Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:50 PM Mar 2016

Politico today - "Sanders had big ideas but little impact on Capitol Hill"

Jesse Ferguson ‏@JesseFFerguson 39m39 minutes ago
From Politico today - "Sanders had big ideas but little impact on Capitol Hill" http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/bernies-record-220508#ixzz42i8hBMfW

Democrats who worked with the Vermont senator say he contributed to the debate, but rarely forged actual legislation or left a significant imprint on it.

At the heart of Bernie Sanders’ campaign is a promise to bring about sweeping change. But on some of the top issues at the center of Sanders' presidential bid -- health care, taking on the big banks and corporations, fighting for rights, raising attention to income inequality -- the revolution has been slow in the 25 years he's spent in Congress.

Sanders and Clinton both repeatedly turned to his Senate record at the Democratic debate in Miami Wednesday night. Clinton hit him for voting against the TARP II bailout, arguing that “if everyone had voted as he voted, we would not have saved the auto industry,” and attacked him for voting against the 2007 immigration reform bill.

"Madam Secretary, I will match my record against yours any day of the week," Sanders responded, in one of the many moments he brought up his Senate work.

He was on the committee that wrote Obamacare, he said again, and he introduced what he called “the most comprehensive climate change legislation in the history of the Senate.”

“I have been criticized a lot for thinking big, for believing we can do great things as a nation,” Sanders said.

Rarely has that thinking translated into actual legislation or left a significant imprint on it, according to Democratic members and their staffers who have worked with him.


read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/bernies-record-220508#ixzz42i8hBMfW
54 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Politico today - "Sanders had big ideas but little impact on Capitol Hill" (Original Post) bigtree Mar 2016 OP
Because INSIDERS CONTROL. I don't expect non-establishment to be allowed to pass bills Land Shark Mar 2016 #1
the ptb are throwing the kitchen sink, worried much? litlbilly Mar 2016 #2
When he is president I suspect he will have a slightly bigger stick. pangaia Mar 2016 #3
Hey, I think you just hit on Trump's reason for running! Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #23
Sorry your Candidate is such a disaster... but you should stop lying about Senator Sanders AzDar Mar 2016 #4
I didn't write the article hotshot bigtree Mar 2016 #6
Pointing out LIES is not a 'personal attack'. If you post bullshit, you'll be called on it... AzDar Mar 2016 #13
I'd rather not play the 'liar, liar' game bigtree Mar 2016 #16
... AzDar Mar 2016 #19
... Scootaloo Mar 2016 #28
Liar, liar. dchill Mar 2016 #30
Who is lying? The guy does not have an overwhelming record of visible achievement. MADem Mar 2016 #20
... AzDar Mar 2016 #21
Linking to your own links doesn't change the facts at hand. MADem Mar 2016 #25
The link LITERALLY contains a LIST. None Blinder, and all... Jesus Christ. AzDar Mar 2016 #26
What has he, in actual fact, ACCOMPLISHED? The only legislation MADem Mar 2016 #33
That creaking sound you hear is the moving of goalposts... AzDar Mar 2016 #35
Yes, you should lift with your legs so you don't strain your back. nt MADem Mar 2016 #36
Well, Clinton water-carriers would know about the need for not straining during the heavy-lift... AzDar Mar 2016 #40
I wouldn't know about that! nt MADem Mar 2016 #41
FFS gcomeau Mar 2016 #53
The man's own govtrack score shows his record. It is nothing to be proud of Number23 Mar 2016 #45
Really--the quality of discourse is just, well, mind-boggling. MADem Mar 2016 #47
He does not have a visible record of accomplishment on the Hill AlbertCat Mar 2016 #51
Irrelevant. You posted it, "hotshot." Do you not vet what you post? Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #14
Don't read THIS! dchill Mar 2016 #43
Just know that people who are genuinely happy with their candidate and his chances don't need to act Number23 Mar 2016 #44
We should stick with nice, safe, little thoughts, that the Republicans will like. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2016 #5
I wasn't aware they 'liked' any Democratic initiatives bigtree Mar 2016 #7
Then it doesn't make any difference that Sanders has "Big Ideas". Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2016 #8
no, it's a virtue to have big ideas bigtree Mar 2016 #10
Well "never" is longer rock Mar 2016 #17
Yes. Women's Suffrage was "never" going to happen when introduced. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2016 #22
Where were the Congresspeople to back up his initiatives? Armstead Mar 2016 #11
Yep. He's at the very bottom of the list. TheCowsCameHome Mar 2016 #9
What a coincidence I just happened to see this from the Atlantic earlier this week vintx Mar 2016 #12
This deserves its own OP. arcane1 Mar 2016 #32
So.... this statement: AlbertCat Mar 2016 #49
So it would seem, yes. vintx Mar 2016 #50
OUCH. MADem Mar 2016 #15
yep bigtree Mar 2016 #18
Right or wrong, many believe Clinton can better wrangle with the opposition and get things done. Garrett78 Mar 2016 #24
Just like Politico! n/t Peregrine Took Mar 2016 #27
The congress with the 20% approval rating didn't like Bernie's ideas? arcane1 Mar 2016 #29
That's Congress as a whole mythology Mar 2016 #48
That will also be his legacy after 4 years in the WH.. DCBob Mar 2016 #31
Bottom line - I sincerely doubt I would like whatever it is that Hillary does get done. djean111 Mar 2016 #34
Who Will He Appoint For EPA? FDA? FCC? Fed Reserve? DoD? DOE? DOJ? DrFunkenstein Mar 2016 #37
Your OP is wrong, again. Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #38
Politico should have spoken to Veterans before publishing this & asked them why they support Bernie jillan Mar 2016 #39
Politico Everyday: Agggghhh! The Establishment isn't Winning! Fawke Em Mar 2016 #42
kick bigtree Mar 2016 #46
Thanks for kicking your thread. At least Bernie doesn't have this on his record. Kalidurga Mar 2016 #52
So can I expect a story from FAIR about POLITICO nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #54

