Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 12:01 AM Jan 2016

AARP must be very touchy. Told Obama 2012 to stop "citing" them. What?

Why wouldn't an organization want to be cited? Why wouldn't they want publicity?

AARP to Obama: Stop citing us

AARP has a message for President Obama: Stop using us to score political points.

Obama cited the nonpartisan senior lobby twice in Wednesday's debate when arguing against Mitt Romney's Medicare proposals.

The remarks prompted a polite statement from AARP Senior Vice President John Hishta asking candidates to refrain from mentioning the group.

"AARP has never consented to the use of its name by any candidate or political campaign," Hishta said.

"AARP is a nonpartisan organization, and we do not endorse political candidates nor coordinate with any candidate or political party."

Hishta sent a similar dispatch in August, when the Obama campaign released an ad using AARP quotes to attack Paul Ryan's Medicare policy.


Good grief that's not very bright. An organization pushing policy doesn't want a presidential candidate to refer to their policy. Blows my mind.
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
AARP must be very touchy. Told Obama 2012 to stop "citing" them. What? (Original Post) madfloridian Jan 2016 OP
AND I have searched and searched for the mailing in which Bernie misused AARP logo. madfloridian Jan 2016 #1
The people who repeatedly post these Bullshit OPs here should be flagged. At least one a day. TheBlackAdder Jan 2016 #9
Do you have a link ... NanceGreggs Jan 2016 #2
There is a link in the OP. Shows how touchy. Where's the pic of the misuse of the logo? madfloridian Jan 2016 #3
The link says nothing ... NanceGreggs Jan 2016 #6
Way to misread the subject line and OP madfloridian Jan 2016 #8
Where's the link to Bernie using their logo? I'm sure you have one, as you are rightly sabrina 1 Jan 2016 #14
I just searched again. Nothing shows up at all. madfloridian Jan 2016 #17
There's a common thread in these two stories if there is any truth to this one. Hillary. sabrina 1 Jan 2016 #18
Here ya go! NanceGreggs Jan 2016 #23
What nonsense... ljm2002 Jan 2016 #10
The OP is about ... NanceGreggs Jan 2016 #11
I think the Obama thing was about a .5 on the scale... ljm2002 Jan 2016 #12
The only hysteria I've seen ... NanceGreggs Jan 2016 #13
Well then, I'd say you have blinders on. n/t ljm2002 Jan 2016 #15
Please provide a link to 'Bernie using their logo' everyone has been searching for it all day. sabrina 1 Jan 2016 #20
AARP is a 501(c)(4) nonprofit "social welfare" organization The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2016 #4
Well, they sure did, didn't they? madfloridian Jan 2016 #5
Except no one seems to be able to provide a link to this claim of Bernie using their logo sabrina 1 Jan 2016 #22
Look what I found Cartoonist Jan 2016 #7
AARP is only obliquely an advocacy group. longship Jan 2016 #16
They are a nonpartisan org committed to not endorsing anyone. pnwmom Jan 2016 #19
They didn't even want Obama to mention their research. I mean, really now. madfloridian Jan 2016 #21

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
1. AND I have searched and searched for the mailing in which Bernie misused AARP logo.
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 12:06 AM
Jan 2016

No one seems to have a picture of it.

TheBlackAdder

(28,182 posts)
9. The people who repeatedly post these Bullshit OPs here should be flagged. At least one a day.
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 12:22 AM
Jan 2016

.


It's one thing to post valid discourse, it's another to try and deceive DU readers with crap!


These seem to be promoted by the same set of userids.


.


NanceGreggs

(27,813 posts)
2. Do you have a link ...
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 12:06 AM
Jan 2016

... to where the AARP had to tell Obama to stop using their logo without their permission?

TIA!

