Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I won't begrudge Bernie Sanders his win in he Maine Caucus... (Original Post) brooklynite Mar 2016 OP
That's so very big of you. Broward Mar 2016 #1
this is yuge Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #13
Why thank you--I've been waiting all night for your approval CoffeeCat Mar 2016 #2
Just a note that, by comparison, there's been an excuse for every State he didn't win... brooklynite Mar 2016 #22
Are you petioning for sainthood? angstlessk Mar 2016 #3
Only 3,000 people voted in the whole state? Agschmid Mar 2016 #4
There were over 3,000 DELEGATES chosen... k8conant Mar 2016 #5
thank you nt renate Mar 2016 #6
If he would read the front page of the Huff Post artislife Mar 2016 #17
WRONG, WRONG -- JUST THE OPPOSITE. Armstead Mar 2016 #7
I think you need a refresher in caucuses. Barack_America Mar 2016 #8
Uh... wilsonbooks Mar 2016 #9
You're only off by more than a factor of 10. jeff47 Mar 2016 #10
Research then self delete if you have any self respect! Nt Logical Mar 2016 #11
Oh, thank you so much. TheCowsCameHome Mar 2016 #12
Voters don't vote in a caucus HassleCat Mar 2016 #14
Disingenous TSIAS Mar 2016 #15
k&r noamnety Mar 2016 #16
.. cherokeeprogressive Mar 2016 #18
The OP has gone AWOL. LOL reformist2 Mar 2016 #29
How many of them were non-white? oberliner Mar 2016 #19
. JonLeibowitz Mar 2016 #20
The OP is embarrassingly wrong.... actually thought only 3,000 people voted!? reformist2 Mar 2016 #21
Again, a Clinton supporter fails on basic facts. Motown_Johnny Mar 2016 #23
That's because they are "low information voters". John Poet Mar 2016 #27
Teehee, uhm no. Try something like closer to 50,000 eom Arazi Mar 2016 #24
LMAO....KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK OP! Joe the Revelator Mar 2016 #25
Please Self Delete CdnExtraNational Mar 2016 #26
I would rather they turn the threadline red and mark it as FALSE. reformist2 Mar 2016 #28
It was delegates. I know there were precincts with several hundred voters jfern Mar 2016 #30

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
2. Why thank you--I've been waiting all night for your approval
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 11:40 PM
Mar 2016

Great to hear that you don't "begrudge Bernie Sanders his win."

We can all collectively celebrate now.

Rock on, party people!





angstlessk

(11,862 posts)
3. Are you petioning for sainthood?
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 11:42 PM
Mar 2016

WOW how very kind of you...

hey dixieland..your new voting restrictions will make your vote in the primaries void!

k8conant

(3,030 posts)
5. There were over 3,000 DELEGATES chosen...
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 11:45 PM
Mar 2016

This was a caucus.

https://bangordailynews.com/story/live-maine-democrats-vote-in-presidential-caucuses/?ref=topStories3Thumb

Maine Democrats vote in presidential caucuses
Good night and good luck
A full story on the Maine Democratic Party caucuses is now posted on our website. Party leaders say 46,000 people participated, which is a record. Sen. Bernie Sanders is the projected winner. We will continue to update that story with new results. Watch for a delegate breakdown in the near future. If you are not already subscribed to Daily Brief, sign up at The Point to receive emailed morning reports on what matters in Maine politics Monday through Friday. Thank you.

9:00 pm
Mar 6, 2016
Robert Long

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
17. If he would read the front page of the Huff Post
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 12:09 AM
Mar 2016

He would see this:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/

The Maine Democratic Party doesn't report vote counts. It reports State Convention Delegates (SCDs)


This pains me, because this is chipping away at his "expert in all things Democratic" in my eyes...
 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
7. WRONG, WRONG -- JUST THE OPPOSITE.
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 11:48 PM
Mar 2016
https://bangordailynews.com/2016/03/06/politics/bernie-sanders-handily-defeats-hillary-clinton-in-maine-caucuses/

The state delegates Sanders won in Sunday’s caucuses will translate into delegates to the National Democratic Convention in July. Twenty-five delegates were up for grabs at the caucuses. They will be allocated proportionally based on turnout in the 1st and 2nd congressional districts and the state as a whole.

Party leaders said more than 47,000 people participated in the caucuses.

Volunteers from many of the roughly 500 caucus sites in Maine reported heavy turnouts, in some areas rivaling the flood of Democrats who turned out in 2008, Barack Obama’s first shot at the presidency.

The line of people waiting to get into the Portland caucus at Deering High School stretched more than half a mile. Some people reported waiting more than three hours before being able to register and vote in that caucus.



In Brunswick and several other locations, most of Sunday’s planned program of speeches by local candidates and consideration of party bylaws was canceled because of the heavy turnout. In Brunswick, there were still hundreds of people waiting in line as the scheduled caucus starting time came and went.

“It’s amazing,” said Brunswick caucus chairwoman Trish Reilly. “There were people already waiting here at noon,” two hours before the caucus was scheduled to start.

wilsonbooks

(972 posts)
9. Uh...
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 11:50 PM
Mar 2016

3,000 total votes?

UPDATE 8:35 p.m. EST — According to vote-tracker Decision Desk, with 85 percent of the votes tallied, more than 46,000 people turned out to take part in the Maine Democratic caucus, which multiple outlets have projected as a landslide win for Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders over former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. A local reporter in Portland, Maine, tweeted before the results came in that the previous turnout record was 45,000 in 2008.

TheCowsCameHome

(40,168 posts)
12. Oh, thank you so much.
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 11:54 PM
Mar 2016

Such generosity overwhelms the struggling masses beneath your feet.

Psssst -The HRC group is snickering at you.

TSIAS

(14,689 posts)
15. Disingenous
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 12:02 AM
Mar 2016

As with the Iowa caucuses, that does not reflect the raw vote totals.

Sure, Maine doesn't have that many voters, but it does appear more than 40,000 voters showed up. I don't think you should dismiss their efforts.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
19. How many of them were non-white?
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 12:21 AM
Mar 2016

Bernie seems to do very well in states that are predominately white.

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
20. .
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 12:54 AM
Mar 2016

"3,000 total votes"

And to people take posts seriously due to your "mega donor" cachet.

What a joke. Please do not self-delete. I am kicking and reccing this to the front page for embarrassment.




.



.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
23. Again, a Clinton supporter fails on basic facts.
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 12:58 AM
Mar 2016

Those are state delegates. Not votes.


http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/maine


^snip^


3,470 votes, 91% reporting (540 of 593 precincts)

Winner called by A.P.

*Vote totals are state convention delegates won.




No wonder you support Hillary.




 

CdnExtraNational

(105 posts)
26. Please Self Delete
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 01:18 AM
Mar 2016

I hope its just an embarrassing mistake confusing delegates with votes.

Shouldn't moderators delete stuff that's just obviously incorrect?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I won't begrudge Bernie S...