Land Shark

(6,346 posts)
1. Because INSIDERS CONTROL. I don't expect non-establishment to be allowed to pass bills
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 02:54 PM
Mar 2016

The system is rigged, so of course the real heroes rarely are able to get things through

 

AzDar

(14,023 posts)
13. Pointing out LIES is not a 'personal attack'. If you post bullshit, you'll be called on it...
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:14 PM
Mar 2016

dchill

(38,465 posts)
30. Liar, liar.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:47 PM
Mar 2016

Why don't you write a nice, long post about Hillary's legislative achievements?

I'm SO ready to be blocked!

MADem

(135,425 posts)
20. Who is lying? The guy does not have an overwhelming record of visible achievement.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:26 PM
Mar 2016

The fact that he sued because he thinks he'll get more votes from the seventeen year olds is a self serving thing, and has nothing to do with his legislative bona fides.

He's been on the Hill for 25 YEARS and he has damn little to show for it.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
25. Linking to your own links doesn't change the facts at hand.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:40 PM
Mar 2016

He does not have a visible record of accomplishment on the Hill, and he has been there for a QUARTER CENTURY--longer than many of his supporters have been alive.

It's great to claim to be against stuff, and claim to be for stuff, when there are no fingerprints on anything.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
33. What has he, in actual fact, ACCOMPLISHED? The only legislation
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:50 PM
Mar 2016

anyone talks about is that VA piece, which relied HEAVILY on the gravitas of John McCain to get it over the finish line.

25 years. A quarter century. Where is the Sanders - Blah Blah Act?

His touch has been LIGHT in the extreme. He's at the periphery, not the center. He pushes and pokes at the edges, he doesn't break ground.

 

AzDar

(14,023 posts)
40. Well, Clinton water-carriers would know about the need for not straining during the heavy-lift...
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 04:08 PM
Mar 2016
 

gcomeau

(5,764 posts)
53. FFS
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 09:17 PM
Mar 2016

The link you keep ignoring has a Big Long Fucking List of legislative accomplishments in it.

Try reading.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
45. The man's own govtrack score shows his record. It is nothing to be proud of
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 04:54 PM
Mar 2016
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/bernard_sanders/400357/report-card/2015

But that aside, I don't know what the hell is wrong with this place where people scream "LIAR" at someone for just posting an article that discusses Sanders' shortcomings as a politician. Does screaming "liar" somehow change the content of the article?

