Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

reformist2

(9,841 posts)
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:27 PM Mar 2016

The lopsided numbers for Hillary in the South mean Bernie is ahead in the rest of the country.

Last edited Tue Mar 1, 2016, 10:21 PM - Edit history (1)

Some people are celebrating Hillary's huge wins in South Carolina, Alabama, and Georgia.

I say, not so fast. In fact, the numbers indicate it's not something to celebrate at all.

If Bernie is only 4 points behind Hillary nationwide*, but Hillary is ahead of Bernie by 50 points in the South, then the math shows that Bernie is actually 4 points *ahead* in the rest of the country outside the South. It's because too much of Hillary's support was concentrated in so few states. Anyway, interesting result going forward...

*Even I you believe Hillary is ahead by 8 nationwide, this still means she and Bernie are tied in the rest of the country.

54 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The lopsided numbers for Hillary in the South mean Bernie is ahead in the rest of the country. (Original Post) reformist2 Mar 2016 OP
She's +17 nationally. JaneyVee Mar 2016 #1
LOL, maybe three months ago! reformist2 Mar 2016 #4
The CNN poll was released yesterday. JaneyVee Mar 2016 #8
It's only one poll. At best, her lead is 8 points. reformist2 Mar 2016 #12
Hope you didn't strain yourself SCantiGOP Mar 2016 #16
It means the forum goes up in flames all over again Hortensis Mar 2016 #41
Uh huh. zappaman Mar 2016 #2
the points per state are different than the national points. yardwork Mar 2016 #3
Sounds logical wyldwolf Mar 2016 #5
LOL! This place cracks me up. nt onehandle Mar 2016 #6
You'll see. The road ahead for Clinton is very rocky, full of losses. reformist2 Mar 2016 #10
I got my popcorn nt firebrand80 Mar 2016 #18
That's interesting KingFlorez Mar 2016 #7
Somebody skipped Statistics 101. nt Codeine Mar 2016 #9
Do the math and disprove it. It's never good to have all one's eggs in Georgia and South Carolina. reformist2 Mar 2016 #11
It is your assertion, so the burden of proof is on you. emulatorloo Mar 2016 #15
I don't respond to trash-talkers. I may make a new OP discussing the math in detail, however. reformist2 Mar 2016 #36
That's not even remotely how this works. Godhumor Mar 2016 #13
I think someone borrowed Dubya's Fuzzy Calculator Tarc Mar 2016 #14
Sshhh SCantiGOP Mar 2016 #17
I've never heard of forcing reality to fit polling Godhumor Mar 2016 #19
Again, disprove it. If Hillary is overly strong in one region, it means she's weaker everywhere else reformist2 Mar 2016 #20
No... Really no Godhumor Mar 2016 #21
No offense, really, but you don't understand the numbers behind these analyses. reformist2 Mar 2016 #22
Please proceed, governor n/t Godhumor Mar 2016 #23
Godhumor, please SCantiGOP Mar 2016 #24
Oh shit ... The Statistical Analyst doesn't understand statistics ... LOL ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2016 #27
S/he understands them fine. You don't. anigbrowl Mar 2016 #26
Correction ... Sophomoric mistake. eom 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2016 #28
XD anigbrowl Mar 2016 #29
XD??? 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2016 #33
:-| :-j :-) :-D XD anigbrowl Mar 2016 #34
Ahhh ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2016 #38
Now now, there's a good chance I'm older than you... anigbrowl Mar 2016 #40
I was giving my teachers American History, from a Black Perspective, before ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2016 #42
Guess I'm just a young 'un then! anigbrowl Mar 2016 #43
I was a small assed kid, wise and educated, beyond my years. eom 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2016 #45
This may be of assistance ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2016 #25
You mean the "math".nt LexVegas Mar 2016 #30
That's...not really how math works, I'm afraid auntpurl Mar 2016 #31
Huh? That makes absolutely no sense. brush Mar 2016 #32
It does make sense. If national polls are even, and one candidate is winning half the country, then reformist2 Mar 2016 #39
No, that is absolutely how it doesn't work obamanut2012 Mar 2016 #47
Nope, that doesn't work. brush Mar 2016 #54
Okay Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2016 #35
We should be nice. Codeine Mar 2016 #37
She's a Reagan Democrat, strong in the South. ozone_man Mar 2016 #44
Did anyone tell Iowa and Nevada ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2016 #46
lolz obamanut2012 Mar 2016 #48
Massachusetts and Minnesota are now the South too! Number23 Mar 2016 #49
Come on ... They're virtual ties!!! 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2016 #50
#berniemath giftedgirl77 Mar 2016 #51
I agree Hillary is going to slide downhill faster than a greased lightening strike. nt Todays_Illusion Mar 2016 #52
Liberal CA has lots of delegates and they are likely to go for Sanders; Liberty Belle Mar 2016 #53

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
41. It means the forum goes up in flames all over again
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 10:03 PM
Mar 2016

Every few days and especially on March 15th. I don't want to suggest that I think I'm blessed St. Honesty myself, but how on earth do people live their life this way? I want to know the truth so I can understand my world. I even like to think I'm tough enough to handle whatever it is with some degree of dignity.

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
19. I've never heard of forcing reality to fit polling
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:51 PM
Mar 2016

It is just a really horrendous misunderstanding of how polling works.

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
21. No... Really no
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 08:57 PM
Mar 2016

Polling is based on samples and assumptions. Voting is based on actually, you know, voting. If Clinton outperforms it is indicative that the polling itself didn't capture the true measure of her support. You don't, and can't, take real results and try to fit it to polling; it doesn't work that way. At all.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
27. Oh shit ... The Statistical Analyst doesn't understand statistics ... LOL ...
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 09:31 PM
Mar 2016

I think I'm going to buy hundred lottery tickets ... it'll increase my chances of winning by 100%!!!!

Universe ... I love me some numbers!

 

anigbrowl

(13,889 posts)
26. S/he understands them fine. You don't.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 09:27 PM
Mar 2016

You're aggregating results from multiple states and comparing them with national polls as if they were sampling the same population (which is not the same as the general population). Elementary mistake.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
38. Ahhh ...
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 09:57 PM
Mar 2016

my millennial daughter (the designated internet translator) is back at college ... and she left without setting the clock on my VCR, again!!!!

 

anigbrowl

(13,889 posts)
40. Now now, there's a good chance I'm older than you...
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 09:58 PM
Mar 2016

I'm 45*, did I win? did I? Did I? Did I?

* in calendar years. Can't speak for the mental age...

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
42. I was giving my teachers American History, from a Black Perspective, before ...
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 10:05 PM
Mar 2016

you were a twinkling in your parents' eye.

reformist2

(9,841 posts)
39. It does make sense. If national polls are even, and one candidate is winning half the country, then
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 09:57 PM
Mar 2016

it can be inferred that the other candidate is winning in the other half.

Liberty Belle

(9,534 posts)
53. Liberal CA has lots of delegates and they are likely to go for Sanders;
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 11:31 PM
Mar 2016

Many of our delegates have remained uncommitted here too (superdelegates) knowing this.

Oregon, Washington, Hawaii are all potential wins for Sanders.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The lopsided numbers for ...