Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

John Poet

(2,510 posts)
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 12:07 AM Jan 2016

A Crazy Establishment Demands ‘Sanity’ From Voters- Consortiumnews.com

Exclusive: As support grows for anti-Establishment candidates Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump, a frantic Establishment is demanding that Americans “stay sane” and vote for one of its approved candidates. But is it sane to follow advice that has led to endless wars and a disappearing middle class, asks Robert Parry.

By Robert Parry

With ever-growing hysteria, the Establishment is begging, cajoling and warning American voters not to elect a rogue President from the Right or the Left, neither Donald Trump nor Bernie Sanders, but to accept instead one of the “sane” mainstream options. Yet, the unspoken truth is that the American Establishment has been off its rocker for decades.

It was, after all, Official Washington’s Establishment – led by the neoconservatives and their sidekicks, the liberal interventionists – that embraced President George W. Bush’s catastrophic invasion of Iraq in 2003. However, as costly as that decision was in terms of blood and money and cascading chaos – now destabilizing Europe – the Wise Men and Women imposed virtually zero accountability on themselves or other chief culprits.

Indeed, many of the same neocons who architected the Iraq disaster are listed as top foreign policy advisers to the “sane” candidates, such as Marco Rubio and Jeb Bush. And Hillary Clinton not only voted for the Iraq War but seemed to learn no lessons from what she only grudgingly acknowledged was a “mistake.” As Secretary of State, she sided with Democratic “liberal interventionists” to engineer another “regime change” in Libya that has led to another failed state, further spreading chaos across the region.

A “sane” Establishment, one that truly cared about the interests of the American people, would have undertaken a serious self-examination after the Iraq War. Yet, there was none. Rather than cleaning house and banishing the neocons and liberal interventionists to the farthest reaches of national power, the Establishment rewarded these warmongers, ceding to them near-total control of American foreign policy thinking.

If anything, the neocons and liberal hawks consolidated their power after the Iraq War. By contrast, the foreign policy “realists” and anti-war progressives who warned against the invasion were the ones cast out of any positions of influence. How crazy is that!

It was as if supporting the Iraq War was the new initiation rite to join the Establishment’s elite fraternity of worthies, a kind of upside-down application of rewards and punishments that would only make sense at the Mad Hatter’s tea party in Alice’s Wonderland.

:::snip:::

Rather than fight to convince the white working class about the need for democratic governance, Bill Clinton and other neo-liberals fashioned a strategy of catering to Wall Street and other rich donors by offering “free market” financial deregulation and “free trade” deals on manufacturing.

Sanders represents the first candidate for president in recent memory who has offered a full-throated defense of government as a necessary counter-balance to the power of the rich over both the economy and the electoral process (though President Obama has paid some lip service to those principles).

By contrast, Hillary Clinton represents a continuation of the cozy relations between the so-called New Democrats and the wealthy power centers of high finance and big corporations

She also advocates foreign military interventions in line with what the neocons have sought as they demand U.S. fealty to Israeli interests.

Read more:
https://consortiumnews.com/2016/01/27/a-crazy-establishment-demands-sanity/


4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A Crazy Establishment Demands ‘Sanity’ From Voters- Consortiumnews.com (Original Post) John Poet Jan 2016 OP
Sanity of the People RobertEarl Jan 2016 #1
"I'm MAD AS HELL, and I'm NOT going to take it anymore!" John Poet Jan 2016 #2
They may demand all they wish, it's always worked well. Before Bernie. Autumn Jan 2016 #3
We'll see how sane we are tonight. John Poet Feb 2016 #4
 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
1. Sanity of the People
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 12:31 AM
Jan 2016

We've had enough of the warmongering. Electing Obama was our first step in showing we'd had enough.

These days the establishment press does not speak of the wars and destruction they supported. "Bush knew" is verboten to the press, and he and his criminals are never mentioned.

Obama, to his credit, has managed to hold the country on an even keel as the republican hordes banged on his doors.

But the People have a good memory and we have not forgotten. That is why Bernie is gaining so fast and why he will be the next president.

We've had enough and we're not going to take any more crap from the establishment.

 

John Poet

(2,510 posts)
2. "I'm MAD AS HELL, and I'm NOT going to take it anymore!"
Fri Jan 29, 2016, 12:41 AM
Jan 2016

I hope enough people feel that way, and they turn out and vote.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»A Crazy Establishment Dem...