MADem

(135,425 posts)
47. Really--the quality of discourse is just, well, mind-boggling.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 09:12 PM
Mar 2016

If I have a different opinion about a politician, or if I do not believe they can do the things they claim they are going to do, my go-to phrase is not "He's a LIAR!"

I have to wonder what motivates that kind of commentary. Never heard that kind of aggressive vitriol here in years past.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
51. He does not have a visible record of accomplishment on the Hill
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 09:10 PM
Mar 2016

Only to the blind.... for those who just skim the surface.


Besides, what's the use of "getting things visibly done" if the things suck? Like voting to go to war, or to extend the Patriot Act?

Number23

(24,544 posts)
44. Just know that people who are genuinely happy with their candidate and his chances don't need to act
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 04:52 PM
Mar 2016

this way. Just remember that the next time you or anyone is accused of "lying" because you posted an article that dares to discuss Sanders' shortcomings as a politician. And you know good and well there will be a next time.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
5. We should stick with nice, safe, little thoughts, that the Republicans will like.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:02 PM
Mar 2016

i.e. Triangulation aka Collaboration.

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
7. I wasn't aware they 'liked' any Democratic initiatives
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:03 PM
Mar 2016

...where's the legislature to back up Sanders' initiatives?

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
8. Then it doesn't make any difference that Sanders has "Big Ideas".
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:08 PM
Mar 2016

That just take longer to achieve. Especially, when some Democrats would rather collaborate with Republicans to keep them from being achieved.

Like single payer health care and free tuition.

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
10. no, it's a virtue to have big ideas
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:13 PM
Mar 2016

...not necessarily the only consideration I'd expect from a candidate.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
22. Yes. Women's Suffrage was "never" going to happen when introduced.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:32 PM
Mar 2016

Just like the 8 hour work day, integration in the south, manned space flight, the end of smallpox, gay marriage, and hosts of other things that would "never" happen and were impossible.

Maybe we should have dismissed them in the same way that Bernie's "big ideas" of single payer health care, free education, and breaking up the banks, are being dismissed.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
11. Where were the Congresspeople to back up his initiatives?
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:14 PM
Mar 2016

Lobbyists speak much louder in Congress than some cranky Senator from Vermont.

And reading that article, there's a weird slant to it. It is filled with paradoxes like "one of the most inf;luential Senators" followed by "one of the least influential Senators."

And gosh, Clinron supporters are ready tom slam Bernie in an article. Gosh what a surprise.

TheCowsCameHome

(40,168 posts)
9. Yep. He's at the very bottom of the list.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:10 PM
Mar 2016

He's even had fewer investigations, accusations, and inquiries brought against him in all his years in the Senate - can you imagine that?

He's a real zero, that Bernie Sanders.

 

vintx

(1,748 posts)
12. What a coincidence I just happened to see this from the Atlantic earlier this week
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:14 PM
Mar 2016
Sen. Jack Reed used the term "extremely energetic" to describe Sanders, a friend and longtime colleague whose relationship with Reed goes back to their days in the House. "Last year when we had the scandal at the VA, he was incredibly effective, engaged in getting the legislation passed, in getting it funded. Frankly, without him, I don't think we would have gotten it done because there was a lot of name-calling but there wasn't a lot of constructive, 'OK, here's the resources. ...' And he did it," Reed said. "And it was a great testament to his skill as a legislator."

Sanders has a system, said Sen. Sherrod Brown, who served with him in the House before both were elected to the Senate in 2006. "He would call them 'tripartite amendments' because we'd have him and he'd get a Republican, he'd get a Democrat and he'd pass things. He's good at building coalitions," Brown said.

...

Burr, who said that he and Sanders reached an "impasse" in the VA talks before McCain volunteered to take the lead, said, "Senator Sanders understands what it takes to get legislation across the goal line."

"I think he's very outspoken in terms of where he is ideologically," Burr said. "But when he gets down to the need to get legislation into law, then I find him to be one who's willing to sit down and compromise and negotiate to get to a final product."

...

But he is not without friends on Capitol Hill and has spent decades building relationships with members that could help him to push a policy agenda through Congress in a way that President Obama has, at least until recently, been reticent to do.

