2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumNew Florida Poll (1/3 Surveyed Post-Michigan) Shows 68%-23% Clinton Lead
AlGiordano @AlGiordano 2h2 hours agoNew Florida poll (1/3 surveyed post-Michigan) has Latinos 73% Clinton, 20% Sanders: http://www.theledger.com/article/20160310/POLITICS/160319958#document/p11
dchill
(38,442 posts)Did Nate Silver take that poll?
bigtree
(85,975 posts)...and a closed primary.
dchill
(38,442 posts)I'm just messin' with you. I think we've seen enough to judge the validity of the average primary poll. I know I have.
hack89
(39,171 posts)Michigan certainly was an outlier but Hillary's string of blow out wins in the southern were certainly inline with polling.
bigtree
(85,975 posts)...she won the last contest in MS by 66 points.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)One poll is off and suddenly we have to throw out all the polls?
That doesn't make very much sense IMO.
jcgoldie
(11,612 posts)He just twists them to fit his corporate bias according to the Sanders supporters on this board... or is it his liberal media bias according to Romney supporters in 2012? Oh well whatever.
Closed primary. But polls only matter when it favors the other candidate.
riversedge
(70,084 posts)grossproffit
(5,591 posts)Roland99
(53,342 posts)Independents are turning for Bernie in a big way and their numbers are growing. They aren't turning to her in the primaries and likely wouldn't in the General Election.
Bernie is much more electable vs. any GOP opponent and the polls show it:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/2016_presidential_race.html
Cruz, Rubio, and Kasich all poll better than Clinton. Sanders wins against all. And by much larger margins vs. Trump
bigtree
(85,975 posts)...and there aren't any high delegate states where the vote is expected to be be lopsided in his favor.
Roland99
(53,342 posts)If Bernie is much more likely to win vs. GOP, I know *I* would be swinging my vote his way!!
Just depends on how much we all want to maintain the status quo w/the establishment or start down the path to fixing our political and economic systems to work for everyone!
bigtree
(85,975 posts)...every state where they do little more than split delegates puts him further behind, especially large ones.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)where Indies and GOPers can vote.
Gwhittey
(1,377 posts)The media just does not want to admit that the world has changed.
Those interviewed on land-lines were chosen by the random variation of the last four digits of their telephone numbers.
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)Much like the other southern states.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)(just in case )
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Its over.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)to overcome the huge AA and Latino vote for Hillary.
Yavin4
(35,421 posts)Any woman voting for Trump should be directed to counseling. It's like a African American voting for a KKK leader.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)...you have to remember that Hillary is not going to draw young voters to the polls. Sure, those that do show up will mostly vote for her. But I can't see any good argument against the assertion that Hillary tanks the young voter turnout nationwide. Even in Florida, which skews high in age demographics, this is a big problem. Barack Obama is President because both black and young voters turned out for him in large numbers. Hillary can count on only half of that equation.
The other fly in the ointment, of course, is Hillary's unpopularity with independents. Obviously left-leaning independents will vote for her (although I'd bet big money she suppresses liberal Indy turnout pretty significantly compared to Bernie). Conservative independents wouldn't vote for Bernie, either, so that's a wash. Moderate independents, in an election sometimes called "the year of the outsider?" If she ends up facing Trump, she'll get murdered in that demographic, and the election's basically over. Against Rubio or Carnival, it's up in the air.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)I think many will come to their senses by November and realize this is too serious to allow a lunatic like Trump to run this country
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)This is the first election in ages where I've not been participating out of a lingering sense of duty to a system I believe can no longer reform itself and actually represent the people. An election in which it's become obvious that it's actually possible for a candidate that's not part of the status quo to win...
But it also looks like there's a strong chance the American electorate, when faced with this unexpected choice, may well make that choice of outsider. At which point I'll probably revert to an even deeper version of my previous cynicism. If that's what we're going to do with this opportunity (pick the outsider when the more establishment candidate is clearly superior), then maybe representing the people isn't as good a thing as I thought it was. Democracy can't really work with an uninformed electorate.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)kennetha
(3,666 posts)and Virginia in both 2008 and 2012. Hillary could certainly replicate those feats.
Does that count as South enough for you?
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)Likely voters have often been voters who have voted in the last two primaries. This would mean that in order to participate in the poll, one must be at least 26.
In the meantime, if folks between 18 and 26 come out more, Bernie has a good shot.
I know that the poll conveniently has a slot for 18-34. Why do you think that they cut it off at 34, and not 30?
I don't know either.
I am just sayin' that this is the way most polling places go with their "facts."
Polls also showed Clinton to be way ahead in Michigan the day before the primary. If Bernie pulls off an upset in Florida, like he did in Michigan, or for that matter, any of the 15 March states, the momentum will have shifted, big time.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)Best he can do is cut into her lead. He can do that.
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)no "Today I'm a Democrat" voters?
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Thank goodness!
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)DebDoo
(319 posts)What does (1/3 surveyed) mean?
jcgoldie
(11,612 posts)1/3 of the people surveyed were called after that result... the assumption being that the surprise in Michigan may have buoyed his support elsewhere.
Thanks for explaining that.
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)Not that I have anything against old farts, being near to that age myself. But I don't vote like the majority of my fellow old farts.
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)pledged delegates OUTSIDE of the anti-progressive South?
She's looking more and more like a regional candidate.
kennetha
(3,666 posts)if she wins, North Carolina, Virginia and Florida in the general election does that count? You think that would be a bad thing?
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)states in 2020 after the Cruz administration puts us through 4 years of hell on earth.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)nominee is HATED by independent voters, is mistrusted even by a very large segment of Democrats, and inspires no enthusiasm from either group of voters.
I voted for Sanders in the primary and I hope to get the chance to vote for Sanders again in November, but -- no matter who we nominate -- I'm voting Democratic in the general election (even though I think Jill Stein is a fantastic candidate, I'm a Democrat and so I'll vote for Hillary over Stein if it comes to that, but I hope it doesn't come to that).
DCBob
(24,689 posts)So, once Hillary is our official nominee will you go after the Republican candidate with the same zeal you have gone after Hillary??
Somehow I doubt it.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)Arkana
(24,347 posts)bigtree
(85,975 posts)...or Buchanan.
No independents or republicans allowed to pad Bernie's votes in our Democratic primary in Fla..
Arkana
(24,347 posts)Let me guess--this makes me less of a liberal in your eyes?