Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:07 PM Mar 2016

Keep this information in perspective as you learn the primary results:

Last edited Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:47 PM - Edit history (1)

Last time these states voted for a Democrat in a presidential elect was 1964:

Idaho
Kansas
Montana
Nebraska
North Dakota
Oklahoma
Utah
Wyoming


Last time these states voted for a Democrat in a presidential elect was 1976:

Alabama
Mississippi
Missouri
S. Carolina
S. Dakota


Last time these states voted for a Democrat in a presidential elect was 1992:

Georgia


Last time these states voted for a Democrat in a presidential elect was 1996 (20 years ago):

Arkansas
Arizona
Kentucky
Louisiana
Tennessee
W. Virginia

We are not going to win in November if we make a big deal of the outcomes in those states. And many of those states vote early in the season.

Keep in mind that 1996 is 20 years ago.

On edit and after corrections from DUers for which I am grateful, I took N. Carolina off this list. They voted for Obama in 2008.

Thanks to the DUers who pointed this mistake out.

I have a list and wrote 2008 for N. Carolina as well as 1976 as the most recent previous election in which N. Carolina voted for a Democratic president, but when I posted this, I could not read my own handwriting. I have a bit of a tremor so this happens to me -- that I cannot read my own writing. My tremor is familial and intentional, not Parkinsons.

Thanks.

Keep this in mind as results come in.

Note that Virginia is not on this list. They have become swing state voters.

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

PyaarRevolution

(814 posts)
1. But Bernie with the nom.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:10 PM
Mar 2016

Has a real chance of winning Alabama, Mississippi and Kansas. I'm a native Kansan and think Bernie can definitely win.

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
2. The bigger deal that is made out of red states going to not Bernie, the more money I'll send
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:11 PM
Mar 2016

to his campaign.

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
3. Include Alaska in that first category,
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:12 PM
Mar 2016

but there is a lot of enthusiasm for Bernie here. Hillary will undoubtedly lose.

amborin

(16,631 posts)
5. exactly, and more here:
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:13 PM
Mar 2016






This gives a right-leaning (charitable, here) candidate an edge over a more liberal candidate.

And gives them an edge in the overall outcome;

(thanks to hifiguy, who articulated this insight in a different OP! and to Octafish, whose OP, Super Tuesday Whistles Dixie, focuses on this)

DemocraticWing

(1,290 posts)
6. Bernie can't win the nomination without the first batch of states you mentioned.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:14 PM
Mar 2016

This talking point shoots our own campaign in the foot.

BumRushDaShow

(128,898 posts)
7. "Last time these states voted for a Democrat in a presidential elect was 1976"
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:14 PM
Mar 2016
Alabama
Mississippi
Missouri
N. Carolina
S. Carolina
S. Dakota


Try N. Carolina for Obama in 2008.



obamanut2012

(26,068 posts)
8. NC voted for Obama in 2008
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:17 PM
Mar 2016

Close in 2010.

Regardless of that, what does your OP have to do with the primaries? Nothing.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
13. We in California and most other liberal states don't get to vote until after the rednecks
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:43 PM
Mar 2016

in the South have their say.

I want Bernie supporters and others to keep that in mind.

You can't win presidential elections if you put weight on who people in Kansas and Idaho and states that have not voted for a Democratic president since 1964 want as the nominee. This is especially true for South Carolina, the state that started the Civil War and that was still flying the Confederate flag until recently.

Most of these early southern states are not really relevant to the Democratic candidate in November.

Should we campaign there? Do I support the 50-state strategy? Yes.

But let's don't choose our candidate based on how they vote in the primary because they are conservative states and will never support a real Democrat.

Feel the Bern!

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
10. And how does this apply to the Republican outcomes of states tonight?
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:23 PM
Mar 2016

This is the primaries, all the states get a say in picking their party candidate.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
14. Right. I misread my notes. I wrote the years down on a piece of paper and could not
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:44 PM
Mar 2016

read my handwriting.

I will change my post.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
17. Missouri was 1996
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 09:08 PM
Mar 2016

It broke a long streak of being a bell weather state in 2008. Or, arguably 2000 since it went for Bush.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Keep this information in ...