2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumFactCheck.org CONFIRMS that Bernie infact DID vote FOR the auto bailout.
In fact, Sanders voiced support for a $15 billion package of aid to the auto industry after it passed the House Dec. 10, 2008, in the final days of the Bush administration. The measure was supported by President-elect Obama and an overwhelming majority of House Democrats, but died in the Senate when it failed to reach the floor for a vote.
https://www.factcheck.org/2016/03/factchecking-the-seventh-democratic-debate/
From the Washington Post -
Sanders is actually on the record as supporting the auto bailout. He even voted for it.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/03/07/the-hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-debate-over-the-auto-bailout-explained/
For someone that was interrupting Bernie last nite and saying "Make sure you tell the whole story" & for someone who has problems with voters seeing her as honest... all I can do is shake my head. She knows exactly what happened, she was there!!
What Bernie voted against was TARP because as he explained last nite he was against the taxpayer bailout of Wall Street Banksters.
W attached the auto bailout to TARP.
Renew Deal
(81,855 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)Roland99
(53,342 posts)ladjf
(17,320 posts)trumpeted the lie that Bernie didn't vote for the bailout. They know it's a lie but calculate that by the time Michiganders find out the truth,they will have already voted.
scscholar
(2,902 posts)Well?
senz
(11,945 posts)Just perfect.
merrily
(45,251 posts)And Bernie's a poopyhead, too!
senz
(11,945 posts)kind.
Call me AMUSED, dangit!
(And I do have a fondness for Zippy the pinhead.)
merrily
(45,251 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)Right now I'm about to take a nap. But nice to see ya, merrily.
merrily
(45,251 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Well, not in front of an audience, anyway.
kstewart33
(6,551 posts)Geez, what a George W. Bush thing to do.
Logical
(22,457 posts)Trajan
(19,089 posts)If sincerity and honesty means anything
panader0
(25,816 posts)Renew Deal
(81,855 posts)What she said was true
jillan
(39,451 posts)What she said last nite was not the whole story.
Fact check and even WaPo agrees!!
Renew Deal
(81,855 posts)Running as a legislator is tough.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Play all the Clintonesque games you want, it was deceptive and intentionally so.
ladjf
(17,320 posts)for the worse in American History. It will be "The lie of 2016 that sunk integrity in America".
We are in an extremely fragile situation. The last thing we need is for crooks to steal our Presidency.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)they just heel to the pre-ordained queen, like the good serfs that they are.
NHprogressive
(56 posts)Based on what I'm seeing here, people are having a hell of a time getting them to really think claims like this through, despite evidence directly contradicting them
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)Mufaddal
(1,021 posts)From FactCheck:
But at the time of the vote, it was by no means clear that Obama would use more than one-fifth of the $350 billion for an auto bailout. And most of the money still went for the bank bailouts that Sanders opposed.
So Clintons claim that her Jan. 15, 2009, vote was to save the auto industry is to be charitable quite a stretch.
kstewart33
(6,551 posts)No wonder he didn't say so in the debate. On the only vote that mattered, he voted nah.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Please see also, Reply 40.
kstewart33
(6,551 posts)I also got the part where he voted no on the auto bailout. You know, the vote that counted.
Bernie can't have it both ways. I voted for it, but I voted against it. But the vote against it doesn't mean anything in principle because I had voted for it at another time.
It's kinda like I voted for Hillary in the primary. Then I voted for Bernie in the election. But I really voted for Hillary because I voted for her in the primary.
Please.
Bernie knows the problem with this. That's why he did not explain the 'by no means clear' part during the debate.
Bernie's vote is his vote. I think that Michigan voters will know the difference.
merrily
(45,251 posts)kstewart33
(6,551 posts)And their vote counts, doesn't it?
fredamae
(4,458 posts)US Senate Roll Call Votes.
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/votes.htm
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)kstewart33
(6,551 posts)I think tomorrow their reaction to Bernie's vote will be the one that counts, don't you think?
CdnExtraNational
(105 posts)There was nothing in the TARP bill about the auto bailout when Bernie Sanders voted against it
Presidemt Bush and President Elect Obama rerouted some of the bank bailout to the auto industry in January 2009.
The Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) is a program of the United States government to purchase assets and equity from financial institutions to strengthen its financial sector that was signed into law by U.S. President George W. Bush on October 3, 2008.
monicaangela
(1,508 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts)It was blatant and underhanded politicking from her, and reveals yet again that she will stoop to anything to win.
