Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BernieforPres2016

(3,017 posts)
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 02:24 AM Mar 2016

Another new one for Hillary tonight, or at least new to me: "Clawbacks"

Tonight she said she would go after companies like Johnson Controls who had received government assistance or subsidies then moved overseas and claw back the benefits they had received.

1. Is this a new position for her or have I just missed it?
2. Is there anything in U.S. law that supports this if those provisions weren't written as strings attached to the prior government assistance?

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Another new one for Hillary tonight, or at least new to me: "Clawbacks" (Original Post) BernieforPres2016 Mar 2016 OP
Depends metroins Mar 2016 #1

metroins

(2,550 posts)
1. Depends
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 02:27 AM
Mar 2016

If the subsidies were tied to metrics that were quantifiable, then the government has rights to enforce those metrics or nullify the subsidies.

It depends on the contact terms and the metrics involved.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Another new one for Hilla...