Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
Wed Mar 9, 2016, 07:59 PM Mar 2016

Why the Clinton Camp Isn't Worried After Michigan Primary Loss



The key to this confidence? Delegate math.

A Democratic candidate needs 2,383 delegates, or representatives who will vote for them at the convention, to be eligible as the party's nominee. Although Clinton has only won four more states than Sanders, she leads him by more than 200 pledged delegates, 760 to 546.

"The important point of winning the nomination is that the delegates were by no means way split evenly," Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook said on a call with reporters, although he noted that he “obviously” wished the final results in Michigan had been different.

"By virtue of secretary Clinton's huge margin of victory in Mississippi versus Sen. Sanders' narrow margin in Michigan, we won many more delegates than Sen. Sanders last night,” Mook continued.

http://news.yahoo.com/why-clinton-camp-isnt-worried-michigan-primary-loss-225020135.html

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why the Clinton Camp Isn't Worried After Michigan Primary Loss (Original Post) onehandle Mar 2016 OP
Yeah we know they're not worried ibegurpard Mar 2016 #1
The supers Stuckinthebush Mar 2016 #2
She won't need the supers to win CorkySt.Clair Mar 2016 #3
Not at all Stuckinthebush Mar 2016 #5
They have absolutely nothing to worry about. Barack_America Mar 2016 #4
Right, football is another topic for her to consider discussing in Ohio JFKDem62 Mar 2016 #7
Um. So why all the posts here and news stories about now worrying then? revbones Mar 2016 #6
Yes, far better to eke out a slim victory than consider that maybe there's a problem. Warren DeMontague Mar 2016 #8
So tonight she pivots to the General? Ruby the Liberal Mar 2016 #9

Stuckinthebush

(10,843 posts)
2. The supers
Wed Mar 9, 2016, 08:17 PM
Mar 2016

And the massive delegate edge make it almost impossible for Sanders to win. He can virtually tie the remaining races and eek out a win but still lose. Of course he won't eek out wins in all states and he cant win by a large enough margin to pull the nomination.

Congrats on his victory last night. In the end it won't matter, however. It does keep him in the game a bit longer though.

Barack_America

(28,876 posts)
4. They have absolutely nothing to worry about.
Wed Mar 9, 2016, 08:19 PM
Mar 2016

Except they really need to be pushing gun control harder in Ohio and Southern Illinois. They're missing a big opportunity there.

JFKDem62

(383 posts)
7. Right, football is another topic for her to consider discussing in Ohio
Wed Mar 9, 2016, 08:36 PM
Mar 2016

Trashing the OSU Buckeyes would make a big impression with Ohio voters.

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
6. Um. So why all the posts here and news stories about now worrying then?
Wed Mar 9, 2016, 08:32 PM
Mar 2016

Seems like there's an awful lot of concern for something so easily brushed under the rug...

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
8. Yes, far better to eke out a slim victory than consider that maybe there's a problem.
Wed Mar 9, 2016, 08:43 PM
Mar 2016

Heaven forfend our campaign actually ask why Millennials can't stand us, for instance. Better to keep insulting and condescending to them.

Or ask how we're gonna carry a swing state like Colorado in November if every time we're asked about marijuana legalization we pivot to 'the heroin addiction problem'.

And so on.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why the Clinton Camp Isn'...