Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
48 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Planned Parenthood PAC may of endorsed the wrong feminist (Original Post) UglyGreed Mar 2016 OP
The PP endorsement was never about who was more pro-choice. nt Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2016 #1
Spot on UglyGreed Mar 2016 #3
They picked the candidate who makes reproductive choice a priority, not an afterthought. PeaceNikki Mar 2016 #2
When politically expedient, or do you feel her evolving is about something else? Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #5
Yeah, I took great issue with "rare", review my journal of you doubt that. PeaceNikki Mar 2016 #9
As long as she doesn't change back and that is where she loses me on trust, often acquiesing Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #11
There's no doubt that politicians choose their words carefully to either pander PeaceNikki Mar 2016 #14
I understand that, but I am referring to her record going back to 2008. n/t Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #15
Me, too. Her *record* is strong. Her choice of words can sometimes be annoying. PeaceNikki Mar 2016 #17
Comes down to trust and political will, that's where you and I differ about Clinton. Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #18
I always considered her "rare" remark to mean that Arkansas Granny Mar 2016 #12
That's EXACTLY what she meant leftynyc Mar 2016 #28
The PAC UglyGreed Mar 2016 #6
Thanks. Many here are ignorant of that fact as well and wish to punish the clinics. PeaceNikki Mar 2016 #10
Well Hillary herself UglyGreed Mar 2016 #21
Thanks for the link. Very good analysis. Arkansas Granny Mar 2016 #8
Exactly. Hillary is the clear choice. nt BreakfastClub Mar 2016 #24
+1 nt NCTraveler Mar 2016 #25
They picked a candidate who hired the CEO's daughter (this is Clinton cronyism at its best) Attorney in Texas Mar 2016 #42
It's great that strong and powerful women form strong alliances. PeaceNikki Mar 2016 #43
The problem isn't the endorsement; it's the timing of the endorsement. When you are in a foxhole and Attorney in Texas Mar 2016 #48
#whatwouldtheydoifberniesaidthat beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #4
I would not even UglyGreed Mar 2016 #7
Hillary can do no wrong. If Bernie said that they would rake him over the coals. liberal_at_heart Mar 2016 #26
Plan Parenthood PAC under the Bernie Bus itsrobert Mar 2016 #13
actually it appears to be going under the Hillary bus ibegurpard Mar 2016 #16
Are you calling Cecile Richards leftynyc Mar 2016 #29
Looks like Bernie ended up under the bus... UglyGreed Mar 2016 #19
He's a great ally. They went into great detail about that. PeaceNikki Mar 2016 #20
I just get a bit UglyGreed Mar 2016 #22
To do that is utterly ridiculous. PeaceNikki Mar 2016 #23
That's why my feminism isn't part of my primary decision. Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #47
So now it's feminists leftynyc Mar 2016 #27
'Feminism' has nothing to do with it. earthside Mar 2016 #30
Yawn leftynyc Mar 2016 #32
leftynyc UglyGreed Mar 2016 #39
Typical anymore. earthside Mar 2016 #46
I wrote UglyGreed Mar 2016 #31
And who runs the PAC? leftynyc Mar 2016 #33
Go ahead put words UglyGreed Mar 2016 #35
I do love the ignore button leftynyc Mar 2016 #37
Oh UglyGreed Mar 2016 #38
This picture made me yawn. Svafa Mar 2016 #45
Just as a side note... auntpurl Mar 2016 #34
Oops UglyGreed Mar 2016 #36
Planned Parenthood PAC is the 2016 ACORN. Injured by a false right-wing meme; killed by mismanagent Attorney in Texas Mar 2016 #40
PP leadership is more interested in personal gain than women's health. liberal_at_heart Mar 2016 #41
Planned Parenthood lost the fight in Texas and now they are just picking plunder off the battlefield Attorney in Texas Mar 2016 #44

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
5. When politically expedient, or do you feel her evolving is about something else?
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 10:20 PM
Mar 2016

2008 she was about abortions being rare, and only now is she willing
to fight against the Hyde amendment.

An after thought explains her quite well.

PeaceNikki

(27,985 posts)
9. Yeah, I took great issue with "rare", review my journal of you doubt that.
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 10:24 PM
Mar 2016

Many here disagreed with me.

Yes, she has stated she'd fight against Hyde. And yeah, I think talk about any additional restrictions in any way is shit. But I think her comments are blown out of proportion and I have great respect and admiration for Cecile Richards and Ilyse Houge. I trust they've vetted her on reproductive choice which is, without question, my issue of passion.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
11. As long as she doesn't change back and that is where she loses me on trust, often acquiesing
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 10:29 PM
Mar 2016

to the right. Thank you for your response.

PeaceNikki

(27,985 posts)
14. There's no doubt that politicians choose their words carefully to either pander
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 10:34 PM
Mar 2016

to their base or to not infuriate their most rabid foes. They're politicians, it's how they get elected. Her record on choice is strong and, to me, that carries more weight than a carefully worded response on FOX that was crafted to make her look like a baby murderer to their audience.

Notice she never said "ban" or even "restriction". She said "regulation". That's a politician and I don't fault her for being a good one.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
18. Comes down to trust and political will, that's where you and I differ about Clinton.
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 10:45 PM
Mar 2016

If she wins I hope she will succeed in doing the right thing for all women
at any stage of pregnancy.

Arkansas Granny

(31,514 posts)
12. I always considered her "rare" remark to mean that
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 10:30 PM
Mar 2016

she favored preventing unwanted pregnancies, whenever possible, which would reduce the need for abortion services. I don't think she meant that choice should be limited or diminished. YMMV.