Ugly stuff = ugly soul.
jillan
(39,451 posts)That's an ugly way to win.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)Low information voters will swallow.
Bernie's supporters would never allow him to utter that kind of half truth that disguises a shiv.
This is the kind of thing she did to Obama.
jillan
(39,451 posts)Sometimes I wish I wasn't such a political junkie so I wouldn't have to know how truly deceptive she really is.
grasswire
(50,130 posts).....is that we the people have to be the counter weight, the antidote, the remedy to her ugly tricks. We have to produce a vote so overwhelming that nothing she does can stop it. We have to be loud, and bold, and not afraid to speak truth to power.
jillan
(39,451 posts)She's relentless.
840high
(17,196 posts)0rganism
(23,942 posts)no explanations allowed, explaining doesn't work in debates and it doesn't work much better in campaign ads. waste of $$$, could make things worse if voters think he's stretching the truth.
speaking of which, "Hillary lied" and any number of variants thereof: completely useless, everyone (including her supporters) knows she stretches the truth into amazing shapes, those who like her appreciate the twisting for the skill involved or at least believe that it's somehow necessary. nothing to be gained there, another waste of $$$, possible bridge burner.
the only counter ad i could see working is some kind of historical montage showing all the times Sen. Sanders supported the auto industry and workers therein (can stretch this of course, anything that benefits industrial workers or American workers generally fits the theme), set to some kind of catchy retro music.
one advantage Sanders has is lots of popular musicians do not object to using their music in his ads.
however, Sanders is in a hole on this topic, and he needs to be careful to avoid digging in further.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Mr. And Ms. Six Pack doze off.
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Because most people will never know the truth.
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)billhicks76
(5,082 posts)She can't inspire people to register to vote...thus, hands over victory to Trump.
dflprincess
(28,075 posts)"the left" will be blamed for her defeat (even though it is liberals who are more consistent about showing up to vote).
It will never, never be her own fault.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)They dont care if we all lose and they are too blind and deaf to see thats what Clinton offers...a loss.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)iandhr
(6,852 posts)He had many chances to correct the record but he didn't
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)The OP is very misleading. It cuts out the conclusion Factcheck.org inescapably had to reach because it is a FACT:
https://www.factcheck.org/2016/03/factchecking-the-seventh-democratic-debate/
jillan
(39,451 posts)Against the wall street bailout. They were two separate bills. he explained that last night as well.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)The links in the OP confirm that. It is an indisputable fact that Sanders voted No on the TARP bill containing the auto bailout money. That is why Sanders did not correct Hillary but deflected with the irrelevant assertion that he "supported" the auto bailout. "Supporting" is not the same as voting Yes. Fortunately, it passed even with Bernie voting No.
The OP is very misleading.
jillan
(39,451 posts)Bernie voted for the auto bailout bill. It didn't pass because of GOP lead senate. W attached it to tarp which was the wallstreet bailout. Bernie explained that last night and factcheck Plus Washington Post confirmed that with Bernie said last night was correct.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)Bernie voted yes on a bill that was not viable because no Republicans wanted to vote yes on an "auto bailout only" bill. It died. So the auto bailout money was slipped into the TARP bill. The TARP bill was Detroit's only chance to get that money, since some of the GOP did support the TARP bill. Yet Sanders voted No. He placed his purity above the needs of Detroit.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)And, I hope the voters of Michigan respect that about him too.
merrily
(45,251 posts)SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)See Replies 36 and 47. He put his precious purity above the needs of Detroit. He refuses to compromise, much like Republicans. Compromise is how things get done in a democracy. That is why he has so few accomplishments to show for his decades in Congress.
merrily
(45,251 posts)He doesn't refuse to compromise. He got laws and amendment that he wrote passed by working across the aisle. She got nothing passed that she wrote other than purely ceremonial bills. She couldn't even get her unconstitutional flag burning bills passed--and Republicans introduce one of those just about every session.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)A LOT more "taxpayer dollars" would have been spent and a lot more misery would have been inflicted on the American people. It was a stupid vote on his part.
Other than naming post offices and getting a noncontraversial veteran's bill passed that was co-sponsored by John McCain, he has done little else. Hillary got SCHIP passed, which covered over 6 million kids. She got $32 Bllion for New York to recover from 9/11. She fought for women's rights around the world. Your hate for her makes no sense.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)silvershadow
(10,336 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)The bailout didn't go far enough IMO. It should have included some things like higher tariffs on imports, penalties for moving auto plants of building auto plants in places where wages are low to avoid paying workers what they need to live on, and a hard look at NAFTA and tweaking it so it doesn't hurt American workers.
