2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumErich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)2008 she was about abortions being rare, and only now is she willing
to fight against the Hyde amendment.
An after thought explains her quite well.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)Many here disagreed with me.
Yes, she has stated she'd fight against Hyde. And yeah, I think talk about any additional restrictions in any way is shit. But I think her comments are blown out of proportion and I have great respect and admiration for Cecile Richards and Ilyse Houge. I trust they've vetted her on reproductive choice which is, without question, my issue of passion.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)to the right. Thank you for your response.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)to their base or to not infuriate their most rabid foes. They're politicians, it's how they get elected. Her record on choice is strong and, to me, that carries more weight than a carefully worded response on FOX that was crafted to make her look like a baby murderer to their audience.
Notice she never said "ban" or even "restriction". She said "regulation". That's a politician and I don't fault her for being a good one.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)If she wins I hope she will succeed in doing the right thing for all women
at any stage of pregnancy.
Arkansas Granny
(31,514 posts)she favored preventing unwanted pregnancies, whenever possible, which would reduce the need for abortion services. I don't think she meant that choice should be limited or diminished. YMMV.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)and anyone implying otherwise is lying through their teeth.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)possibly made a financially and political choice.......... the PAC not the organisation I just want to point that out since Hillary has not done so in the past....
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)had a hand in it when she failed to mention that fact at the NV town hall.
Arkansas Granny
(31,514 posts)BreakfastClub
(765 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)There's nothing you can dispute in their statement so you attempt to throw that shit at the wall to see if it sticks.
Good luck.
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)you are running low on ammunition and you are outnumbered by your enemies outside the foxhole, you don't spend a bullet shooting one of your allies inside your foxhole.
Planned Parenthood is dying in Texas. Alternative non-profits are springing up to offer women's health and reproductive services where Planned Parenthood used to meet that need. With Planned Parenthood on life support (in Texas, I don't know how it's doing in your state), you don't attack your allies and alienate a quarter of your financial supporters. In Texas, this mismanagement could tip the balance between survival and death for Planned Parenthood, which is horribly sad because Planned Parenthood provides desperately needed services.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)want to ponder such a thing
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)itsrobert
(14,157 posts)n/t
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)n/t
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)a moron who didn't do her homework on the issue?
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)Rating: Bernie Sanders was rated 100% by Planned Parenthood Action Fund (Positions (Lifetime))
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)upset when some try to paint him as some sort of sexist that's all.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)But it's equally ridiculous to act as though Clinton would ban or further restrict abortion.
They are both strong allies.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Both candidates are superb choices for carrying on the fight in the face of Republican efforts to roll back the calendar. It's also why, on the very off chance my state actually ends up in play, I am willing to vote for Hillary in November, despite my adamant opposition to her in the primary (for economic justice/reform reasons) and huge questions about her character. Republican control of two out of three branches of government (and the chance to take over the third) would present a grave danger to all the progress we've made on abortion rights and more. Hillary may be too ready to take the center-right side on a lot of issues for me, but she'd never do anything but fight against anti-feminism with everything she has.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)who are too stupid and uninformed to realize how Bernie is the bestest thing ever? Is there anyone the Bernie supporters wont stoop to insulting with bullshit like this?
earthside
(6,960 posts)Sanders is undoubtedly a better feminist than Hillary Clinton.
He has been remarkably consistence on these kinds of issues during his Congressional tenure.
The PP Action Fund played a political game and let itself be turned into a hack political group because of elite connections and "good l'boy" influence peddling. (Ironic, isn't it?)
Hillary Clinton has for decades shown how she will flip-flop, say anything, trim her sails, do what it takes to advance her own political interests. Only the naive will believe that reproductive rights wouldn't be negotiated by her if she thought it was good for her advancement.
My giving to PPFund ceased when it decided a fraction of my money would go to promoting a candidate I heartily oppose. And I may not resume if this is the direction in which they are going to proceed.
I consider your entire screed nothing but sour grapes bullshit. Hillary has been fighting the choice issue for decades and I'm proud to be a monthly contributor to planned parenthood. And yes, you're only calling that disagrees with you stupid and uninformed. Good luck with that.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)must be tired or in denial...one or the other
earthside
(6,960 posts)Some of the more exercised Hillarians like to be provocative and argumentative, but once challenged they become immediately dismissive and churlish.
Sad thing is I see this in the real, non-cyber world as well.
Clinton is going to have a very tough time if (heaven forbid) she gets the nomination ... the fall campaign will devolve into a huge screaming maelstrom between Clintonians and Trumpians and voter turnout will plummet. And that probably means the election of Donald.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)the PAC who I believe may have a connection to the Hillary camp may of picked the wrong feminist your outrage is noted though
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)That would be Cecile Richards who you obviously think is a moron. But coming from someone who thinks emoticons are a substitute for real facts only makes me yawn louder.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)in my mouth and not take Hillary's own words to heart.............
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)It makes it easier to converse with the adults.
Svafa
(594 posts)auntpurl
(4,311 posts)it's "may have picked", not "may of picked". Not trying to insult you, just for information!
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)in the wake of the fraudulent right-wing slander.
Texas is in the process of finding ways to shift the woman's health services that Planned Parent provides to new organizations that do not use the words "Planned" or "Parenthood" in the title and are not affiliated with Planned Parenthood PAC. See http://www.utexas.edu/cola/txpep/_files/pdf/TxPEP-ResearchBrief-SurveyofReproductiveHealthClinics.pdf
This is a very sad development. For more background, see http://www.utexas.edu/cola/txpep/fact-sheets.php
Cecile Richards has been busy campaigning for Hillary while Planned Parenthood is dying in Texas.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)They don't really care if PP dies as long as they get something out of it. Why else would they purposefully alienate half of the Democrats who donate to them?