Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,805 posts)
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 01:47 PM Mar 2016

Winning Democrat nomination needs voter coalition: Clinton campaign

Source: Reuters

Politics | Wed Mar 2, 2016 11:33am EST

Winning Democrat nomination needs voter coalition: Clinton campaign

NEW YORK

The campaign of Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton on Wednesday called support from a broad coalition of voters - including people of color, women and union households - "critical" for anyone hoping to secure the party's nomination for the November 2016 election and beyond.

Robby Mook, Clinton's campaign manager, noted support for the former secretary of state among African Americans, Latinos and Asian American Pacific Islanders, women and union households in a memo sent out by the campaign.

He also noted that Clinton won white voters in the nominating contests for several states on Super Tuesday, the previous day, in which Clinton won seven states to the four states captured by her rival, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders.

"It is also important to note that these constituencies are not only critical to winning the Democratic nomination but will also be central to how a Democrat wins in November, and a candidate that starts with a deep base of support will have an advantage in the general election," Mook wrote.

(Reporting by Luciana Lopez)


http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-memo-idUSKCN0W423Y
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Winning Democrat nomination needs voter coalition: Clinton campaign (Original Post) Eugene Mar 2016 OP
And maybe The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2016 #1
Or maybe spare the millennials a thought. Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #8
I don't think there is anything she could possibly do to Svafa Mar 2016 #16
She really is running the last 20th century campaign. Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #19
She has the millennial vote...just not the white ones. JaneyVee Mar 2016 #20
None of the African American millennials I know trust her at all. nt Svafa Mar 2016 #21
They should have thought of that before burning their bridge. HooptieWagon Mar 2016 #2
They don't need us. We're just a small group of tea party lefties according to Bill. n/t PonyUp Mar 2016 #3
Why SCantiGOP Mar 2016 #4
Because the OP was basically an anti-Sanders screed from the Clinton campaign Armstead Mar 2016 #7
Is your definition SCantiGOP Mar 2016 #11
Both are implicit criticisms of the otehr candidate and a call to vote for "mine" instead Armstead Mar 2016 #12
Basically agree SCantiGOP Mar 2016 #13
A pro-Clinton OP implicitly critical of Sanders....Better? Armstead Mar 2016 #14
At least this thread is actually in GDP and is about the Dem nomination. tanyev Mar 2016 #17
By definition, any campaign that wins the nomination will have had a coalition. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2016 #5
They just don't want those non-Democratic Bernie supporters. madfloridian Mar 2016 #6
Dream on Politicalboi Mar 2016 #9
I am quite sure SCantiGOP Mar 2016 #18
I vote for whomever shares my goals and values. Shadowflash Mar 2016 #10
Maybe DWS's vote will help you? ConsiderThis_2016 Mar 2016 #15

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,576 posts)
1. And maybe
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 01:49 PM
Mar 2016

the Clinton campaign might want to stop treating progressives with condescension and derision? They're gonna need us, too.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
8. Or maybe spare the millennials a thought.
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 02:03 PM
Mar 2016

You know, other then: "you kids need to shut up and do as mommy says. We have got ours and we don't care whether you get yours"?

SCantiGOP

(13,862 posts)
4. Why
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 01:53 PM
Mar 2016

Do so many people here hijack every thread and turn it into an anti-Clinton forum. Can you not occasionally read the thread and comment on it without the vitriol?

SCantiGOP

(13,862 posts)
11. Is your definition
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 02:11 PM
Mar 2016

that anti-Sanders is the same thing as pro-Clinton? Because I don't see any attack or disparaging comments in the OP about Sanders.

tanyev

(42,514 posts)
17. At least this thread is actually in GDP and is about the Dem nomination.
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 03:02 PM
Mar 2016

I'm amazed at all the threads on totally unrelated topics that get hijacked.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
5. By definition, any campaign that wins the nomination will have had a coalition.
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 01:58 PM
Mar 2016

Just not necessarily the same one as their opponent(s).

 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
9. Dream on
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 02:04 PM
Mar 2016

I will vote for Bernie or Jill Stein. I will NEVER support her in any way shape or form. Cheaters and liars don't get my respect. They just get my hatred.

SCantiGOP

(13,862 posts)
18. I am quite sure
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 03:35 PM
Mar 2016

that the eventual GOP nominee would be thrilled to hear this sentiment.

I will not hesitate to enthusiastically support the Democratic candidate, because the alternative is too dire to even consider.

Shadowflash

(1,536 posts)
10. I vote for whomever shares my goals and values.
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 02:11 PM
Mar 2016

In the primaries, it's been Sanders.

It may, or may not, be HRC in the general (if she even gets there). We'll see what all the candidates positions are on the issues I care about. The only thing I can guarantee is that it won't be GOP.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Winning Democrat nominati...