2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumMark my words: it will be Clinton/Warren in 2016
There's a reason she hasnt endorsed yet, she is going to bridge the divide. http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/elizabeth-warren-clinton-sanders-massachusetts-primary-220007
Feel free to bookmark this op.
Logical
(22,457 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)revbones
(3,660 posts)brooklynite
(94,502 posts)"All all of the women Democratic women I should say of the Senate urged Hillary Clinton to run, and I hope she does. Hillary is terrific," Warren said during an interview broadcast Sunday on ABC's "This Week," noting that she was one of several senators to sign a letter urging Clinton to run in 2016.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2014/04/27/elizabeth-warren-i-hope-hillary-clinton-runs-for-president/
This isn't news.
revbones
(3,660 posts)brooklynite
(94,502 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)After all, Elizabeth was their first choice. They settled for Sanders.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)There are many varied reasons to never ever vote for Hillary. We have a diversity of reasons to choose from.
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)Mrs. Clinton is the one with the personality cult.
litlbilly
(2,227 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)nichomachus
(12,754 posts)Hillary is going to have a VP who is smarter than she is, more popular than she is, and more honest than she is. Not - gonna - happen.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)You don't actually think either Warren or Sanders really feel about Clinton the way the DU Sanders brigade does, do you?
Oh, that's hilarious. You're being used and you don't even realize it. That's very cute.
Anyways: Warren would be more than happy to be her VP pick. For that matter so would Sanders, though that's less of a good choice.
litlbilly
(2,227 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)And why did she encourage Clinton to run in the first place?
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)Still put me down for Castro.
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)Warren would be tied to Hillary's policies. I doubt she wants that anchor around her neck.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)For Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren would probably be the first person he asks, and he'd probably only consider other choices if she says No.
For Hillary Clinton, Elizabeth Warren would probably be one of 15 people on a list of possible VPs.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)NT
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)It looks and is great. I'd love to see A LOT more of this. You would not think for a minute if it was five men in the picture.
Too bad these particular women - Jarrett, Rice, Clinton, Power behind them - are in the business of creating wars. Always with humanitarian justifications of course. We came, we saw, he died, ha ha ha. Also, Power is the one who called Clinton a "monster." But anyway.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)The implication was that Clinton was more willing to hire a woman as VP because she likes working with women. That is sexist.
I agree with the rest of your post.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)You don't double down on liberal New Englanders. He'd get somebody from the west or south, and from the other end of the ideological spectrum. Landrieu or something (southerner, conservative, crucial in getting ACA passed -- it's actually a decent idea).
NV Whino
(20,886 posts)Autumn
(45,056 posts)http://www.huffingtonpost.com/liam-miller/elizabeth-warren-sinks-clintons-hopes_b_9058526.html?
Out of the 2 candidates on our side that only seems to fit one of them. And that sure as hell isn't Bernie.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)I heard HA Goodman has one too!
Autumn
(45,056 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)And using it to attack another candidate based on no evidence is not only shallow, but an insult to Liz.
Autumn
(45,056 posts)who stands by what she says and believes. Unlike Hillary who backtracks frequently on what she says. Again. Nice try but you missed. Anyway I'm bored with this conversation so bye.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)The quoted sentence was the thesis statement of the speech.
By the way, the author of the above video is not "youtube.com." I know some people seem to have (selective!) difficulties with the idea that the location of a web page does not always indicate the value or meaning of the content.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Are rightwingers. Seriously.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)THAT is what you just said.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)who can either get her a state or a demographic she needs to strengthen.
I cannot wait for the day a two women team is no big deal!
kstewart33
(6,551 posts)whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)I don't think the folks who are purchasing Clinton have much love for Warren. She's the last person they want waiting in the wings.
Arazi
(6,829 posts)elleng
(130,865 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)If Warren wanted to be President, she could have run.
She has an agenda she wants to pass in the Senate, but needs a Democratic President, Senate, and House.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Because Clinton will choose someone for a strategic value who will help with a significant constituency. I think her VP will be an Hispanic.
I thing three should be two women tickets, just as I agree with Ginsburg that there will be enough women on the Supreme Court When there are nine of them. If you can have two men tickets and nine men on the supreme court, why not.
It won't happen this time. The country is changing and shift left, but we have a ways to go.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)And remember the VP has considerable power in the Senate, in some senses more than an individual Senator would.
kerry-is-my-prez
(8,133 posts)Although she may decide she really needs someone progressive. I could see her trying to get Sanders. Sanders may feel that he is needed to be in a leadership position and not go back to just being a senator. It's hard enough to get a woman elected much less two on the ticket.
I hope you're right though - this is a one of a kind election......
7wo7rees
(5,128 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)They can also be major allies that get some good stuff enacted.
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)I like Warren a lot,, but even she can't make me stomach Clinton
NBachers
(17,104 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)...
tularetom
(23,664 posts)If Warren hasn't endorsed anybody yet, she isn't going endorse anybody period.
She has a lot of credibility in the party now, the minute she makes an endorsement, she pisses off half the party and whooosh, the credibility is gone.
McCamy Taylor
(19,240 posts)self confidence. I really like Julian Castro and hope she goes with him. But I can get on board Clinton/Warren, too.
longship
(40,416 posts)Even after she had said multiple times that she was not interested.
I'll bet my bottom dollar that she wouldn't say yes to this either.
Plus, although I am not supporting Hillary for the nomination, even she knows better than to select Warren as Veep. Why don't people here?