Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

KingFlorez

(12,689 posts) Tue Mar 8, 2016, 02:07 AM Mar 2016

15

IL-Chicago Tribune: Clinton 67%, Sanders 25%

This is way above the Mason Dixon line, so it will be hard to write this one off.

24 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

IL-Chicago Tribune: Clinton 67%, Sanders 25% (Original Post) KingFlorez Mar 2016 OP

That's Hillary's home state Cheese Sandwich Mar 2016 #1

...it's ONE of her home states... Ken Burch Mar 2016 #3

They're confederates! They don't count! Cali_Democrat Mar 2016 #2

Who owns the paper? Who buys the polls?? NT 7wo7rees Mar 2016 #4

I don't know? Satan? KingFlorez Mar 2016 #5

Oh, there is the ticket. 7wo7rees Mar 2016 #13

thats what you get when you poll old ladies with land lines. litlbilly Mar 2016 #6

Do you actually think Sanders will win in Illinois? Zynx Mar 2016 #7

thats what im saying. lets see just how fucked up Ill is. Im from Chicago, i can say that. litlbilly Mar 2016 #10

This message was self-deleted by its author Qutzupalotl Mar 2016 #8

? No. This is next week. It's just showing how broad her strength is. Zynx Mar 2016 #9

Hey Zynx, what do you think now? :) litlbilly Mar 2016 #22

I sure hope you didnt put any money on it litlbilly Mar 2016 #23

Sanders totally has the nomination locked up KingFlorez Mar 2016 #11

Harlem Globetrotters 133, Washington Generals 62 6chars Mar 2016 #12

Wow.. great numbers! DCBob Mar 2016 #14

What, not "Clinton 128%, Sanders -28"? Whoever wrote this headline wasn't thinking big enough. Gene Debs Mar 2016 #15

sounds about right AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #24

And I'm sure Bill's been on the phone with Rahm. Gene Debs Mar 2016 #16

The oligarchs are laughing all the way to the bank. Broward Mar 2016 #17

It doesn't matter, Hillary is being investigated by the FBI. Major Hogwash Mar 2016 #18

Do you have a link for that? Chi-Trib on line says nothing about any poll azurnoir Mar 2016 #19

It wasn't supposed to be like this. ucrdem Mar 2016 #20

Bernie needs many BIG WINS if he hopes to take the nomination. This ain't gonna be one of them. NurseJackie Mar 2016 #21

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)

1. That's Hillary's home state

Reply to KingFlorez (Original post)

Tue Mar 8, 2016, 02:10 AM

Mar 2016

Just kidding.

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)

3. ...it's ONE of her home states...

Reply to Cheese Sandwich (Reply #1)

Tue Mar 8, 2016, 02:12 AM

Mar 2016

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)

2. They're confederates! They don't count!

Reply to KingFlorez (Original post)

Tue Mar 8, 2016, 02:10 AM

Mar 2016

It's not like Abraham Lincoln was from Illinois.

<<<------just in case

7wo7rees

(5,128 posts)

4. Who owns the paper? Who buys the polls?? NT

Reply to KingFlorez (Original post)

Tue Mar 8, 2016, 02:13 AM

Mar 2016

KingFlorez

(12,689 posts)

5. I don't know? Satan?

Reply to 7wo7rees (Reply #4)

Tue Mar 8, 2016, 02:19 AM

Mar 2016

7wo7rees

(5,128 posts)

13. Oh, there is the ticket.

Reply to KingFlorez (Reply #5)

Tue Mar 8, 2016, 03:34 AM

Mar 2016

Just the response to be expected.

Don't want to risk an alert.

litlbilly

(2,227 posts)

6. thats what you get when you poll old ladies with land lines.

Reply to KingFlorez (Original post)

Tue Mar 8, 2016, 02:22 AM

Mar 2016

Zynx

(21,328 posts)

7. Do you actually think Sanders will win in Illinois?

Reply to litlbilly (Reply #6)

Tue Mar 8, 2016, 02:24 AM

Mar 2016

litlbilly

(2,227 posts)

10. thats what im saying. lets see just how fucked up Ill is. Im from Chicago, i can say that.