"Clearly if you want to get anything done, you have to work with members of Congress and you have to work with members of both political parties," Sanders said. "I have done that and as president, I certainly would do that. But that's kind of what you have to do — no ifs, buts or maybes."


http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/07/bernie-sanders-is-a-loud-stubborn-socialist-republicans-like-him-anyway/450597/
 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
49. So.... this statement:
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 09:06 PM
Mar 2016
Rarely has that thinking translated into actual legislation or left a significant imprint on it, according to Democratic members and their staffers who have worked with him.

is a lie. A LIE.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
15. OUCH.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:17 PM
Mar 2016
On repealing Don't Ask Don't Tell, for example, Solomonese said that Sanders was never involved in either the daily strategy sessions or the public relations push that led to the policy being killed in 2010.
'It doesn't take away from the fact that he's 100 percent in his voting record,' Solomonese said. 'Anybody willing to step up and sit at the table and plan a path forward was more than welcome.'
In the House, leadership aides say Sanders was generally off on his own, essentially ignored by leadership and largely invisible on the floor. In the Senate, where policy discussions are held weekly during conference lunches, Sanders has consistently pushed for more attention to income inequality. Senators and leadership aides say that's influenced their thinking, and to an extent, their actions.
'On the issues that are his bread and butter issues on the campaign trail, he's certainly altered the conversation, but in terms of the change and the result, I haven't seen a lot of it in three years,' Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.), who serves with Sanders on the Budget Committee and has also endorsed Clinton, though he also describes himself as a Sanders fan.
That's the same amount of time Kaine has served with Warren. Kaine said the contrast is clear. She's influenced the debate 'dramatically.'


Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/bernies-record-220508#ixzz42iZ2szmD

bigtree

(85,986 posts)
18. yep
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:22 PM
Mar 2016

...it takes some creative thinking to imagine he'd have any more success with the campaign he's running against the party now, in office, than he did as an independent keeping the party at arms length.

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
24. Right or wrong, many believe Clinton can better wrangle with the opposition and get things done.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:35 PM
Mar 2016

As I've said before, I think the masses have to lay the groundwork for systemic change between election cycles. A daily, grassroots struggle to alter the culture starting at the local level. It's not enough to wait for the next presidential election cycle, glom onto the most progressive candidate and think he or she is going to change the system. I know that's easier said than done, as people have jobs and kids and other responsibilities. But, as Bernard Chazelle wrote years ago, "America has lefties but no Left." Until that changes, the system as is rolls on.

Going to some rallies, posting messages online and voting is easy. The day-to-day struggle at the local level is what's hard but necessary.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
48. That's Congress as a whole
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 10:09 PM
Mar 2016

Individual members of Congress are often far more popular in their district/state.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
34. Bottom line - I sincerely doubt I would like whatever it is that Hillary does get done.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:50 PM
Mar 2016

Also - yeah, Bernie didn't have anything NEAR the impact of war. That's a plus, in my book. Add in increased H-1B visas, fracking, the TPP - I have to say that today's episodes of "Why you guys should dump Bernie and support Hillary" get a big Thumbs-down.

They will have, as they say, little (no) impact.

DrFunkenstein

(8,745 posts)
37. Who Will He Appoint For EPA? FDA? FCC? Fed Reserve? DoD? DOE? DOJ?
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 03:59 PM
Mar 2016

Who would YOU appoint? Chief lobbyists? A revolving door for top executives?

Do you think it makes ANY difference?

Who would go after the fossil fuel industry aggressively?

Do you think it makes a difference if Clinton nominates a Monsanto executive to oversee the FDA? A Goldman Sachs exec for the Fed chair?

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
38. Your OP is wrong, again.
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 04:00 PM
Mar 2016
Bernie Gets It Done: Sanders' Record of Pushing Through Major Reforms Will Surprise You

What kind of experience does Bernie Sanders have? Let's take a look.

By Zaid Jilani / AlterNet
October 17, 2015

“I'm a progressive, but I'm a progressive who likes to get things done,” Hillary Clinton said at the first Democratic debate, in response to a question from moderator Anderson Cooper about whether she defines herself as a moderate or a progressive.

