'Superdelegates" are a scourge on democracy.

[libtodeath]

We as a party should be disgusted by their existence.

[Agnosticsherbet]

1. How dare Ted Devine scourge democracy. Whoever he works for should have something to say about that.

[wyldwolf]

9. Absolutely! No real progressive would hire that clown to work for him!

[MrMickeysMom]

2. I know I am...

I think I said something about this using Howard Dean as a good example yesterday...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1422343

Why the hell have we gone from one person = one vote to THIS shit? This is all part of that TURD WAY DLC apparatus brought about by none other than Bill Clinton.

[orpupilofnature57]

4. + 1000000000000 !!!!!!!!!!!

[wyldwolf]

11. AMAZING how reality disagrees with you.

[orpupilofnature57]

3. They're Lobbyists and nothing more, all wanting a feather for their nest, from our Democracy .

[hack89]

10. The vast majority are elected Dem office holders.

can you at least get your facts right?

[Codeine]

5. They're meaningless.

They're not going to go against the pledged delegate winner in this day and age. All this hysteria over nothing. . .

[SusanCalvin]

6. I certainly hope so,

but I'm tired of seeing them included in the delegate count now.

[Dragonfli]

8. Dr Dean would beg to differ, he said he will definitely go against the pledged delegate winner

So you appear to be mistaken.

[Codeine]

13. There's one.

The very end of democracy itself.

And honestly, it's not going to matter. Sanders has lost this thing already. She's going to win walking away; superdelegates won't matter one iota.

[DCBob]

7. They wont have any impact this year.

Hillary will win easily without them.

[lovuian]

12. It doesn't look democratic

and if Hillary wins by Superdelegates and not voter turnout

it would be a dreadful disaster for the Democratic Party

I do think there will be a protest and a petition to remove them