Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eridani

(51,907 posts)
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 06:24 AM Mar 2016

Now, 17-Year-Olds In Ohio Won’t Be Allowed to Vote In This Month’s Primary

http://www.nationofchange.org/news/2016/03/06/now-17-year-olds-in-ohio-wont-be-allowed-to-vote-in-this-months-primary/

In Ohio, as in 21 other states and the District of Columbia, if you will turn 18 years old by the time of the general election, you are permitted to participate in your state’s caucus or primary.

Yet the Buckeye State reversed course and 17-year-olds will no longer be able to vote in the state’s presidential primary on March 15.

Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted’s directive, in the 2015 election manual, states that these young voters cannot vote because the presidential primary election being held on March 15 will elect delegates, who then go to the conventions of their parties to vote on a nominee. The difference, the Republican Secretary of State says, is between “electing” and “nominating.”

Seventeen-year-olds may nominate a candidate for office, but not elect an official. So it rests on whether a vote in the primary is categorized as an election or a nomination.

In 2008, Husted’s predecessor Jennifer Brunner confirmed that 17-year-olds could just nominate candidates, but did not say how presidential primaries were categorized. Still, the young voters were able to participate in the state’s 2008 primary, which became a battleground between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Now, 17-Year-Olds In Ohio Won’t Be Allowed to Vote In This Month’s Primary (Original Post) eridani Mar 2016 OP
No end to the bullshit. None. merrily Mar 2016 #1
Damn Peculiar chwaliszewski Mar 2016 #2
what does the dnc have to do with this ? JI7 Mar 2016 #3
Nothing. Agschmid Mar 2016 #7
I doubt Husted is in the tank for the DNC rbrnmw Mar 2016 #5
Way to disenfranchise on a technicality. Vattel Mar 2016 #4
Why no outrage on the other 28? MichMan Mar 2016 #6
I kind of agree Travis_0004 Mar 2016 #8
Bullshit. WA rules clearly state that you can vote in the caucuses if you will be 18 eridani Mar 2016 #11
Why BS??????? MichMan Mar 2016 #12
Low turnout always favours Repubs, young people are energized by Bernie. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2016 #9
The old establishment politicians are afraid of the young voters. They know they will liberal_at_heart Mar 2016 #10

MichMan

(11,910 posts)
6. Why no outrage on the other 28?
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 08:08 AM
Mar 2016

Only 21 states allow this; since this is far less than half, they are clearly in the minority

Where is the outrage on the others?

Here is list of those that allow it; mix of red and blue

Alaska, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, and Wyoming

eridani

(51,907 posts)
11. Bullshit. WA rules clearly state that you can vote in the caucuses if you will be 18
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 05:11 AM
Mar 2016

--by election day.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
9. Low turnout always favours Repubs, young people are energized by Bernie.
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 09:12 AM
Mar 2016

So even if it's in a primary, Husted wants to tamp down that enthusiasm so that hopefully fewer young people will vote in November.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
10. The old establishment politicians are afraid of the young voters. They know they will
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 10:46 AM
Mar 2016

hold them accountable unlike the older voters.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Now, 17-Year-Olds In Ohio...