Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eridani

(51,907 posts)
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 05:38 AM Mar 2016

The difference betweent he Congressional Black Caucus PAC and--

--the Congressional Black Caucus. From the Color of Change listserv.

Did you hear about the Congressional Black Caucus PAC endorsement?

The Congressional Black Caucus Political Action Committee is a Washington, DC-based group that claims to speak for Black people, but is really a mouthpiece for corporate power. Although it bears the name of the Congressional Black Caucus, the CBC PAC’s 21-member board only includes 8 of the 46 Black Caucus members. Shockingly, the majority of the board is made up of lobbyists representing various corporate interests.

Will you join me in demanding that the CBC PAC remake their board to reflect CBC leadership and cut ties with corporations that do harm to Black people?

http://act.colorofchange.org/sign/end-corporate-dominance-cpcpac/?sp_ref=177157352.176.159862.e.502918.2

Two weeks ago, the Congressional Black Caucus PAC, with it's lobbyist-dominated Board of Directors2, made a high-profile endorsement of Hilary Clinton and quietly decided not to endorse, fellow CBC member, Rep. Donna Edwards' historic bid to become only the second Black woman to be elected to the Senate.

The lobbyists sitting on the CBC PAC’s board represent the worst of the worst -- companies that are notorious in the mistreatment and exploitation of Black people. The depth of corporate influence over the CBC PAC is so troubling because its endorsements carry the name of the Congressional Black Caucus, trading off a name that is wrapped in the moral authority of the civil rights movement. For hours, media incorrectly reported that the Congressional Black Caucus and not the CBC PAC endorsed Secretary Hillary Clinton for President.3 Meanwhile, the CBC PAC's corporate board members and donors who represent private prisons, big tobacco and the anti-worker National Restaurant Association were nowhere to be seen. This is wrong and the CBC must act to stop it now.


6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
1. Is "corporate" supposed to be frightening or something? There are lots of black-owned businesses
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:48 AM
Mar 2016

And the CBC PAC is one of the committees many of them donate to.

Here's the CBC PAC board:

http://www.cbcpac.org/leadership

Like just about every leadership PAC in Congress, the board is composed of a few legislators and several lobbyists, fundraisers, and consultants. Just in this case they're all black.

eridani

(51,907 posts)
2. The problem is that so many have the impression that the actual Black Caucus--
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 03:56 AM
Mar 2016

--has endorsed Clinton. They haven't.

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
6. Not frightening, just that they have different interests (like making money).
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 04:16 AM
Mar 2016

Kind of like the Clintons. And people need to know where they are coming from.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The difference betweent h...