Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tomm2thumbs

(13,297 posts)
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 10:17 AM Mar 2016

2012 Election Map and Current Primary Map






(Bernie in green, Clinton in yellow)


Seems like Bernie, even with razor-thin Iowa shown in yellow, is doing pretty good in a good number of states that will likely prove important to Democrats in the General Election. Especially since Obama's Democratic strengths still weren't enough to pull off the South in '12.

Looking good!!!!



8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

MineralMan

(146,286 posts)
1. Comparing a General Election map with a Democratic Primary map
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 10:41 AM
Mar 2016

is like comparing cherries to rutabagas. Now, I like both of those foods, but I eat them at different times. Same thing with primary elections and general elections.

This comparison is meaningless.

MineralMan

(146,286 posts)
3. Well, see, the same thing applies if you're
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 10:45 AM
Mar 2016

citing wins in Kansas and Nebraska. Again, primary elections in the Democratic primary are a completely different thing that nationwide presidential elections. There's no valid way to compare the two, since Democrats will not win in every state that participates in the primaries.

It's just not a comparison that is meaningful in any way, really.

tomm2thumbs

(13,297 posts)
4. I'm interested to see how the numbers in Florida compare R to D actually
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 10:47 AM
Mar 2016

and some of the other states that were carried by Obama in 2012

but definitely will be a different map in the fall, however it plays out

MineralMan

(146,286 posts)
5. That cluster of states in the Northeast will
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 10:51 AM
Mar 2016

vote Democratic in the general, regardless of who our nominee is. Some of the states Sanders is winning in the midwest will vote for the republican in November.

In primaries, voters from both parties are participants in choosing their party's nominee. How their state will vote in the general election is irrelevant. I know that pisses some people off, but that's how we do things.

There's simply no valid way to compare a primary map for this year with a general election map from a previous year's election. The two things are not even close to being similar, really.

The thing to watch during this Democratic Primary is the delegate count. Nothing else matters, really.

tomm2thumbs

(13,297 posts)
6. although I remember Hillary saying there were a lot of factors to examine
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 12:02 PM
Mar 2016

"I think it's also important to look where the delegates came from, how many people actually elected those delegates, what the kind of outcomes were, who has a bigger base to build an electoral majority on."

her words, not mine

tomm2thumbs

(13,297 posts)
8. it is valid according to Hillary
Tue Mar 8, 2016, 12:06 PM
Mar 2016

it was the reason Hillary held on till June so that everyone had a chance to vote, so I respect her opinion on its relevance - she's a pro at this stuff

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»2012 Election Map and Cur...