2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumGrand Prize of the weekend goes to Hillary
Splitting delegates is not enough for Bernie.
MATH!
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)basselope
(2,565 posts)And with NY and CA on the horizon and Bernie ahead in both.. Clinton's tiny lead ain't gonna hold up.
Skid Rogue
(711 posts)Link please.
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)Skid Rogue
(711 posts)Number23
(24,544 posts)the answer is and apparently always will be... absolutely nothing.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511412747#post16
Some people apparently believe that if they just keep tying "Sanders is ahead in NY and CA" that automatically turns it into gospel.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Basically, Bernie is seriously behind and has to catch up. Last I heard he needed to take an average about 62% of the remaining states delegates to get the magic number of delegates at the end. Each time he "won" a state with less than that, the average needed to catch up rose for the remaining states.
After yesterday, that 62% average number of delegates Bernie must win in the remaining states has now risen, to what I haven't heard yet, but he lost further ground.
basselope
(2,565 posts)Bernie is ahead in NY and CA.
Skid Rogue
(711 posts)I believe you if you say those numbers are out there. I'd like to study them, too. Link please.
basselope
(2,565 posts)I didn't save the links, but it contained polls from most of the remaining states.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)This happens a lot here.
If you can't find them, then why should the people you are trying to convince go out and try to find them?
P.S. I would like to see them too.
basselope
(2,565 posts)NY was +1 and CA was +2 or 3
I just read it and found it interesting.
LonePirate
(13,417 posts)basselope
(2,565 posts)LonePirate
(13,417 posts)basselope
(2,565 posts)They take some.. ignore others.
Skid Rogue
(711 posts)But if you fine fellows are selling these polls, you need to be able to link to them. You wouldn't want people to think you're not being honest.
Sancho
(9,067 posts)Field 12/16 - 1/3 329 LV 5.6 46 35 1 Clinton +11
LA Times/USC 8/29 - 9/8 819 RV 3.6 39 23 1 Clinton +16
Sancho
(9,067 posts)Siena 1/31 - 2/3 434 RV 5.6 55 34 Clinton +21
Quinnipiac 5/28 - 6/1 508 RV 4.4 55 15 Clinton +40
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)AA and Hispanics will be going heavy for Clinton.
basselope
(2,565 posts)California is an easy win for Bernie by 10 or more points.
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)Hillary will win Hispanics by 40 percent.
basselope
(2,565 posts)itsrobert
(14,157 posts)Hillary won Texas with 70 percent of the hispanic vote.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/adriancarrasquillo/texas-colorado-latino-clinton-sanders#.pgXoKEWAW6
In Nevada, despite the small sample size exit poll, the analysis vetted out Clinton won in hispanic communities by large margins.
Number23
(24,544 posts)Sanders has not won one state with a significant minority population.
Among states that don't have significant minority populations, Sanders has still lost the minority vote in all of them.
basselope
(2,565 posts)Bernie won hispanic vote in both Nevada and Colorado.
He wins CA in a walkaway.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)California's kind of a thing-unto-itself. Not much like the other West Coast states. Not much like the other Southwest states, either. The far northern part (call it Chico on up?) is really part of my region, Cascadia. Beyond that, it's almost like a different country.
basselope
(2,565 posts)But as far as the Hispanic vote goes, I expect them to be much closer to how Nevada and Colorado voted than Texas.
Sancho
(9,067 posts)and also winning the Latino polls.
Chances are the primary will be mathematically over before California, but Hillary is ahead in the available polls now.
Sancho
(9,067 posts)basselope
(2,565 posts)Sancho
(9,067 posts)Here in Florida, most of us have voted by mail.
Nothing has changed from the best survey by the hispanics of their own constituents.
It's simply not true that Bernie is winning with hispanics. Hillary is easily winning with hispanics and minority.
basselope
(2,565 posts)http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/02/23/why-bernie-sanders-really-did-win-nevadas-hispanic-vote/
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/texas-latinos-back-clinton-sanders-takes-hispanic-counties-colorado-n530371
You will find CA much more in line with Nevada and Colorado over TX. TX is a world unto itself.
Sancho
(9,067 posts)Your link...when there is actual polling of hispanics, Hillary wins...
"Exit polling of a slice of Latinos who voted showed Clinton won 70 percent of those Latinos, and 28 percent voted for Sanders."
You do understand that the actual poll from Colorado was one that I sent you.
Also, there are more people in my county here in Fl than in the state of Colorado...
CA won't matter - it will be over by then. Regardless, it will go to Hillary, and hispanics will be heavily in favor of Hillary.
He won the Laitno vote in BOTH Nevada and Colorado, as the links show.
He is also winning it in other states as well. Texas was an anomaly.
CA will matter.
But, you're a Clintonite, so you are for President Trump.
Sancho
(9,067 posts)Bernie will not win the Primary. He certainly cannot win a GE.
basselope
(2,565 posts)Lord knows Clinton doesn't have a chance.
With Kasich as his VP and the youth not turning out.. how on earth does she plan to win???
Obama NEEDED the young vote to win.
She won't get it.
Sancho
(9,067 posts)Kasich won't be a VP, and Trump won't be President.
The young never vote in large numbers.
One possible VP for Hillary is Castro.
BTW:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/22/upshot/why-clinton-not-sanders-probably-won-the-hispanic-vote-in-nevada.html?_r=0
basselope
(2,565 posts)The NYT article was completely debunked by the very link I gave you.
The YOUNG were the reason Obama won in 2008 http://www.usnews.com/news/campaign-2008/articles/2008/11/06/young-voters-powered-obamas-victory-while-shrugging-off-slacker-image
They ain't showing up for Clinton.
She loses to the Trump/Kasich ticket.
So, to all the Clintonites... we have you to thank for President Trump.
Sancho
(9,067 posts)And on top of that, it's much harder to register or present ID now than in 2008.
basselope
(2,565 posts)And voter ID laws impact the elderly MUCH MORE than the Youth.
Voter turnout was 54.5% in 2008
AND
They made up a larger % of the voters than those older voters in 2008.
"They made up a higher proportion of the electorate18 percentthan the 65-and-older age category, which accounted for 16 percent."
Please read facts b4 posting in the future.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)angstlessk
(11,862 posts)Link: https://www.isidewith.com/2016-democratic-primary-poll/801555698/9333319
With a total of 25 delegates
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Codeine
(25,586 posts)Linky?
basselope
(2,565 posts)Codeine
(25,586 posts)basselope
(2,565 posts)It had a list of all the remaining states and polls. Bernie was up by 1 in new and 2 or 3 in CA.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)posted all over the board. I'm doubtful.
Bernie well and truly behind in NY. Your post is full of it.
reformist2
(9,841 posts)Gwhittey
(1,377 posts)trap. IF look at every news site she is at like 1,066 vs Sanders 432. They are not getting clue that SD are what is making that lead. If it comes down to that she will win the Nom, but lose the GE in a landslide.
artislife
(9,497 posts)We are not giving up. All the way to convention. The country needs to see that this is no walk in the park. People in states that may actually vote blue are going mostly Bernie's way.
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)jfern
(5,204 posts)Cobalt Violet
(9,905 posts)but maybe if you keep telling yourself that you might convince yourself.
longship
(40,416 posts)Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)We have people in serious denial here. They are a bit on edge.