Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 03:45 PM Mar 2016

Anecdotal evidence: stupor Wednesday edition

At work we have two groups of republicans, the ranged and the deranged. The latter were quite clear that they will be voting against Clinton, who apparently belongs in jail because <words>.

The ranged are just dismayed by Trump and may or may not vote and it isn't clear at all that they won't just fall in line and vote for Trump. They do not seem to think voting for Clinton is a possibility.

Not one person across the political spectrum voiced any enthusiasm for Clinton at all.

So the point, and it is only anecdotal, is that Trump v Clinton is not a sure bet for a Clinton victory.

Clinton's non-anecdotal negatives are yuuuuge. She will get out the vote, drive turnout, but not for Democrats. We are likely in the process of selecting the best candidate to lose to Trump.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Anecdotal evidence: stupor Wednesday edition (Original Post) Warren Stupidity Mar 2016 OP
It does look that way RobertEarl Mar 2016 #1
'If we are going to nominate someone who 50% of our people can't stand, elleng Mar 2016 #2
My favorite stat was from Hillary's "win" in Massachusetts virtualobserver Mar 2016 #5
Right. elleng Mar 2016 #6
There are quite a few prominent repugs that have said they'd vote for Clinton . . . brush Mar 2016 #3
He has no support with Hispanics or African Americans. sufrommich Mar 2016 #4
No I think there are sure r votes sure d votes Warren Stupidity Mar 2016 #7

elleng

(130,864 posts)
2. 'If we are going to nominate someone who 50% of our people can't stand,
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 03:58 PM
Mar 2016

we are going to lose.'

Marco Rubio

Goes for BOTH parties.

 

virtualobserver

(8,760 posts)
5. My favorite stat was from Hillary's "win" in Massachusetts
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 04:12 PM
Mar 2016

80% said that Bernie was trustworthy, and 53% thought that Hillary was.

Only 53% ?

Imagine what Republicans think of her.

brush

(53,764 posts)
3. There are quite a few prominent repugs that have said they'd vote for Clinton . . .
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 03:59 PM
Mar 2016

if Trumps wins the nomination.

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
4. He has no support with Hispanics or African Americans.
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 04:02 PM
Mar 2016

When I see this claim being made I wonder if the person making the claim thinks only white people vote. There are very specific percentages of minority votes one absolutely has to get to become president,Trump doesn't have them and doesn't have a prayer of getting them.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
7. No I think there are sure r votes sure d votes
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 04:45 PM
Mar 2016

and a large block of undecided independent swing votes.

Non-white voters are overwhelmingly in the d camp. The election will be decided, as always by that other group, the undecided independent voter, and by the turnout of all of those groups.

Clinton is not driving turnout in the d base.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Anecdotal evidence: stupo...