2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary Supporters: How many of you were PUMA's?
I have said many times that I am committed to supporting Hillary if she is the nominee. However, I find it counterproductive and kind of ironic how Hillary supporters are already demanding loyalty oaths and telling Bernie supporters they will be to blame if Trump wins.
So, I am curious, for all the Hillary supporters who are acting like it's already over and demanding our loyalty, can I assume that all of you voted for Obama both times and committed to doing so even before Hillary conceded? Can we assume that all of you vocally denounced the PUMA's in 2008?
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)I recognize a few.
LyndaG
(683 posts)After what happened in the 2000 election and eight years of Bush/Cheney, I gladly supported then-Senator Obama.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)onecaliberal
(32,826 posts)Bernie has ZERO to do with that. People can spout all the crap they want doesn't mean it's true and won't mean a hill of beans to me. You want to back a liar that is very Polarizing, don't be surprised at what happens.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)For all the noise made about PUMAs in 2008, there was an overwhelming Democratic vote that year and I think Hillary's strong endorsement of President Obama after the primary was over (which I have written about several times in terms of changing my mind about her, see my sig line) made some of that possible.
democrattotheend
(11,605 posts)She could have just given Obama a half-hearted endorsement and walked away, but she did a lot more for him and I appreciate that. I remember seeing her interviewed in July or August of 2008 and thinking "I am really glad she's on our side now."
Unfortunately, the same cannot be said for all of her supporters on DU or elsewhere. I remember many PUMA's on this site, and even those who were not PUMA's did not appreciate being interrogated about their loyalties, as we are being now.
And don't even get me started on the angry mobs who showed up for the DNC rules and bylaws meeting. I think many of them might have been Republican plants.
H2O Man
(73,536 posts)I do not believe that PUMAs were the creation or republicans. (And I am not basing that off of studies of republicans' sexual activities, and respectfully ask that we not go there. I hope no one even brings the topic up.)
More, there were quite a few PUMAs on DU, including long-time members.
As with literally everything, republicans no doubt attempted to exploit the situation. But they did not create it.
tkmorris
(11,138 posts)And I am quite certain you know that Steven.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)I don't remember any folks from the Hillary camp proclaiming they would not vote for Obama once it was all over.
I would need to see a link to believe that.
JohnnyLib2
(11,211 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Much less people who went PUMA.
It's not that they're not there, of course. It's just that for people whose sole and only concern is "winning" no matter what, admitting that htye backed a candidate who lost (twice, in the case of PUMAS) is just unthinkable.
Autumn
(45,057 posts)and I look forward to her losing this time. I can't wait till she loses again. I know of several anti HRC people back then who support her this time around and direct the same vitriol at Bernie Sanders and his supporters that they used against the HRC and her supporters back then.
oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)democrattotheend
(11,605 posts)I believe PUMA stood for "Party United My Ass." I find it ironic how many Clinton supporters are now pushing party unity.
I do not in any way condone the Bernie or Bust ideology, but I also think that it's obnoxious and counterproductive for Clinton supporters to act like they have already won and demand our loyalty now.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)For the same reason I want Sanders to drop out earlier than later now.
I want the nominee to be able to focus on beating up on the likely GOP nominee, not a sniping Democratic opponent.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)democrattotheend
(11,605 posts)Because it helped toughen him up and prepare him for the general election, and it kept both of them and the Democratic message in the news for a lot longer while McCain was largely ignored.
I think Sanders staying in helps Clinton as well, because with all the action on the Republican side, they are getting the lion's share of the media coverage and more people are hearing their message than ours. If Sanders dropped out it would be even more lopsided. Just as McCain struggled to get coverage during the Clinton-Obama race, Hillary would struggle to stay on the radar while the media covers the Trump show all the time.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)we would have prevailed.
It's always better to be able to start in on your General Election opponent earlier. Obama did this in 2012 with Romney, defining him as Mr. 47% in June if I recall correctly, a characterization from which Romney never recovered.
oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)Yes. The media has been wanting things wrapped up since before the first vote. I have stopped watching.
Thank you for the vocabulary lesson.
gwheezie
(3,580 posts)I supported her over Obama by a smidge. I thought she'd be tougher on the GOP but before the convention I knew Obama was going to be the nominee. I immediately started volunteering for Obama and by the time if the convention thought the right person had been nominated and still believe Obama has been a wonderful president. I have never regretted voting for him. In fact I was exhausted for the GE election so that might have been part of it but I cried with joy when I voted for him in 08. My daughter and her husband bought my then 4 year old grandson to "vote" for Obama and they took pictures of him standing in line to vote and put the I voted sticker on him. I wept, literally wept because someone who looks likey grandson became president my grandson will never have to wonder if the country is ready for him to be president someday. What a different world he will grow up in.
I voted for Obama in 12 with even more enthusiasm because Obama turned out to be much better than I had hoped for.
So yes, I had no problem voting for Hillary and then Obama twice. I thought the handful of pumas were insane. I am a democrat. I am a liberal. I will have no problem voting for either Bernie or Hillary.
rufus dog
(8,419 posts)I think both groups are almost entirely made up of a few Internet disrupters.
democrattotheend
(11,605 posts)Either that or people at the fringes of the Democratic Party who have frequently defected to the Greens.
hack89
(39,171 posts)kerry-is-my-prez
(8,133 posts)Dem candidate? Or is there something I've missed? I've seen a poll, have seen people declare that they will vote Green and people sort of "jump on them."
democrattotheend
(11,605 posts)Saying that if we don't vote for the eventual nominee we are enabling President Trump. I don't actually disagree with that statement, but I think it is way too soon for supporters of either candidate to be browbeating supporters of the other candidate about what they would do if their candidate doesn't win.
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)thanks
JI7
(89,247 posts)and they should be banned again this time .
RandySF
(58,775 posts)and the rhetoric I hear form so many Sanders supporters resemble what I heard from the handful of PUMA's back then.
still_one
(92,147 posts)can't say the same for those supporting Sanders though. There is a heck of a lot more on DU saying they won't vote for Hillary if she is the nominee today, while back then there were very few who said they would NOT support the nominee, and I was here.
I supported in the primaries and voted for Obama both time. , As contentious as it was then, that was child's play compared to the hatred expressed here against Hillary.
still_one
(92,147 posts)Those are the PUMA's with a different name today. Same garbage, just different clothes.
Those in 2008 who were PUMAs were an extremely small minority on DU.
I cannot say the same for those who say they will not support Hillary, if she is the nominee on DU.
MrWendel
(1,881 posts)JohnnyLib2
(11,211 posts)I'm not even sure there was such a thing, other than a small group of vocal holdouts somewhere. Very mysterious, yet the idea continues to be floated.
democrattotheend
(11,605 posts)But most of them were banned. Many were allowed to come back after the election.
Response to democrattotheend (Original post)
onehandle This message was self-deleted by its author.