Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

book_worm

(15,951 posts)
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 10:19 AM Mar 2016

Super Tuesday: HRC: 3,534,937 (61%) Bernie: 2,264,297 (39%)

A big win in the popular vote for HRC taking 3.5 million votes to Bernie's 2.2 million and a 61-39 percent spread. Her best states were Alabama (78-19) and Georgia (71-28) again with overwhelming support among African-Americans.

The biggest prize was Texas which HRC won 65-33 and picked up 122 delegates to 48. Her coalition was diverse, as usual, winning African-Americans 80-18 and Latinos (who made up nearly 30% of the turnout) 67-33. She even narrowly won the white vote.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/03/01/us/elections/texas-democrat-poll.html?_r=0

There are still some votes yet to be counted. Bernie won overwhelmingly in his homestate and nice victories in CO, OK, & MN--however, in the caucus states of MN & CO turnout was relatively small. For instance, in Minnesota about 190,000 people turned out compared to the primary state of Georgia (relatively same size) where over 750,000 voted. In Colorado the turnout was about 125,000.

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Super Tuesday: HRC: 3,534,937 (61%) Bernie: 2,264,297 (39%) (Original Post) book_worm Mar 2016 OP
Wow Latinos were 30% of the turnout of the Democratic primary? auntpurl Mar 2016 #1
I believe you are correct! NurseJackie Mar 2016 #4
Wouldn't it be nice to get that boatload of EC votes directly in the blue column auntpurl Mar 2016 #5
Texas is changing ... fair redistricting in the future ... NurseJackie Mar 2016 #7
Reality! NurseJackie Mar 2016 #2
YUUUGE win. nt LexVegas Mar 2016 #3
Big numbers!! DCBob Mar 2016 #6
It's not gloating, it's math! grossproffit Mar 2016 #8
Math and facts. Hard things to argue!! Pisces Mar 2016 #9
K&R for Math! livetohike Mar 2016 #10
It's a way to pick a nominee DefenseLawyer Mar 2016 #11
How'd this sink to the bottom? grossproffit Mar 2016 #12

auntpurl

(4,311 posts)
1. Wow Latinos were 30% of the turnout of the Democratic primary?
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 10:22 AM
Mar 2016

I swear to you, in our lifetime we will see TX turn blue in a GE.

Of course, popular vote doesn't count in the primaries, but it's still nice to have the numbers. Thanks for posting.

auntpurl

(4,311 posts)
5. Wouldn't it be nice to get that boatload of EC votes directly in the blue column
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 10:27 AM
Mar 2016

and maybe not have to fight with Ohio so much anymore.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
7. Texas is changing ... fair redistricting in the future ...
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 10:30 AM
Mar 2016

... will make it more competitive. As you say, in our lifetimes!

 

DefenseLawyer

(11,101 posts)
11. It's a way to pick a nominee
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 11:02 AM
Mar 2016

But beyond that it doesn't mean a lot. Colorado and Virginia will be in play, those are a split. Mass and Vermont are in our column, so those votes for one or the other won't decide the general. All that support in the Deep South is nice, but those votes are literally meaningless in the general. We aren't going to win any of those states. Good wins in the primary, yes. But those raw numbers don't stand for much of anything.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Super Tuesday: HRC: 3,534...