Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 11:43 AM Mar 2016

2016 will be last stand for Democratic party hacks



The Democratic establishment has gone mad — and 2016 will be last stand for party hacks

Democrats keep losing Congress because they rally around lame centrists. Time to take a lesson from Sanders success.



Early last October, after New Hampshire Gov. Maggie Hassan announced she would run against GOP Sen. Kelly Ayotte next year, Politico reported that despite this piece of good news in the Democrats’ quest to retake the Senate, “their path to victory is being blocked by potentially ruinous primary challenges in other key states.” Pesky voters! Who let them in? More specifically:

In four key states, each among the Democrats’ best bets to take over Republican seats, upstart challengers are mounting primary contests against the candidates party leaders feel have the best chance next November.

In Ohio, 31-year-old Cincinnati City Council member P.G. Sittenfeld is challenging establishment-backed, 75-year-old former Gov. Ted Strickland. In Illinois, former Chicago Urban League president Andrea Zopp is challenging another establishment candidate, Iraq War veteran Rep. Tammy Duckworth. In Pennsylvania, former Rep. Joe Sestak, whose unconventional style has consistently irritated Washington Democrats, is taking on Katie McGinty, a protégé of former Gov. Ed Rendell. And in Florida, liberal firebrand Rep. Alan Grayson is loudly attacking his House colleague Patrick Murphy, the establishment favorite, in the race for Marco Rubio’s seat.

It would be oversimplifying things to portray these races simply as reflections of Bernie Sanders’ challenge to Hillary Clinton, and nothing more. But given the dynamics of how top-down party endorsements and funding work, and the kind of grass-roots energy needed to challenge them, there is no denying that strong similarities are present.

More at link: http://www.salon.com/2016/03/12/the_democratic_establishment_has_gone_mad_and_2016_will_be_last_stand_for_party_hacks/


The Democratic Party is hungry for Real Change. Hillary, eternally bound by her Wall Street political largess, is wholly incapable of offering anything other than lip service to "change".

#Bernie2016 #LetsDoThis America

28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
2016 will be last stand for Democratic party hacks (Original Post) NorthCarolina Mar 2016 OP
kick and rec warrprayer Mar 2016 #1
K&R for truth! Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #2
The Democratic Party Leadership is hungry to maintain control; Liberals & Progressives are hungry Kip Humphrey Mar 2016 #3
You said that so well Jenny_92808 Mar 2016 #4
One of the fundamental axes of progressivism is to move control of government HereSince1628 Mar 2016 #5
Yes, "Accountability interferes with progress", a republicon meme that migrated to Dem circles with Kip Humphrey Mar 2016 #6
Recommended. H2O Man Mar 2016 #7
LOL... Duckworth is "establishment" and Grayson isn't? Blue_Tires Mar 2016 #8
I know RED BAITING when I see it. ish of the hammer Mar 2016 #20
The party hack (McGinty) is the upstart challenger in Pennsylvania. Divernan Mar 2016 #9
This is why I contribute to specific candidates ... KPN Mar 2016 #10
I absolutely agree - have done that myself for many years. Divernan Mar 2016 #11
That is what we are doing! Duval Mar 2016 #24
+1,000,000! dchill Mar 2016 #17
If I take many 'Bernie or Bust' types at their word wyldwolf Mar 2016 #12
Only if the centrists and hacks win revbones Mar 2016 #14
If you neolibs win we would anyway. We no longer have anything to lose. Thanks! Katashi_itto Mar 2016 #25
The 'progressive' movement as we know it marions ghost Mar 2016 #23
Bernie wants to change the system. Hillary wants to, at best, tinker with it. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2016 #13
YES! Uncreative and corrupt zombie hacks! Helen Borg Mar 2016 #15
We heard a knock on the door this morning. Duval Mar 2016 #16
I love this! artislife Mar 2016 #26
This is what it takes marions ghost Mar 2016 #27
is waiting for Wasserman Schultz to resign the only way to be rid of her? Can she not be removed? Gene Debs Mar 2016 #18
Strickland is another conservadem who needs to go. Fuddnik Mar 2016 #19
Unlikely bigwillq Mar 2016 #21
Hope so TheFarseer Mar 2016 #22
Seems like they're waiting for the repubs to implode, and become the new conservatives. arcane1 Mar 2016 #28

Kip Humphrey

(4,753 posts)
3. The Democratic Party Leadership is hungry to maintain control; Liberals & Progressives are hungry
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 11:57 AM
Mar 2016

for really big change; and Republicrats are hungry for authoritarian rule and stability. For me, it boils down to a fight over our future, a fight between corporate socialism and democratic socialism.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
5. One of the fundamental axes of progressivism is to move control of government
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 12:56 PM
Mar 2016

closer to citizens.

