"Hillary Clinton holding narrowing lead over Bernie Sanders in Ohio, new poll finds"
Link; excerpt:CLEVELAND, Ohio — With the Ohio primary less than a week away, ... A Quinnipiac University poll, released Wednesday, of likely Ohio voters found Clinton led Sanders 52 percent percent to 43 percent. The university's last poll, released Feb. 23, had shown Clinton with a 55 percent to 40 percent lead, and with the exception of a Feb. 24 Baldwin Wallace survey showing the race as a virtual tie, polling in Ohio generally has shown Clinton leading by double digits.
...
It's worth noting that Sanders on Tuesday night narrowly won the Democratic primary in neighboring Michigan, even though polling there consistently had shown Clinton with a double-digit lead. Some political observers have asked whether this raises questions about the accuracy of polls in other Midwestern states with open primaries, including Ohio and Illinois, which along with Florida, are among the states that will hold elections on March 15.
Here is a link and graph for the February 24 Baldwin Wallace poll mentioned in today's article, above (in light of the polling discrepancies in Michigan, the Baldwin Wallace poll is likely more accurate):
= new reply since forum marked as read
narrowing a bit.
Last month she was 55 he was 40, now she is 52 he is 43.
On edit: Oops. 
It's tough to tell when someone is or isn't being serious around here these days. 
in an effort to keep calling her the democratic favorite. It's funny and disgusting all at the same time.
I hope Ohio can pull a Michigan !!!
I'll go ahead and call it for Bernie. WOOHOO!! 
I think Bernie will win again
has Hillary's chances of winning Ohio at 98% so there's hope.
The Mitchell Research poll said Clinton would win Michigan by 37% (66% to 29%) - it was a robo-call poll.
The Target-Insyght poll said Clinton would win Michigan by 32% (62% to 30%) - it was a robo-call poll.
If you graph these robo-call polls, you would think this is how the race would play out:
If you believed the robo-call polls, here is what you would have expected in Iowa:
and New Hampshire:
and Nevada:
and Oklahoma:
and Massachusetts:
These robo-call polls are horribly inaccurate (and they always seem to err in favor of Clinton).
The Hillary crowd is going to continue to post robo-call polls. Just remember how inaccurate they have been in Hillary's favor and don't give those polls any attention.
Likewise, when you see the Hillary crowd blathering about Nate Silver's forecasts, remember that 358 is basing its forecasts on robo-call polls mixed in with the other polling so they have this bias built into the forecast model. Remember, Silver's 538 gave Hillary a 99% chance of winning Michigan. Garbage in, garbage out.
I seem to have heard it someplace before. I expect it might become quite common.