Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 09:29 AM Mar 2016

Nancy Reagan Grave Dancing? She was ONLY First Lady - not POWERFUL.

Or influential. I mean, she wasn't even a Senator or Secretary of State. She was just married to this guy with an important job, while she baked cookies and decorated and stuff.

Why do they keep talking about how powerful she was and how much influence she had?



Part 2 of my ongoing reality series: "Don't put the Clintons (plural) BACK in the White House"

31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nancy Reagan Grave Dancing? She was ONLY First Lady - not POWERFUL. (Original Post) IdaBriggs Mar 2016 OP
Just Say No to grave-dancing. NurseJackie Mar 2016 #1
Generally agreed (but Junior and Cheney will elicit a jig in my home). IdaBriggs Mar 2016 #3
Agreed! NWCorona Mar 2016 #31
I had/have nothing major against Nancy Reagan.. vi5 Mar 2016 #2
I do. The way they handled the AIDS crisis is one of the most shameful periods in US history PeaceNikki Mar 2016 #26
Good points..... vi5 Mar 2016 #29
She put enormous pressure on legislatures to adopt the anti drug randr Mar 2016 #4
Are you saying the First Lady is influential and has power in Washington? IdaBriggs Mar 2016 #8
Only the good parts UglyGreed Mar 2016 #10
Not sure what evoked the snarkasm randr Mar 2016 #11
Sunday thread I posted yesterday.... IdaBriggs Mar 2016 #13
I understand your concern randr Mar 2016 #15
Plus the new animosity from the left, now that we know she's a purchased war hawk corporate RiverLover Mar 2016 #18
Yep. She also sat on her ass while the HIV/AIDS epidemic raged. backscatter712 Mar 2016 #14
She was party to concealing how sick her husband was for years. peace13 Mar 2016 #5
At a certain level, how can you separate the two? nt IdaBriggs Mar 2016 #9
The Presidential gig was the final acting job for 2 grade B actors. gordianot Mar 2016 #6
Adultery & Pre-Marital Pregnancy becoming a ultra moral crusader, influencing RR's religiosity. TheBlackAdder Mar 2016 #7
Last night tweety actually said that Nancy's astrologer was "at least randr Mar 2016 #12
She did Ron's astrological charts. RiverLover Mar 2016 #16
Love your message. Yell it from the rooftops. NCTraveler Mar 2016 #17
Sigh. Believe it or not, Bernie is not my only concern. IdaBriggs Mar 2016 #19
Sigh NCTraveler Mar 2016 #21
Does that mean we are good, even if we disagree about this? IdaBriggs Mar 2016 #22
I found part two to be awe inspiring!!!!! Borderline brilliant. nt. NCTraveler Mar 2016 #23
Now you are teasing! Lol! IdaBriggs Mar 2016 #24
She was co-President with Ronnie. Truth! nt Jitter65 Mar 2016 #20
Very good. H2O Man Mar 2016 #25
Nancy Reagan was very powerful as First Lady. kstewart33 Mar 2016 #27
I can't honestly say how powerful/influential Hillary Clinton was as FLOTUS but I can say this tularetom Mar 2016 #28
Really good point. I was one of those who was initially skeptical Arazi Mar 2016 #30
 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
3. Generally agreed (but Junior and Cheney will elicit a jig in my home).
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 09:37 AM
Mar 2016

I am trying to make a point that she held one of the most powerful and influential roles in our country for eight years as did Hillary Clinton, but it may be too subtle (ha!) for a morning without caffeine.

 

vi5

(13,305 posts)
2. I had/have nothing major against Nancy Reagan..
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 09:36 AM
Mar 2016

I think her "Just Say No" initiative was naive but well intentioned and she seemed like a nice enough lady who loved her husband very much and raised a good son in Ron Reagan Jr.

I wouldn't call myself a fan but nothing she did would rise (or sink) to the level of me hating her enough to be happy she's gone. And I was someone who did a happy jig when Scalia died.

 

vi5

(13,305 posts)
29. Good points.....
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 03:05 PM
Mar 2016

I'm not nominating her for sainthood by any stretch of the imagination. But ultimately her death doesn't impact most of us at this point since it's been a long time since she actively had any power. Unlike Scalia who died while still trying to and having the power to deny people their basic human rights and liberties. His dying provides a chance for people to have better lives. To my knowledge at this point Nancy's death affects nobody but her immediate family.

Still, to your point it is important to remember things like you posted.

randr

(12,409 posts)
4. She put enormous pressure on legislatures to adopt the anti drug
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 09:38 AM
Mar 2016

policies of her husband. She is responsible for the destruction of many lives and families.

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
8. Are you saying the First Lady is influential and has power in Washington?
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 11:29 AM
Mar 2016

But not Hillary Clinton, right? And if Bill is there, he wouldn't be anything but a happy doddering old grandpa, right?

Right?



Apologies for the heavy sarcasm, but this is kind of a big deal. Sigh.

randr

(12,409 posts)
11. Not sure what evoked the snarkasm
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 12:02 PM
Mar 2016

Nancy had tremendous influence in Washington. She was often the reason both side came together on important issues.
The influence I inferred was for her 'just say no campaign' which gathered enough support across the Nation that it became it's own meme.
I was supportive of Hillary's work on the health care issue. I think something might have been done at the time had there not been so much animosity toward her. I fear the same animosity will hinder her if she is selected as our candidate.