Yallow
(1,926 posts)Please don't hurt anyone.
I mean it.
Free cash $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ for the oligarchs.
Here, have a couple pennies for the workers.....
What really happened is maddening.
Hillary sure wouldn't go there.
Too many of her owners made out like the bandits they are.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)they either relocated to a place where labor is very cheap and/or they outsourced a lot of labor.
chillfactor
(7,574 posts)Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)kstewart33
(6,551 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)https://www.factcheck.org/2016/03/factchecking-the-seventh-democratic-debate/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/03/07/the-hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-debate-over-the-auto-bailout-explained/
Words or voiced support is nice, but it's VOTES that pass legislation, and Sanders indisputably voted NO. Hillary did not lie about his No vote. Your OP is shamefully misleading.
calguy
(5,305 posts)That's when people were watching. Bernie lacks Hillary's debating skills. She was factually correct and Bernie blew it.
Land of Enchantment
(1,217 posts)individual perceptions. A fine line to walk. Yes, she is very skilled until something she never anticipated comes up. Remember her wandering out to Bin Laden when she was asked a tough question? Scripted, good memory, yes. Bernie gets more points for being so direct. She evades, he answers honestly.
Broward
(1,976 posts)Par for the course for her. She's as dishonest as they come.
Logical
(22,457 posts)whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Haven't you noticed?
Broward
(1,976 posts)Jitter65
(3,089 posts)ladjf
(17,320 posts)to the Auto Industry. Yes. Ten to eleven million dollars. That is chump change and had zero effect on the outcome. Please,anyone that saw the political show right after Rachel, help me out. I don't remember the name of the dishonest shill Michigan Senator that did everything in his power to make it appear that Hillary and Obama alone saved the auto industry and that Bernie by voting against the pocket change 11 million would have doomed the industry.
Anybody else see that show? Help out here.
JGug1
(320 posts)Odd that he didn't deny that he had opposed the vote. I did hear that exchange between the two of them though I missed the debate, having attended an Aaron Neville concert but I heard that part on Democracy Now. If he really did vote to support the bail out of the auto companies, I don't understand why he didn't deny opposing it.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)Read what is actually stated at the links in the OP, not the OP's misleading description of what is said.
BTW-- Aaron Neville is great! Saw him in New Orleans back in the 1970s.
ladjf
(17,320 posts)voted against the 15 billion dollar bailout.
I heard tonight on Chris Hayes show that it was a small portion of a 350 million dollar loan.
The entire amount that would have gone to the auto industry,according to what hayes said was,"ten or eleven million dollars" . The visiting Michigan Senator disregarded what Chris said and continued with his spiel that Bernie have voted against the 15 billion (or 12) bailout. That was untrue.
I'm trying to find a tape of that show that was on earlier tonight so I can verify what I remember hearing.
If you are a strong Hillary supporter, I doubt that you would be enthused about researching this point. On the other hand, if you are a very honest person you might look into it.
Bernie said that he didn't vote against the bailout. I believed him.
Hillary said he did. You believe her.
What we need is some incontrovertible truth.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)elleng
(130,864 posts)ladjf
(17,320 posts)He flat out lied and distorted the real situation about the auto money.
I'm sorry that I can't remember his name name.
They had been discussing the 15 billion dollar bail out package.
The host tried to correct the Senator by pointing out the total amount of the particular payment to the auto industry was 10 or 11 million dollars. 10 or 11 million, not 15 billion. But the senator talked right over him and profusely praised Hillary and Obama for saving the auto industry by approving 11 million dollar payment.
Please,someone the saw the show, fill in the details that I missed.
The Senator was an obvious out and out sell out to the Clinton Machine. I've seen lots of dirty sturr but this incident , right before the Michigan election, with Bernie moving with a tie, was the absolute worst example of dishonest behavior by a U.S. Senator I've ever seen. (Go ahead and hide my post. I'm expecting it.)
been nice being on DU for so many years.
moondust
(19,972 posts)If that's who you mean it was Sen. Gary Peters of MI who is a HRC supporter. He just rolled right over any attempt to get at the truth.
ladjf
(17,320 posts)Againstpayment to the auto industry for the particular TARP as 10 or 11 million dollars.
