is really really hard to get that many people seated. BTW they started seating people an hour or more before the scheduled time.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)I guess there' something here about how they did it, but it's still an ONLINE POLL.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)really are a piece of work, collectively.
You seem to be hell bent on mocking, belittling and pouring cold water on Sanders supporters.
No matter what the good news is--a favorable poll for Bernie or a well-attended rally--you are always around with your snippy comments.
This stuff doesn't work. Bernie has gone from 4 percent to WINNING in Iowa. According to the latest Quinnipiac that came out today, Bernie is ahead of Clinton by 4. That's huge.
Within 5 days, the comment will be "Yeah, but he only won one little Iowa caucus! FTW! ...heh."
Also, you mock Bernie winning online pols and big rallies. Clinton has none of that. She can't even muster a rally that is well attended. She resorts to gimmicks like free concerts with Demi Lovato and Katy Perry to try to boost her numbers. Now, she's got Bill out on the trail with her. I attended her downtown Des Moines rally. There were 350 people there. That's being generous. In the same building, Clinton held a 2008 rally and 2000+ attended. She's just not getting it done this year.
You might want to check your attitude a bit. Making fun of Bernie for doing well in polls and rallies--when your candidate is tanking in those categories--is bizarre.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)and just hang out and enjoy cooling down. When my body temp slides to 106 or so, I resume my shopping.
Good times.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)riversedge
(70,200 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)is really important, she thinks about others besides herself.
riversedge
(70,200 posts)those 4 years working as SOS has helped her--We the US can not go alone--and as President she will need support in Congress and abroad.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Money isn't votes.
IllinoisBrenel
(51 posts)Her nation wide lead is actually narrowing!
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)As I recall, Hillary was totally inevitable in 2008. Why, then, are we not in the waning months of her second term?
pnwmom
(108,977 posts)As opposed to the current situation, that has Hillary strongly leading in "definitely" and Bernie with the same advantage among the "probable" voters.
oasis
(49,379 posts)with this powerful and accomplished woman's ability to listen.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)You realize the entire world saw the fact that she hosted ANOTHER corporate fundraiser... Not even days before Iowa...
oasis
(49,379 posts)If she participates in a fund raiser 2 hours before the polls open so what?
If there is some sort of moratorium in place for a fund raising period, it exists only in the minds of Bernie supporters.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)is honey from a poisoned hive due to where her money comes from. I was too young to fight Citizens United when it passed, what were you doing at that time? How complicit are you in the money grubbery of politicians?
oasis
(49,379 posts)the American people by the Supreme Court, so there was little anyone could do.
That's why it's very important Democrats retain the White House, because 2 or 3 vacancies will occur on the Supreme Court within the next few years.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)Quinnipiac is a sound, reliable poll--which uses similar methodology as The Iowa Poll.
This is a really big deal.
This is the same margin that Obama went into the Iowa caucuses with. Obama was ahead by 3.
The candidate who goes into the Iowa caucuses with the momentum and the polls on their side, always has the advantage. Always.
Because some caucus-goers are persuadable. And they're not going to be "persuaded" to a losing side. They're going to go with the winner, nearly every time.
Bernie couldn't be better positioned to win the Iowa caucuses. He's ahead, and he's got momentum going in--and her numbers are eroding.
oasis
(49,379 posts)So we'll just have to sit back, wait and see what happens.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)The Iowa Poll and the Quinnipiac Poll are strong indicators of the Iowa caucus outcomes. Both use the same methodology. And The Iowa Poll predicted Obama's win.
There are things that we do know about the Iowa caucuses.
1.) The candidate going in with momentum (rising in the polls) has a distinct advantage.
2.) The candidate ahead in the polls has a distinct advantage (for obvious reasons).
Bernie has both.
Sanders started out at 4 percent in Iowa. He's now ahead by 4. There's just no denying that her campaign is on a downward trend and Sanders is on an upward trend.
The "persuadables" who show up at the Iowa caucuses will no doubt go with the candidate who is wining the room. That's just what happens. And if Bernie has a lot of enthusiasm and numbers, he could even steal away further support from her.
That "mercurial" aspect of the Iowa caucuses favors the candidate who is ahead in the polls and who has the momentum going in, so most of the shifts and volatility that does happen that night will favor Sanders.
oasis
(49,379 posts)as the saying goes, "The proof is in the Podunks".
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)It all depends on turnout, really.
I think each camp is working day/night to ensure that their supporters are there.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)Hmmmmm.......
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)And yet whenever someone points it out, they're immediately a radical leftist extremist and a conspiracy theorist.
livetohike
(22,140 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)I may be wrong, and if so I am sure you will remind me.
However, Sanders losing by a few points is much more of a win for him than Clinton losing by a few points.
Clinton is on much thinner ice than Sanders is.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)But, that's what you do to rally the troops.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)That's helpful.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)That's what my parents called him.
My Mom, a 67 year old Baby Boomer thought was all Hill, until her daughter, me, showed her the difference.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)I had never seen him live, in all these years... until 2010 I think. He came to a huge outdoor concert venue very close by in the summer.. in fact the same place where a band I led opened for the band that opened for Carlos Santana.... :> )
I got 2 seats for Dylan up front, in about the 15th row. I was almost in tears when he walked out.
Good for you and your mom.
longship
(40,416 posts)Which is incremental and granular, one or a few states at a time.
National polls are rubbish, even after the nominations, they are meaningless as long as we nominate and elect our presidents by 50 statewide elections.
Quoting national polls, especially this early, is just spin.
My regards.
WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)at this point. If Iowa and NH go to Bernie you will suddenly see a lot of states tighten.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)Not any more.
Lets see how Iowa turns out and then we can talk about the meaningless national numbers again.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)Iliyah
(25,111 posts)and in no way HRC could win the primary nor GE pursuant to them . Again double standard regardless.
K & R
floriduck
(2,262 posts)Meanwhile, the rest of the party will gradually work their way over to the candidate making a difference and gaining ground. Only one person is gaining so watch the money and endorsements begin to shift Bernie's direction once he takes Iowa and Anaheim.
Bejrn on!
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)South Carolina is right around the corner and then super tuesday when Hillary locks up the nomination.
Bernies a loser.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Get ready to eat your words.