The implication was that progressive Bernie Sanders is too far to the left to accomplish anything—all of his ideas are pie-in-the-sky. You have to be able to find the bipartisan, “warm, purple space” as Clinton said earlier this year, to get anything done. Slate's Jamelle Bouie was super-impressed by this rationale, saying Clinton has “skilled use of bureaucratic power.”

The problem with this narrative is that it is completely false. Not only has Sanders gotten a lot more things done than Clinton did in her own short legislative career, he's actually one of the most effective members of Congress, passing bills, both big and small, that have reshaped American policy on key issues like poverty, the environment and health care.


The Amendment King

Congress is not known to be a progressive institution lately, to say the least. Over the past few decades, the House of Representatives was only controlled by the Democrats from 2007 to 2010, and a flood of corporate money has quieted the once-powerful progressive movement that passed legislation moving the country forward between the New Deal era and the Great Society. Yet, as difficult as it may be to believe, a socialist from Vermont is one of its most accomplished members.

Bernie Sanders was first elected to the House of Representatives in 1990, and many immediately doubted his efficacy. “It is virtually impossible for an independent to be effective in the House,” said then-Congressman Bill Richardson (D-NM). “As an independent you are kind of a homeless waif.” Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA), today an outspoken advocate for Hillary Clinton, said Bernie's “holier-than-thou attitude—saying in a very loud voice he is smarter than everyone else and purer than everyone else—really undercuts his effectiveness.”

As if things didn't look bad enough, in 1994 the Republicans swept into power in the House of Representatives, dashing the hopes of many that Congress could do anything progressive whatsoever. But Sanders was not content with tilting at windmills. He didn't want to just take a stand, he wanted to pass legislation that improved the United States of America. He found his vehicle in legislative amendments.

Amendments in the House of Representatives are often seen as secondary vehicles to legislation that individual members sponsor, but they are an important way to move resources and build bipartisan coalitions to change the direction of the law. Despite the fact that the most right-wing Republicans in a generation controlled the House of Representatives between 1994 and 2006, the member who passed the most amendments during that time was not a right-winger like Bob Barr or John Boehner. The amendment king was, instead, Bernie Sanders.

Sanders did something particularly original, which was that he passed amendments that were exclusively progressive, advancing goals such as reducing poverty and helping the environment, and he was able to get bipartisan coalitions of Republicans who wanted to shrink government or hold it accountable and progressives who wanted to use it to empower Americans.

Here are a few examples of the amendments Sanders passed by building unusual but effective coalitions:

Corporate Crime Accountability (February 1995): A Sanders amendment to the Victims Justice Act of 1995 required “offenders who are convicted of fraud and other white-collar crimes to give notice to victims and other persons in cases where there are multiple victims eligible to receive restitution.”

Saving Money, for Colleges and Taxpayers (April 1998): In an amendment to H.R. 6, the Higher Education Amendments of 1998, Sanders made a change to the law that allowed the Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education to make competitive grants available to colleges and universities that cooperated to reduce costs through joint purchases of goods and services.

Holding IRS Accountable, Protecting Pensions (July 2002): Sanders' amendment to the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act of 2003 stopped the IRS from being able to use funds that “violate current pension age discrimination laws.” Although he faced stiff GOP opposition, his amendment still succeeded along a 308 to 121 vote.
Expanding Free Health Care (November 2001): You wouldn't think Republicans would agree to an expansion of funds for community health centers, which provide some free services. But Sanders was able to win a $100 million increase in funding with an amendment.

Getting Tough On Child Labor (July 2001): A Sanders amendment to the general appropriations bill prohibited the importation of goods made with child labor.

Increasing Funding for Heating for the Poor (September 2004): Sanders won a $22 million increase for the low-income home energy assistance program and related weatherization assistance program.

Fighting Corporate Welfare and Protecting Against Nuclear Disasters (June 2005): A Sanders amendment brought together a bipartisan coalition that outnumbered a bipartisan coalition on the other side to successfully prohibit the Export-Import Bank from providing loans for nuclear projects in China.

Once Sanders made it to the Senate in 2006, his ability to use amendments to advance a progressive agenda was empowered. Here are some of the amendments he passed in the Senate:

Greening the U.S. Government (June 2007): A Sanders amendment made a change to the law so at least 30 percent of the hot water demand in newer federal buildings is provided through solar water heaters.