This is obviously a contrarian point of view for governing elites in almost every form of government on the planet.

The professional democrats being politicians would also like the facility to have authority to act with less accountability.

Kip Humphrey

(4,753 posts)
6. Yes, "Accountability interferes with progress", a republicon meme that migrated to Dem circles with
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 12:59 PM
Mar 2016

the Republicrat invasion.

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
9. The party hack (McGinty) is the upstart challenger in Pennsylvania.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 01:37 PM
Mar 2016

The article incorrectly lumps retired Navy Admiral and former U.S. Congressman, Joe Sestak, running for the United States Senate, in with the "upstarts". He is better described as a highly qualified and experienced, long time, independent Democrat whom the party hacks/insiders (like Rahm) have long loathed for his independence. He was forced into retirement from the Navy when he spoke out against massive military boondoggles. He then ran for Congress (after Rahm told him not to, saying no Democrat could win his district) and was elected to 2 terms and then ran for the U.S. Senate.

Sestak ran successfully for Pennsylvania's 7th congressional district, making him the second Democrat to win in the traditionally Republican district since the Civil War. The race was in the national spotlight, as it was profiled in Time Magazine as the harbinger of the national political climate of the 2006 elections and the most-watched swing district in the country.

Here's his performance in two terms as a U.S. Congressman:
Legislation and key votes

Sestak wrote various pieces of bi-partisan legislation that successfully passed Congress. In 2008, he was identified by the National Journal as "at the ideological center of the House."

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer named Sestak the most productive freshman member of Congress in 2007.

In the 111th United States Congress, Sestak's last term in office, Congress passed more bills written by Sestak than bills written by both of Pennsylvania's Senators, combined.

Most significantly, he created the House Pediatric Cancer Caucus, which he co-chaired; extended benefits for those seeking work (COBRA) as a part of the JOBS bill; co-wrote the amendment to give small businesses tax credits, as a part of health care reform, and moved the first significant federals funds into autism care and research, nicknamed the "Sestak Amendment."

As Congress' senior veteran, he was an original co-sponsor of the repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell as well as the repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act.

Sestak also heavily advocated for the end of tax payer-paid bailouts to banks in the Wall Street Reform Bill. Sestak voted for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, but lamented the fact that it did not provide enough accountability measures.

He also voted for the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009, the American Clean Energy and Security Act, and the Affordable Health Care for America Act.


He wrote and submitted one piece of legislation that generated attention, but eventually failed in Congress, was the first legislation to restrict the effects of the controversial ruling of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Sestak
He did not just jump in this year to run against an incumbent or higher ranking Dem. He's been running for the past 5 years for the Senate seat he very narrowly (two percent) lost in 2010 to GOP-er Pat Toomey, who outspent Sestak by some $7 million and still only squeaked out a victory. This was the year that the GOP swept up a lot of offices.

The state and national Dem. organizations didn't contribute a penny to Sestak's first Senate race, although he did get contributions from John Grisham, Jimmy Buffet and many, many military vets from around the country.

In 2015, the state and national Dem. party machines floundered through a couple of primary candidates who quickly dropped back out, trying to find someone - ANYONE - to run against Sestak, and finally, less than a year before the primary, came up with a pro-fracking candidate who has never held political office, who made a mockery of Pennsylvania's Dept. of Environmental Protection when she was appointed to head it, left it to work with fracking/Big Energy concerns and whose husband is a Big Fracking lobbyist. But, hey! in upside-down-world, she bills herself as the environmental candidate!

