This Chart Can Win Sanders the Election and End HRC's Political Career
http://m.dailykos.com/story/2016/03/05/1496168/-This-Chart-can-Win-Bernie-the-Election-and-End-Hillary-Clinton-s-Political-Career-by-Bob-McChesneyEXCERPT.......
Hillary did at least 91 talks, each for a minimum fee of $100,000, to corporations, trade associations and a handful of nonprofit groups from January 2013 to April 2015. The total amount of money that Hillary raised doing these 91 private talks was $21.7 million, averaging around $225,000 a pop. This money did not go to her presidential campaign fund. It did not go to one of her Wall Street SuperPACS. No, it went directly into her personal bank account. These talks made her a spectacularly wealthy woman.
In short, Hillary revived the lost art of getting a direct personal payoff from the very corporate interests that have a clear stake in the policies and regulations she would pursue once she became president.
Thanks to my nephew Jed McChesney—the guy who produced this -- we now have a sortable chart that lists all 91 corporate talks, their dates and location, and the amount Hillary pocketed to her personal bank account for doing them. Some of these talks did not even require her to travel—she skyped them in.
Go through this list. Look at the companies that hired Hillary for a talk and what they paid her. These are almost all giant companies with massive lobbying armies and campaign donations associated with them. They have a lot of crucial business with the federal government. This sortable list is a moveable feast of corruption. Look up the identities of some of the groups you may not recognize. Some are massive private hedge funds. Note that Hillary got paid $1.6 million to do several talks to Canadian pro-Keystone groups.Gee, I wonder what she had to say to them? That might tell us a great deal about her actual stance of environmental issues.
= new reply since forum marked as read
Would shareholders approve of spending like that if there wasn't some promise of a huge ROI one day?
but then, they can never argue facts. So, slander, and emote replies...never a refutation. That's how the hillarians roll 
you guys would consider a guy whos 75 years old and wont be able to get 1 thing done with a gop congress IF he was the nominee.
The old, sorry OLD, cranky,creaky, interrupting, get off my lawn guy.
you guys are starting to sound like the Benghhaaaaazzzzziiiiii crown. If Sanders doesnt care about her emails, I dont care about her transcripts.
A link to Kos promising a chart, links to a Reddit page promising a chart, yet there is still no chart. People can post whatever they want on either site, with no editing or concern about sources. It takes absolute disregard for evidence to vest any credibility in that. And this from people who insist The Washington Post is illegitimate because it dares to suggest Bernie may not be infallible.
Corruption is not receiving a paycheck. There is nothing in Clintons voting record that indicates she sold out to those corporations. She didn't vote for blanket immunity for an entire corporate industry that profits from killing. She doesn't pretend to oppose defense spending while voting for and defending over a trillion dollars in corporate welfare for Lockheed Martin. Those are the votes of a candidate who claims to stand up for corporate accountability yet applies that concept extremely selectively.
Yet favors to corporations don't cause a bit of concern. Instead the sin is earning money, at least when Clinton does it. The richest presidents in history are routinely hailed as heroes here, while a hedge find millionaire running for Senate is treated as a progressive hero. Policy and voting record, irrelevant. Money, not a problem unless Hillary is earning it. There isn't even a pretense of intellectual consistency.
The GOP and " progressives" have been spreading crap about Hillary non-stop. Hundreds of millions of dollars later, she has 1.5 million votes more than Bernie and that margin is growing everyday. That means that despite what you all say about Hillary, voters still prefer her to Bernie. Think on that a bit. No matter how much shit flung at Clinton, voters still find Bernie unacceptable, and it sure is isn't because they haven't heard the output of the Rove machine propaganda.
Meantime, people who claim to be indignant that a woman earns two hundred thousand dollars for a speech are declaring their intention to vote for a bigoted billionaire, while others defend unfettered corporate profits for the gun industry over the rights and the lives of American citizens. All of this demonstrates in no uncertain terms that policy and principle come last.
Happy March 15! It is going to be a beautiful day. 