Protecting Our Troops (October 2007): Sanders used an amendment to win $10 million for operation and maintenance of the Army National Guard, which had been stretched thin and overextended by the war in Iraq.

Restricting the Bailout to Protect U.S. Workers (Feburary 2009): A Sanders amendment required the banking bailout to utilize stricter H-1B hiring standards to ensure bailout funds weren't used to displace American workers.

Helping Veterans' Kids (July 2009): A Sanders amendment required the Comptroller General to put together comprehensive reporting on financial assistance for child care available to parents in the Armed Forces.

Exposing Corruption in the Military-Industrial Complex (November 2012): A Sanders amendment required “public availability of the database of senior Department officials seeking employment with defense contractors” – an important step toward transparency that revealed the corruption of the revolving door in action.

Support for Treating Autism in Military Health Care: Sanders worked with Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) to pass an amendment by a vote of 66-29 ensuring that the military's TRICARE system would be able to treat autism.

Using the Power of a Senator

While Sanders was an amendment king who was able to bring bipartisan coalitions together to make serious changes to laws, he also knew how to be a thorn in the side of the establishment until it offered up something in return. Sanders was able to get the first-ever audit of funds given out by the Federal Reserve, which made transparent over $2 trillion of funds handed out by the secretive organization. This was a cause that Republican congressman Ron Paul (TX) had been pursuing for decades, but Sanders was able to get the votes to do it by forging a compromise that required an audit for the bailout period alone.

When the Affordable Care Act was in danger of not having the votes to pass, Sanders used his leverage to win enough funding for free health treatment for 10 million Americans through Community Health Centers. This gutsy move—holding out until the funds were put into the bill—has even Republican members of Congress requesting the funds, which have helped millions of Americans who otherwise would not have access.

Another moment came when Sanders, who was then chair of the Veterans committee, worked with Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), to overhaul the Veterans Administration. McCain praised Sanders' work on the bill in an interview with National Journal. Sen. Jack Reed (D-RI) even went so far as to say the bill would never have passed without Sanders' ability to bring the parties to a deal.

His Theory of Change, From Burlington to the White House

The big question is, can Sanders translate his time as an effective senator into an effective president? After all, a legislative job is different than an executive job.

But Sanders has a theory of change, in order to be an executive who can pass progressive policy even in the face of a recalcitrant Congress. He frequently talks about a “political revolution” that means vastly increasing voter turnout and participation in political activities so conservative lawmakers and Big Money are unable to overwhelm public opinion. During the Democratic debate, this line had its doubters, from former Sen. Jim Webb (D-VA) to a skeptical Anderson Cooper.

Sanders is probably not so unsure of himself. After all, he's done it before. When Sanders was mayor of Burlington, Vermont, one of his big accomplishments was to increase civic life in the city. During the course of his terms, voter turnout doubled. In his eight years as mayor, he rejuvenated a city that was considered by many to be dying, laying out progressive policies that cities around the country later adopted, and he did all this without particularly alienating Republicans. As one former GOP Alderman noted, he implemented ideas from the Republican party that he felt were not particularly harmful to working people, such as more efficient accounting practices.

It's easy for the establishment media and politicians to make the assumption that Bernie Sanders is not an effective lawmaker or executive. He has strong convictions and he stands by them, and we're often told that makes one a gadfly—someone who is out to make a point rather than make an actual change. But with Sanders we have the fusion of strong principles and the ability to forge odd bedfellow coalitions that accomplish historic things, like the audit of the Federal Reserve or the rejuvenation of Burlington that has served as a model for cities around the country. “Don't underestimate me,” Sanders said at the beginning of the race, words that anyone who knows his political and policy history take to heart.

http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/bernie-gets-it-done-sanders-record-pushing-through-major-reforms-will-surprise-you

jillan

(39,451 posts)
39. Politico should have spoken to Veterans before publishing this & asked them why they support Bernie
Sat Mar 12, 2016, 04:02 PM
Mar 2016

over Hillary.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
54. So can I expect a story from FAIR about POLITICO
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 09:17 PM
Mar 2016

doing the same thing the WAPO did before Michigan? I get their emails, Looking forwards to it

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Politico today - "Sanders...