Reply to Zynx (Reply #7)

Tue Mar 8, 2016, 02:33 AM

Mar 2016

Response to KingFlorez (Original post)

Qutzupalotl This message was self-deleted by its author.

Zynx

(21,328 posts)

9. ? No. This is next week. It's just showing how broad her strength is.

Reply to Qutzupalotl (Reply #8)

Tue Mar 8, 2016, 02:27 AM

Mar 2016

Michigan looks fantastic for her. She'll win by at least 10 points.

litlbilly

(2,227 posts)

22. Hey Zynx, what do you think now? :)

Reply to Zynx (Reply #9)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 03:38 AM

Mar 2016

litlbilly

(2,227 posts)

23. I sure hope you didnt put any money on it

Reply to Zynx (Reply #9)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 03:39 AM

Mar 2016

KingFlorez

(12,689 posts)

11. Sanders totally has the nomination locked up

Reply to Qutzupalotl (Reply #8)

Tue Mar 8, 2016, 02:33 AM

Mar 2016

6chars

(3,967 posts)

12. Harlem Globetrotters 133, Washington Generals 62

Reply to KingFlorez (Original post)

Tue Mar 8, 2016, 02:50 AM

Mar 2016

DCBob

(24,689 posts)

14. Wow.. great numbers!

Reply to KingFlorez (Original post)

Tue Mar 8, 2016, 03:37 AM

Mar 2016

Gene Debs

(582 posts)

15. What, not "Clinton 128%, Sanders -28"? Whoever wrote this headline wasn't thinking big enough.

Reply to KingFlorez (Original post)

Tue Mar 8, 2016, 05:02 AM

Mar 2016

AtomicKitten

(46,585 posts)

24. sounds about right

Reply to Gene Debs (Reply #15)

Wed Mar 9, 2016, 03:53 AM

Mar 2016

Gene Debs

(582 posts)

16. And I'm sure Bill's been on the phone with Rahm.

Reply to KingFlorez (Original post)

Tue Mar 8, 2016, 05:02 AM

Mar 2016

Broward

(1,976 posts)

17. The oligarchs are laughing all the way to the bank.

Reply to KingFlorez (Original post)

Tue Mar 8, 2016, 05:52 AM

Mar 2016

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)

18. It doesn't matter, Hillary is being investigated by the FBI.

Reply to KingFlorez (Original post)

Tue Mar 8, 2016, 05:56 AM

Mar 2016

Vote for her, vote for her twice, it won't matter later on.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)

19. Do you have a link for that? Chi-Trib on line says nothing about any poll

Reply to KingFlorez (Original post)

Tue Mar 8, 2016, 06:03 AM

Mar 2016

Not lead stories, not breaking, not trending -interesting that

http://www.chicagotribune.com/

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)

20. It wasn't supposed to be like this.

Reply to KingFlorez (Original post)

Tue Mar 8, 2016, 06:04 AM

Mar 2016

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)

21. Bernie needs many BIG WINS if he hopes to take the nomination. This ain't gonna be one of them.

Reply to KingFlorez (Original post)

Tue Mar 8, 2016, 09:40 AM

Mar 2016

Looks like this thing is ALL BUT OVER for Bernie.

FLASHBACK (ONE MONTH AGO): "THE WORM HAS TURNED: Barring unforeseeable events, Bernie Sanders will be the Democratic nominee."

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/2/7/1481253/-THE-WORM-HAD-TURNED-Barring-unforeseeable-events-Bernie-Sanders-will-be-the-Democratic-nominee

I'm guessing one of those "unforeseeable" events is that Bernie wouldn't have enough votes to win enough delegates to actually WIN the nomination.

Reply to this discussion

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»IL-Chicago Tribune: Clint...