Jonathan Capehart shilling for Hillary on MSNBC again.

[grasswire]

Why aren't networks required to acknowledge the conflicts of interest against pundits?

And why is Capehart still allowed near a mic?

[benny05]

1. It was a weird segment period

I don't know why Tad Devine would agree to be on the show unless they didn't tell him that there were other pundits on the show shilling for HC. It was just strange.

[emulatorloo]

2. Tad's been on that show for years. First saw him on in 2004

So he knows how it works and he always does well in those group situations IMHO. Devine is a real pro.

Not sure what show's on now but Tweety has had him on a lot over the years. Very often the set up was tweety, Devine, and a Republican strategist discussing politics and elections.

[benny05]

4. It's weird

Because Tad is representing Bernie directly. He should have been given the courtesy to appear alone without other pundits. He's not appearing in the capacity as a pundit.

[emulatorloo]

8. Ok Got your point. Does sound weird

[peacebird]

3. Because the M$M is owned by the 1%, and Bernie scares the crap out of them

[grasswire]

6. but you know the Republicans would hector a pundit out of the business.

Why is it that OUR people are the ones kicked off the peoples' airwaves ---- and for speaking truth. And their people can lie and shill and ............

I'm getting pretty peeved.

[peacebird]

7. #ClintonSoCorrupt

[revbones]

5. Aligned interests. n/t

[Jenny_92808]

9. So true

and your signature line makes a good point.