Think about that.10 or 11 million dollars divided between two Auto giants. The Senator insisted that that payment saved the auto industry from going out of business.
Perhaps Chris was wrong. But, he looked very troubled while the Senator did a major hatchet job on the truth. Does anyone have a recording of that show?
I have found some clarification. Not exactly what I said above but here it is.
http://www.factcheck.org/2016/03/clinton-sanders-bailout-brawl/
"We agree with the Sanders campaign that Clinton went too far in the debate when she claimed Sanders was against the auto bailout. In fact, as we pointed out, Sanders voted to advance a bill that would have provided $15 billion for the industry. He explained at the time that he supported the auto bailout bill because it would be a terrible idea to add millions more to the unemployment rolls.
Here is the chris hayes program
http://www.msnbc.com/all-in/watch/was-sanders-against-the-auto-bailout-639088707929
notice down around 6.45 minutes.
Notice that Chris said the amount for the auto industry 10 or 11 million. Sen. Peters said
"no it was more than that" "It was more than that".
How much was the auto part. It certainly was not up in the billions and certainly would not have been the amount sufficient to much difference either way.
Hillary flat out lied when she categorically stated that Bernie voted against the auto bailout.
She has a long history for this type of political tactics.
moondust
(19,972 posts)The M$NBC website is dreadfully slowwwww, almost unusable, but for anyone who is really patient: http://www.msnbc.com/all-in/watch/was-sanders-against-the-auto-bailout-639088707929
Incidentally, you may have seen the earlier segment with Soledad O'Brien on pushing the meme that "Bernie just doesn't know how to talk to African Americans." Um, do they not speak English or something?
ladjf
(17,320 posts)I also found information from a research company that said the Bernie did vote for the bailout and that the Clinton overstepped by claiming that the didn't.
Trouble is , Michigan votes tomorrow. By the time the truth comes out, the election will be over.
This is awful.
We've got Hillary on one hand, Trump and Cruz on the other. It's a horror show. I've never been this
worried about out Country as I am now. Bernie was our only hope to start cleaning up out Gov.
jillan
(39,451 posts)She knows why that bill didn't get passed. She was there.
She knows why he voted against TARP.
And she knows how hard it is when good things are added onto horrible bills and vice versa. AC even pointed that out when they were talking about the crime bill!
It's a mind game she plays. And she is a master at it.
And the stupid media goes a long with it.
ladjf
(17,320 posts)What a shame that would be. One of the most extraordinary politicians we've ever had, to be done in by a cheap, easily proven wrong, bald face lie. But, I'm afraid it will take a couple of days to get the truth out,if ever.
Bernie just might win this thing tomorrow.
jillan
(39,451 posts)if he does win, I am cracking open a bottle of champagne.
Every day I say I don't think I could lose more respect than I have already lost for Hillary.
And every day she proves me wrong.
ladjf
(17,320 posts)If he loses tomorrow, he still might win, but it will be a tough ride.
Jitter65
(3,089 posts)Just say'in
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)Clinton: He was against the auto bailout. In January of 2009, President-elect Obama asked everybody in the Congress to vote for the bailout.
I voted to save the auto industry. He voted against the money that ended up saving the auto industry. I think that is a pretty big difference.
After the Senate failed to act, President Bush decided to help automakers by tapping the Wall Street bailout package that Sanders had opposed and then Sen. Clinton had supported on Oct. 1, 2008. Specifically, Bush agreed to provide $13.4 billion to GM and Chrysler in Troubled Assets Relief Program funds, as explained in a January 2009 report by the Congressional Research Service.
Dec. 19, 2008: After Congress failed to agree on funds for the auto industry, President Bush announces that he will use the TARP funds to help bail out the auto industry. He said allowing the U.S. auto industry to collapse is not a responsible course of action. He authorizes using $13.4 billion of TARP funds for the auto industry immediately, and promises an additional $4 billion in February pending congressional approval of the final tranche of TARP funds, a reference to the second half of Bushs proposed $700 billion bailout plan.
Jan. 15, 2009: The Senate fails to pass a resolution that would have blocked the second installment of TARP funds. Sanders voted to block the release of the $350 billion, which as we said included $4 billion for the auto industry. On the Senate floor, Michigan Sen. Carl Levin urged his Senate colleagues to vote against the resolution and to provide the remaining $4 billion for the auto industry. We must complete the job started in December and ensure that the additional funding necessary for the financial health of this critical U.S. industry is provided in a timely manner, Levin said.