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
14. Where's the link to Bernie using their logo? I'm sure you have one, as you are rightly
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 01:39 AM
Jan 2016

concerned about proof. I've searched can't find it. Thanks in advance.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
18. There's a common thread in these two stories if there is any truth to this one. Hillary.
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 02:01 AM
Jan 2016

Hillary/Obama/AARP and now Bernie/Obama/AARP

NanceGreggs

(27,813 posts)
23. Here ya go!
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 04:47 AM
Jan 2016
http://states.aarp.org/aarp-statement-in-response-to-sanders-mailing/

Of course, you might want to argue that the AARP were responding to something that didn't happen - because they're now part of "the Establishment" and all.

ljm2002

(10,751 posts)
10. What nonsense...
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 12:48 AM
Jan 2016

...the OP never made such a claim.

A lot of people here are trying to make a mountain out of this molehill. There are various levels of seriousness to campaign missteps. On a scale of 1 to 10 I'd rate this at about 1.5.

NanceGreggs

(27,813 posts)
11. The OP is about ...
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 01:20 AM
Jan 2016

... the AARP "being touchy" - which I assume was prompted by today's news that Bernie's campaign used their logo without authorization.

However, the OP talks about Obama being told not to "cite" the AARP, and says nothing about using their logo without permission.

Why is everything Bernie does a "molehill", while everything HRC does is a mountain?

Things that make you go hmmmmm ...

I've no doubt that if Hillary's campaign used the AARP logo without authorization, we'd be talking about an outraged, OMG!!!-style 11 on that scale of 1 to 10.

ljm2002

(10,751 posts)
12. I think the Obama thing was about a .5 on the scale...
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 01:25 AM
Jan 2016

...if that.

I can't speak for others, but if Hillary's campaign had made the same misstep I'd give it the same rating of 1.5. Really, it isn't much of a thing at all. Bernie's campaign used a logo (well apparently it used a photo of AARP members whose t-shirts had the logo), AARP said stop it, the campaign said okay, the end.

And yet Hillary's supporters would have us translate this into "OMG they have no ethics! OMG his whole campaign has gone rogue!" and the like. The level of hysteria of course shows that Hillary's supporters are feeling more than a little touchy these days. JMHO.

NanceGreggs

(27,813 posts)
13. The only hysteria I've seen ...
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 01:35 AM
Jan 2016

... is coming from BSers who insist that facts about BS's campaign tactics are "smears", while smears about HRC being imminently indicted over her emails are "facts".

Not to worry. It will all be over quite soon. Then we can deal with the "votes were rigged" posts when Bernie goes down for the count.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
20. Please provide a link to 'Bernie using their logo' everyone has been searching for it all day.
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 02:03 AM
Jan 2016

If you have it, then please provide it. But there is something intereting about this AARP 'story, a common link.

Obama/HILLARY/AARP and now Bernie/HILLARY/AARP.

Somethng to ponder. With smearmonger David Brock working for Hillary caught several times now spewing lies about Bernie Sanders, anything is possible. What a vile creature for a woman who claims to support women to have on her team.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,661 posts)
4. AARP is a 501(c)(4) nonprofit "social welfare" organization
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 12:08 AM
Jan 2016

and as such is not allowed to engage in directly supporting any political campaigns or candidates. They are probably trying to protect their tax-exempt nonprofit status (assuming this happened and wasn't an act of ratfucking).

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
22. Except no one seems to be able to provide a link to this claim of Bernie using their logo
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 02:06 AM
Jan 2016

People have been searching all day, i've asked the 'accusers' but got no response. So until we see it, it's just another smear added to all the others that are coming from Hillary's campaign like a tsunami, kind of like 'let's throw poo at the wall and see what sticks'.

It isn't sticking, people are familiar with these old dirty campaign trics. Still waiting for proof.

longship

(40,416 posts)
16. AARP is only obliquely an advocacy group.
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 01:53 AM
Jan 2016

They are first, and foremost, an insurance company. That's what they exist for, marketing insurance to retirees.

pnwmom

(108,973 posts)
19. They are a nonpartisan org committed to not endorsing anyone.
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 02:02 AM
Jan 2016

What part of this is hard to understand?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»AARP must be very touchy....