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
13. Sunday thread I posted yesterday....
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 12:24 PM
Mar 2016

I am beyond concerned about the cronyism and corruption inherent in spouses trading off the duties of the White House. Multiple posters voiced a complete lack of belief that "First Lady Hillary Clinton" was actually either powerful or influential during her husband's time in office.

The link is here - http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511424373 and I was attempting to use Nancy Reagan as an example of the power inherent in the address.

Sigh.

randr

(12,409 posts)
15. I understand your concern
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 12:39 PM
Mar 2016

As the role of First Lady has evolved the position, and it is a position, has become more that just 'interior decorator'.
Since the Kennedy era First Lady's have championed issues such as alcohol addiction, education, health care, and literacy.
Their roles have improved our lives, mostly.

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
18. Plus the new animosity from the left, now that we know she's a purchased war hawk corporate
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 12:46 PM
Mar 2016

disingenuous candidate for the uber wealthy.





backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
14. Yep. She also sat on her ass while the HIV/AIDS epidemic raged.
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 12:25 PM
Mar 2016

Rock Hudson asked for her help, and she refused.

 

peace13

(11,076 posts)
5. She was party to concealing how sick her husband was for years.
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 09:45 AM
Mar 2016

She would parade him around like nothing was wrong. Was she powerful or master of deceit?

gordianot

(15,233 posts)
6. The Presidential gig was the final acting job for 2 grade B actors.
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 10:09 AM
Mar 2016

Nancy was able and trusted to feed lines when Ronnie forgot or went off script. I always wondered how much of his own crap he believed unlike the current sociopaths who believe what they say.

TheBlackAdder

(28,167 posts)
7. Adultery & Pre-Marital Pregnancy becoming a ultra moral crusader, influencing RR's religiosity.
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 10:11 AM
Mar 2016

.


Let's not forget that the 8 year presidency was guided by astrology sessions.


At least there weren't any seances.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/11/07/obama-apologizes-to-nancy_n_142280.html


.

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
19. Sigh. Believe it or not, Bernie is not my only concern.
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 02:25 PM
Mar 2016

I may just not be cut out for this (not making an inappropriate innuendo) sausage festival because I really don't like thinking about "how it gets made". The politics of power are terrifying. The corruption and deal making that takes place - sigh.

I *know* I am not the only one with this corruption concern. It has become an article of faith amongst the Republicans, and is accepted as "business as usual" among large contingents of our own party. I said this deep in the other thread - what are the odds an entire generation of ambitious politicians all simultaneously decided that honestly, a two time Senator and a retired Secretary of State was the "most qualified" person to be President? Why was the ONLY INDEPENDENT with no ties to the DNC the only person (other than "pick me for the VP spot to demonstrate party unity" guy) willing to throw his hat into the ring? I think the fact Bernie ISN'T beholden to the DNC and wasn't taken seriously has kept him going - and I am convinced he wouldn't have been in if he hadn't known what was going on in the halls of power at a level to which we mere citizens are not privy.

Connections: money and power, favors given and received, threats subtle and not in regards to support for future careers - I really don't want to know how the sausage is made, but I know regularly scrubbing the bowl is a good thing.

I am not a politician, and I am not stupid. Neither are the majority of the voters. Bernie's VP pick is going to be crucial; my gut is that person (if Bernie is elected) will fill the office of President before his term is over.

Sigh.

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
22. Does that mean we are good, even if we disagree about this?
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 02:31 PM
Mar 2016

I hate having my favorite tomato guy annoyed with me.

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
24. Now you are teasing! Lol!
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 02:43 PM
Mar 2016

So, show me we are good (even if you disagree with my concerns) and tell me how many different heirloom varieties you have ready to go this year.

A good DUer would organize a DU centric "come from all over the country and get some tomato plants to take home/meet your favorite posters in person" weekend.

Just saying. I would drive from Michigan for the promise of some of your plants and even bring a dish to pass to a picnic, too. Talk to me sweetly, and I might even find a way to transport my Chocolate Raspberry Tiramisu.

kstewart33

(6,551 posts)
27. Nancy Reagan was very powerful as First Lady.
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 02:46 PM
Mar 2016

She was instrumental in firing a number of key aides to Reagan. She was also influential in Reagan's policy decisions.
I'd wager that the only First Lady with more power in the White House in the last 100 years were Eleanor Roosevelt and Hillary Clinton.

Nancy Reagan had no interest in baking cookies.

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
28. I can't honestly say how powerful/influential Hillary Clinton was as FLOTUS but I can say this
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 02:55 PM
Mar 2016

Bill Clinton will not be a passive partner in a Hillary presidency. The guy thinks he's smarter than anybody and that includes her. He is congenitally unable to keep his mouth shut and his opinions to himself. He will be constantly offering advice and blabbing to the media. She can't stop him during the campaign, theres no indication that she'd be able to stop him in the unlikely event she gets elected.

I had enough of him by about 1995. I really don't want him anywhere near the oval office again.

Arazi

(6,829 posts)
30. Really good point. I was one of those who was initially skeptical
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 03:13 PM
Mar 2016

Of your post yesterday although I qualified that with the point that I'm deeply uncomfortable with political dynasties.

In light of Nancy Reagan however, yeah, its a concern

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Nancy Reagan Grave Dancin...