UglyGreed

(7,661 posts)
6. The PAC
Mon Mar 7, 2016, 10:20 PM
Mar 2016

possibly made a financially and political choice.......... the PAC not the organisation I just want to point that out since Hillary has not done so in the past....

PeaceNikki

(27,985 posts)
43. It's great that strong and powerful women form strong alliances.
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 12:30 PM
Mar 2016

There's nothing you can dispute in their statement so you attempt to throw that shit at the wall to see if it sticks.

Good luck.

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
48. The problem isn't the endorsement; it's the timing of the endorsement. When you are in a foxhole and
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 12:52 PM
Mar 2016

you are running low on ammunition and you are outnumbered by your enemies outside the foxhole, you don't spend a bullet shooting one of your allies inside your foxhole.

Planned Parenthood is dying in Texas. Alternative non-profits are springing up to offer women's health and reproductive services where Planned Parenthood used to meet that need. With Planned Parenthood on life support (in Texas, I don't know how it's doing in your state), you don't attack your allies and alienate a quarter of your financial supporters. In Texas, this mismanagement could tip the balance between survival and death for Planned Parenthood, which is horribly sad because Planned Parenthood provides desperately needed services.

UglyGreed

(7,661 posts)
19. Looks like Bernie ended up under the bus...
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 11:01 AM
Mar 2016

Rating: Bernie Sanders was rated 100% by Planned Parenthood Action Fund (Positions (Lifetime))

PeaceNikki

(27,985 posts)
23. To do that is utterly ridiculous.
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 11:06 AM
Mar 2016

But it's equally ridiculous to act as though Clinton would ban or further restrict abortion.

They are both strong allies.

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
47. That's why my feminism isn't part of my primary decision.
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 12:47 PM
Mar 2016

Both candidates are superb choices for carrying on the fight in the face of Republican efforts to roll back the calendar. It's also why, on the very off chance my state actually ends up in play, I am willing to vote for Hillary in November, despite my adamant opposition to her in the primary (for economic justice/reform reasons) and huge questions about her character. Republican control of two out of three branches of government (and the chance to take over the third) would present a grave danger to all the progress we've made on abortion rights and more. Hillary may be too ready to take the center-right side on a lot of issues for me, but she'd never do anything but fight against anti-feminism with everything she has.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
27. So now it's feminists
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 11:20 AM
Mar 2016

who are too stupid and uninformed to realize how Bernie is the bestest thing ever? Is there anyone the Bernie supporters wont stoop to insulting with bullshit like this?

earthside

(6,960 posts)
30. 'Feminism' has nothing to do with it.
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 11:35 AM
Mar 2016

Sanders is undoubtedly a better feminist than Hillary Clinton.

He has been remarkably consistence on these kinds of issues during his Congressional tenure.

The PP Action Fund played a political game and let itself be turned into a hack political group because of elite connections and "good l'boy" influence peddling. (Ironic, isn't it?)

Hillary Clinton has for decades shown how she will flip-flop, say anything, trim her sails, do what it takes to advance her own political interests. Only the naive will believe that reproductive rights wouldn't be negotiated by her if she thought it was good for her advancement.

My giving to PPFund ceased when it decided a fraction of my money would go to promoting a candidate I heartily oppose. And I may not resume if this is the direction in which they are going to proceed.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
32. Yawn
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 11:59 AM
Mar 2016

I consider your entire screed nothing but sour grapes bullshit. Hillary has been fighting the choice issue for decades and I'm proud to be a monthly contributor to planned parenthood. And yes, you're only calling that disagrees with you stupid and uninformed. Good luck with that.

earthside

(6,960 posts)
46. Typical anymore.
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 12:39 PM
Mar 2016

Some of the more exercised Hillarians like to be provocative and argumentative, but once challenged they become immediately dismissive and churlish.

Sad thing is I see this in the real, non-cyber world as well.

Clinton is going to have a very tough time if (heaven forbid) she gets the nomination ... the fall campaign will devolve into a huge screaming maelstrom between Clintonians and Trumpians and voter turnout will plummet. And that probably means the election of Donald.

UglyGreed

(7,661 posts)
31. I wrote
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 11:38 AM
Mar 2016

the PAC who I believe may have a connection to the Hillary camp may of picked the wrong feminist your outrage is noted though

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
33. And who runs the PAC?
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 12:01 PM
Mar 2016

That would be Cecile Richards who you obviously think is a moron. But coming from someone who thinks emoticons are a substitute for real facts only makes me yawn louder.

auntpurl

(4,311 posts)
34. Just as a side note...
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 12:03 PM
Mar 2016

it's "may have picked", not "may of picked". Not trying to insult you, just for information!

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
40. Planned Parenthood PAC is the 2016 ACORN. Injured by a false right-wing meme; killed by mismanagent
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 12:25 PM
Mar 2016

in the wake of the fraudulent right-wing slander.

Texas is in the process of finding ways to shift the woman's health services that Planned Parent provides to new organizations that do not use the words "Planned" or "Parenthood" in the title and are not affiliated with Planned Parenthood PAC. See http://www.utexas.edu/cola/txpep/_files/pdf/TxPEP-ResearchBrief-SurveyofReproductiveHealthClinics.pdf

This is a very sad development. For more background, see http://www.utexas.edu/cola/txpep/fact-sheets.php

Cecile Richards has been busy campaigning for Hillary while Planned Parenthood is dying in Texas.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
41. PP leadership is more interested in personal gain than women's health.
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 12:28 PM
Mar 2016

They don't really care if PP dies as long as they get something out of it. Why else would they purposefully alienate half of the Democrats who donate to them?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Planned Parenthood PAC ma...