Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Lee Fang (@lhfang): E-mail about Hillary initiative to promote American fracking globally (Original Post) kgnu_fan Mar 2016 OP
Did you see this? jillan Mar 2016 #1
kick kgnu_fan Mar 2016 #2
You vote is YOUR vote to do with whatever you wish.nt nc4bo Mar 2016 #10
K & R &... AzDar Mar 2016 #3
Direct link to PDF Mufaddal Mar 2016 #4
It's been mentioned here but didn't get the attention it deserves. senz Mar 2016 #5
Fuck that. It's an issue. Armstead Mar 2016 #7
For a minute there I thought senz Mar 2016 #8
kick kgnu_fan Mar 2016 #11
"See ya later!" TCJ70 Mar 2016 #6
Well, she did work for Obama ... Onlooker Mar 2016 #9

jillan

(39,451 posts)
1. Did you see this?
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 12:31 AM
Mar 2016
http://m.motherjones.com/environment/2014/09/hillary-clinton-fracking-shale-state-department-chevron

The episode sheds light on a crucial but little-known dimension of Clinton's diplomatic legacy. Under her leadership, the State Department worked closely with energy companies to spread fracking around the globe—part of a broader push to fight climate change, boost global energy supply, and undercut the power of adversaries such as Russia that use their energy resources as a cudgel. But environmental groups fear that exporting fracking, which has been linked to drinking-water contamination and earthquakes at home, could wreak havoc in countries with scant environmental regulation. And according to interviews, diplomatic cables, and other documents obtained by Mother Jones, American officials—some with deep ties to industry—also helped US firms clinch potentially lucrative shale concessions overseas, raising troubling questions about whose interests the program actually serves




Please tell me I don't have to vote for her.
 

senz

(11,945 posts)
5. It's been mentioned here but didn't get the attention it deserves.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 01:14 AM
Mar 2016

It should be on the MSM. People need to know who Hillary is and what she does.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
7. Fuck that. It's an issue.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 01:20 AM
Mar 2016

What matters is who has the momentum. What the candidates actually do means nothing.

Get your mind right..

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
8. For a minute there I thought
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 02:37 AM
Mar 2016

you were angry with me, but now I see that you wrote that sarcastically. Yes, the emphasis on momentum is disgusting; it treats the election process as a sport. Some talk about Hillary and Bernie as if they were mere horses in a race and this is some kind of win/lose contest. Incredibly shallow and juvenile. It's a drag conversing with people who hold that attitude.

How can we get the MSM to talk about Hillary's pushing fracking on various 3rd world countries? Or maybe it could be spread by social media. It needs to travel far and wide, so people can know who she is and what she does.

If they do force their way into the nomination, it won't be over for us. Bernie will see it through to the end and then I would expect him to continue launching a movement. This is not going to go away.

Take heart, Armstead. We're up to it.



Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Lee Fang (@lhfang): E-mai...