Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

AtomicKitten

(46,585 posts)
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 05:09 PM Jan 2016

Hillary's Dirty Campaign Tactics circa 2008 - Sought to Suppress the Vote of Rivals' Supporters.

NEWS & POLITICS
Hillary Clinton's Dirty Campaign Tactics
In Iowa, New Hampshire and now Nevada, the Clinton campaign has sought to suppress the vote of her rivals' supporters.

By Steven Rosenfeld / AlterNet January 14, 2008
link: http://www.alternet.org/story/73782/hillary_clinton's_dirty_campaign_tactics

The headlines say the latest schism among the top Democratic presidential candidates is over gender and race. But on the ground in the presidential season's opening states, there is a darker narrative: that Hillary Clinton will not just fight hard, but fight dirty, to win. And her tactic of choice is attempting to suppress the votes of her rival's supporters.

The latest example is from Nevada, where the Nevada State Education Association is widely seen as filing a suit on Clinton's behalf to stop Las Vegas' most powerful union, Culinary Workers Local 226, from caucusing inside downtown casinos after the union endorsed Barack Obama. The tactic foments a split along racial and class lines in arguably the strongest union city in America.

"It's horrible," said one longtime Nevada activist, who didn't want his name used. "It will cause fights and damage that will last for years."

But the Clinton campaign has made similar moves in New Hampshire and Iowa.

In the first primary state, her supporters -- backed by New Hampshire Democratic Party officials -- pressured poll workers to remove observers stationed by the Obama campaign. These volunteers had intended to track voters as part of their get-out-the-vote effort. That tactic came after the Clinton campaign sent a mailing targeting women that said Obama would not "stand up and protect" a women's right to choose because he had voted "present" -- but not yes -- on a few abortion-related bills in the Illinois legislature.

"I've kept most mailers I got from every presidential candidate this year, and that mailer was the absolute worst," wrote New Hampshire blogger Peter Glenshaw. "Never mind that Obama has a 100 percent approval rating from Planned Parenthood in Illinois. Never mind that Planned Parenthood asked him to vote 'present' on those bills."

And in Iowa, the Clinton campaign -- with the help of the state's largest newspaper, the Des Moines Register, which endorsed her -- was discouraging students from returning from winter break to vote, even though their right to do so was legal, said Rick Hasen, who writes a respected election law blog. "Indeed such voting could help to compensate for the otherwise anti-democratic nature of Iowa's role in the presidential election process," he said.

As the nomination process has unfolded and Clinton has encountered resistance in every state so far -- including Obama's Friday endorsement by the 60,000-member Las Vegas Culinary Workers Union -- her campaign's increasingly critical rhetoric has been accompanied by voter suppression tactics aimed at her rival's core voters.

While Clinton campaign surrogates have verbally accused Obama of many things, from "fairy tale" answers on Iraq to being a drug user while they served the country more nobly, intentionally suppressing voters -- especially under-represented, low-income minority union members -- stands out in 2008's Democratic presidential campaign.

After all, the Democratic National Committee moved Nevada's caucuses to the top of the primary lineup so minority voices could be heard -- and no organization is more aligned with those voters in Nevada than the Culinary Union, whose training materials for its members are printed in four languages. In contrast, the state teachers, whose suit seeks to stop those workers from caucusing in nine "at-large" precincts in big downtown casinos, have a statewide base because its members work throughout Nevada.

The NSEA suit claims the at-large casino caucuses are not fair to the state's other voters because they will likely be overrun with voters, thereby skewing the proportional representation of Clark County delegates to the state party convention.

Neither NSEA officials nor their Las Vegas lawyers returned calls on Monday. However their suit states that "by packing as much as 10 percent or more delegates into the county convention, the at-large precinct caucus system (created for the casinos) substantially diminishes the voting power of delegates from other county precinct caucuses."

In other words, a strong turnout from the tens of thousands of Culinary Workers Union members in Las Vegas, where 70 percent of Nevada voters live, could swing the state's early foray into presidential politics. In 2000, fewer than 1,000 people participated in Nevada's caucuses. In 2004, that number was about 9,000. This year, estimates are in the tens of thousands.

Nevada political insiders say the NSEA lawsuit is designed to suppress Obama's voters.

"That's the common narrative at this point," said Pilar Weiss, the Culinary Workers Union's political director, when asked if there was any other way to interpret the suit. "A caucus system is all proportional representation. It's not unfair in any way. They (the state Democratic Party) made an accommodation for Clark County."

Another Nevada activist who has worked for years in the state was even blunter.

"This (caucus) plan was created by some of the same people who are plaintiffs in the suit against it," he said. "It's not that they didn't like the plan when Clinton was ahead."

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary's Dirty Campaign Tactics circa 2008 - Sought to Suppress the Vote of Rivals' Supporters. (Original Post) AtomicKitten Jan 2016 OP
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Jan 2016 #1
ty AtomicKitten Jan 2016 #7
Cheers to you. Uncle Joe Jan 2016 #12
The sleaze never stops. n/t Skwmom Jan 2016 #2
Note the accusations and excoriations flying today. AtomicKitten Jan 2016 #4
I guess this won't be an issue this year: Jarqui Jan 2016 #3
she's accusing Bernie of busing students in just like she accused Obama AtomicKitten Jan 2016 #5
Yep Jarqui Jan 2016 #6
Second verse; same as the first. VulgarPoet Jan 2016 #10
The media has to blow the whistle on her ... Jarqui Jan 2016 #11
LOL. The best defense is a good offense, huh? Or in this case, a lousy offense... DanTex Jan 2016 #8
Historical facts are mean to Hillary. AtomicKitten Jan 2016 #9
deja vu all over again Paulie Jan 2016 #13
 

AtomicKitten

(46,585 posts)
4. Note the accusations and excoriations flying today.
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 07:55 PM
Jan 2016

It's subterfuge. It's what the Clinton campaign does with sleight of hand. With the historical record of all kinds of their shenanigans (the OP just an example), we can be sure the sequel is in progress. With stellar examples of Mark Penn behind the scenes and David Brock on her team, new lows will almost certainly be reached. Watch this space.

edited

Jarqui

(10,123 posts)
3. I guess this won't be an issue this year:
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 05:31 PM
Jan 2016
(2008) the Des Moines Register, which endorsed her -- was discouraging students from returning from winter break to vote, even though their right to do so was legal,


All the students will be back and able to vote. Can't be a bad thing for Bernie.

Bernie won the youth straw poll 53.5-30
http://sos.iowa.gov/youth/studentmockelection/results.aspx

VulgarPoet

(2,872 posts)
10. Second verse; same as the first.
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 10:10 PM
Jan 2016

"Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it." -- George Santayana.

Jarqui

(10,123 posts)
11. The media has to blow the whistle on her ...
Thu Jan 28, 2016, 10:13 PM
Jan 2016

and we're good.

If they turn a blind eye, it's gonna get tough.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary's Dirty Campaign ...