We asked the Sanders campaign about the senators claim that there was only one vote in the United States Senate on whether or not to support the auto bailout. Warren Gunnels, a policy director for the Sanders campaign, said the senators remarks were based on your fact check. But our fact-check mentioned two Senate votes that were designed to provide funding for the auto industry not just the one that Sanders now cites as the only vote.
Gunnels also said Sanders never believed that the [TARP] money would be used for the auto industry. Gunnels can safely say that about the first TARP vote in October 2008, and he can also safely say that Sanders could not envision that ultimately Bush and Obama combined would use about $80 billion of TARP funds for the auto industry. But Gunnels cannot plausibly say that Sanders did not know that the second vote in January 2009 did not contain funding for the auto industry. As we said, Levin spoke on the Senate floor about the auto industry, saying this additional $4 billion must come from the second $350 billion.
http://www.factcheck.org/2016/03/clinton-sanders-bailout-brawl/
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)Before Nevada's primary, before South Carolina's primary, and now before Michigan's primary.
It's not a coincidence, it's her campaign strategy.
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)Iraq had something to do with 9/11 (puke)
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Hillary has been on the radio in Michigan calling Bernie a guy who voted against auto workers and Michigan. She did not mention Bernie wanted a bill where the Banksters who robbed trillions were held responsible.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)ladjf
(17,320 posts)continue to spread the tactical lie that Bernie voted against the bailout.
This lie, of course, is strategically flaunted on the eve of perhaps the most important vote yet, that is the vote in Michigan.
Without a doubt, the Clinton campaign has be the slimiest operation I"ve ever seen in American politics other than the Bush operation to get us to invade Iraq.
If she is elected , it will be America's loss.
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)I hope Bernie continues to push to release the transcripts to those speeches.
SDJay
(1,089 posts)to kick the shit out of the staff at factcheck.org for their unruly behavior?
Since that's how democracy works in the DWS Democratic Party, right?
southerncrone
(5,506 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)Demsrule86
(68,543 posts)However, a month later, Obama asked for the Congress to free the money to keep GM alive in order for them to survive until inaugeration day...the GOP tacked the bill onto a larger bill that bailed out banks...Bernie voted against this bill...willing to allow thousands of auto workers to lose their jobs and our country the an entire industry...to vote against the banks which was popular at the time. Those who voted for the bill were attacked actually. Thus is was not a courageous stand. My hubs worked in autos; I followed it closely watched both votes the entire time...hubs was laid off most of the year...we barely survived...considered driving off a bridge so at least our kids would be provided for (life insurance). The auto loans added jobs and helped save the economy in my opinion:certainly it saved Ohio, and saved my family. Hillary held her nose and voted for saving autos because voting for bailouts was now toxic...Bernie did not. Americans were mostly against bailouts -included autos- Pres Obama and Secretary Clinton both risked political capital in order to save the autos. That is a fact. One I will never forget.
Jitter65
(3,089 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)"Senator Sanders voted against the TARP bill that would have rescued the auto industry in addition to the banking industry. Now, I fully understand why he did this and I fully support his decision. After all, my distinguished opponent is nothing but ethics personified and if it wasn't for him setting a sterling example for the rest of us during his 150 years of service, I shudder to think where we would be today. I mean, look at him. Is this the face of a man who wanted to see pain and misery inflicted on a truly American industry? I think not. So my distinguished, ethical, magical pixie-elf of an opponent should not suffer the consequences of his ultimate vote. Rather the American people should be on their knees thanking him for his sense of proportion. Thank you for the opportunity to talk about Senator Sanders."
[hr][font color="blue"][center]A 90% chance of rain means the same as a 10% chance:
It might rain and it might not.[/center][/font][hr]
kcr
(15,315 posts)I thought they were usually pretty reliable? But you're right. He voted no on the bill that actually bailed them out. Hillary did not lie and Bernie supporters who are claiming this are simply wrong.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)marew
(1,588 posts)Twist the truth, manipulate. etc. Hey, she has worked hard towards becoming one of the least trusted candidates around!
olddots
(10,237 posts)these parasites wii fight to the death for their castles made of sand .
Babel_17
(5,400 posts)If she's smart she'll defuse it between primaries. If not, Sanders has even greater license to challenge her truthfulness, and even honesty and integrity.