And h-e-e-e-e-r-e's the Dem establishment's candidate, Frackin' Katie:

http://energyjusticesummer.org/candidate-katie-mcginty-the-environmentalist-for-fracking-fact-sheet/
– After DEP, McGinty went to work as Senior Vice President and Managing Director, Strategic Growth at Weston Solutions, Inc., a gas industry consulting firm and member of the Marcellus Shale Coalition, enjoying the revolving door open to regulators among companies they are supposed to oversee. (McGinty’s LinkedIn Profile)

- McGinty more recently has worked for the shale gas industry as a business partner of Ed Rendell’s at Element Partners, which provides investment capital to shale gas industry start-ups. (“Keystone XL Influence Peddling Web Extends into PA Governor’s Race Via Katie McGinty” -DeSmogBlog)

– When McGinty ran for governor in 2014, she hired Mike Mikus to be her campaign manager. Mikus is a V. P. of IES Solutions, an energy consulting firm that represents the Colorado Oil & Gas Association and he is Executive Director for Consumer Energy Alliance’s Mid-Atlantic region which supports drilling on public lands. (http://www.solutions-ies.com/, “CEA Applauds Approval of Marcellus Shale Production on Airport Land by Allegheny County Council” -CEA)


Sestak is the highest ranking military officer ever elected to the United States Congress. But unlike Hillary, he is NOT a war hawk. He knows we need to have a viable military option in foreign affairs. As he says, military intervention is on the table, but it's at the BACK of the table, and it is the very last option to be utilized.

Following in his father's footsteps, Sestak was accepted into the U.S. Naval Academy immediately after graduating high school, during the Vietnam War. In 1974, Sestak graduated second in his class of over 900 midshipmen, with a Bachelor of Science degree in American political systems. Between tours at sea, Sestak earned a Master of Public Administration and a Ph.D. in political economy and government from the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University in 1980 and 1984, respectively.

Controversy stirred over his leaving of the navy, as it was reported that it was because he "ruffled feathers" within the Bush Administration and conflicted with Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld because Sestak pushed for spending cuts. In an investigative report by The Philadelphia Inquirer, Chief of Naval Operations Vern Clark stated that Sestak "wanted straight talk, and this put [Sestak] in the crosshairs. People are going to say what they want to say, but he challenged people who did not want to be challenged. The guy is courageous, a patriot’s patriot."

KPN

(15,635 posts)
10. This is why I contribute to specific candidates ...
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 01:48 PM
Mar 2016

as opposed to the DNC. I stopped contributing to the DNC when it struck me that they no longer seemed to represent my interests. If you want to make sure your money is working for you, contribute directly to candidates you support. THe DNC has lost sight of basic democratic principles it seems.

wyldwolf

(43,867 posts)
12. If I take many 'Bernie or Bust' types at their word
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 01:54 PM
Mar 2016

it will be the end of the 'progressive' movement as we know it. They'll spend years in the political wilderness.

 

Duval

(4,280 posts)
16. We heard a knock on the door this morning.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:07 PM
Mar 2016

I answered and there were two nice looking young men with Bernie buttons!! I said "Ohhhhh, it's Bernie People" and welcomed them into our home. We talked for about 20 minutes with these high energy guys about Bernie's policies. I was so excited and so was Victor. We're going to do some phone calling from home. I gave them my email and they will let us know when there are any rallies for Bernie, house parties, etc, close to our home. Just Wow!! I could feel the Bern, It's a feeling of excitement and determination.

Just Wow! I need to calm down. LOL Can you just imagine two retirees still in their pajamas meeting with 2 twenty three year old guys who drove from Tennessee to North Caroline to campaign? What a perfectly uplifting day.


Fuddnik

(8,846 posts)
19. Strickland is another conservadem who needs to go.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:12 PM
Mar 2016

When he was Governor, he had a plan to replace union janitors in state offices with prisoner labor.

 

bigwillq

(72,790 posts)
21. Unlikely
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:28 PM
Mar 2016

Especially if Clinton is the nominee. If Hillary is the nominee, it's status quo. Now, if Hillary loses the GE, then maybe someone will say "jeez, what happened? Maybe we do need to change things". But still unlikely. The DEM party will only do what its donors say. If the money drys up, maybe, just maybe, the party will change. If not, status quo.

TheFarseer

(9,317 posts)
22. Hope so
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:31 PM
Mar 2016

But I doubt it. They'll probably learn the opposite lesson - they need to be more like the republicans and squash the liberals even more.

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
28. Seems like they're waiting for the repubs to implode, and become the new conservatives.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:12 PM
Mar 2016

With a thin progressive veneer.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»2016 will be last stand f...