Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Prism

(5,815 posts)
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 05:14 PM Mar 2016

The Clintons should be disqualified from public office

Kalidurga just shared this tainted blood scandal I had never heard about until now.

The Clintons' fingerprints are all over it.

Tell me honestly, these are the people we want running the country? After they presided over this?

I promise, it will be the most infuriating thing you will read all week.

http://www.encyclopediaofarkansas.net/encyclopedia/entry-detail.aspx?entryID=3732

Anyone who sees that and thinks, "Eh, no big deal" is not a liberal or a Democrat, IMO.

These two are a cancer on our party and our ideology.

73 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Clintons should be disqualified from public office (Original Post) Prism Mar 2016 OP
Well, it's a measure that might create undesirable precedents. Betty Karlson Mar 2016 #1
And this disqualifies Hillary from public office how? Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #2
People who have that going on should not be running things Prism Mar 2016 #4
I don't see a connection to Hillary, how do you involve Hillary? Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #9
This has nothing to do with the Clintons. leftofcool Mar 2016 #11
Didn't read the article and Clinton's involvement, did you. hobbit709 Mar 2016 #13
This is how it's done. Throw something ugly out there, just say the Clintons are connected or Jitter65 Mar 2016 #51
Evidently denial is just a river in Egypt to you. hobbit709 Mar 2016 #52
This going on while she was an attorney and First Lady of Arkansas, Waiting For Everyman Mar 2016 #58
Are you familiar with the real history of blood donations during this period of time? Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #59
Her "resume" includes her time as spouse. Waiting For Everyman Mar 2016 #60
I read the links, this does not disqualify her in any way of being elected Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #64
Sure. Waiting For Everyman Mar 2016 #65
Thank you. Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #69
Nothing there comes close to disqualifying her for office. NCTraveler Mar 2016 #3
Like I said Prism Mar 2016 #5
1) I never said I was fine with it. NCTraveler Mar 2016 #7
I read that this morning and I've been sick about it all day. Punkingal Mar 2016 #6
What did Hillary Clinton do in this scenario? Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #8
What does a program that started in 1967 have to do with Hillary? leftofcool Mar 2016 #10
What did Nancy and Ron have to do with starting the conversation on AIDS? Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #21
I knew nothing about this and rather than believe one link I looked into this. WOW Nanjeanne Mar 2016 #12
I sent that link to Stephanie Miller pdsimdars Mar 2016 #14
I can't listen to her anymore either. hedda_foil Mar 2016 #41
More RW talking points rechurned ... meh n/t cosmicone Mar 2016 #15
Not sure how this is a right wing talking point. Maybe you should watch the Nanjeanne Mar 2016 #16
This is what republicans have been throwing out at Clintons cosmicone Mar 2016 #17
Her history is tainted with controversy. smiley Mar 2016 #40
So Bernie and his disciples recycle dead controversies cosmicone Mar 2016 #44
I believe it is you whining about controversies... smiley Mar 2016 #47
How can you laugh at this? dana_b Mar 2016 #61
No one except Bernie supporters cares about mudslinging at Hillary. n/t cosmicone Mar 2016 #66
So you dismiss a factual issue calling it RW talking points and at the same time... Docreed2003 Mar 2016 #54
You linked to wnd in your above post obamanut2012 Mar 2016 #26
Sorry I was doing that for the review. Didn't notice the site. Here are other reviews Nanjeanne Mar 2016 #32
A cancer is something that invades the body. We all know what invaded the democratic body. William769 Mar 2016 #18
Yes, the corporate minions and their willing enablers. hobbit709 Mar 2016 #20
I'll live Prism Mar 2016 #22
Ah there's that honey dripping charm the Clinton crowd is so well known for. Not a word about the Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #23
Post removed Post removed Mar 2016 #27
Please fee free to point out the "liberal hate", yes that's a challange. William769 Mar 2016 #29
Proving my point, once again. arcane1 Mar 2016 #30
Oy vey. William769 Mar 2016 #31
Like the hate on Bernie posted in your little group and on your site? hobbit709 Mar 2016 #33
And there's no hate right here on DU about Hillary! William769 Mar 2016 #34
Who plotted to ban people? hobbit709 Mar 2016 #35
Cowards run and hide, after all. It's their nature. arcane1 Mar 2016 #36
So not up to the challenge I see. William769 Mar 2016 #42
Lmao. nt. polly7 Mar 2016 #39
Yeah I'll bet you'd hate to be the American people, too senz Mar 2016 #24
I'll proudly stand with Prism. Maedhros Mar 2016 #28
and Hillary supporters are the chemotherapy !! n/t cosmicone Mar 2016 #37
Sometimes it's not the cancer that kills, it's the chemo notadmblnd Mar 2016 #53
Thank you cancer specialist cosmicone Mar 2016 #68
My pleasure. notadmblnd Mar 2016 #72
Doesn't chemo also cause diarrhea, vomiting and loss of appetite? JackBeck Mar 2016 #73
Do the mods have a powerful anti-Clinton bias? Onlooker Mar 2016 #19
The owners of this site are wildly Pro Clinton. Your job is to offer a sound objection to stories Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #25
I read the article and the references at the bottom Dem2 Mar 2016 #38
Prism, I'll just say Aerows Mar 2016 #43
Ironically, the legal doctrine preventing what you're calling for is called "corruption of blood" Recursion Mar 2016 #45
Your subject line is exactly my thought when I read this Waiting For Everyman Mar 2016 #46
There's no way she will ever become the President now. Major Hogwash Mar 2016 #48
Hillary's name doesn't appear anywhere in there bigtree Mar 2016 #49
I love Bernie Sanders but... jcgoldie Mar 2016 #56
so putting BS in the WH guarantees an end to these scandals . . . got it DrDan Mar 2016 #50
That has absolutely nothing to do with it. A non-sequitur at best, a deflection at worst. n/t djean111 Mar 2016 #63
a manufactured issue period DrDan Mar 2016 #67
Sure jcgoldie Mar 2016 #55
Pretty awful hallio Mar 2016 #57
Thank you Prism Kalidurga Mar 2016 #62
That's pretty sad and tragic, but not Bill Clinton's fault, much less Hillary's Gram Parsons Mar 2016 #70
Quoting from the article noamnety Mar 2016 #71
 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
1. Well, it's a measure that might create undesirable precedents.
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 05:16 PM
Mar 2016

But that is the only potential objection I could raise against your opinion.

 

Prism

(5,815 posts)
4. People who have that going on should not be running things
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 05:19 PM
Mar 2016

It's one of those incidents you glance at and immediately assume, as a person with a working conscience, that everyone involved was run out of town on a rail.

 

Jitter65

(3,089 posts)
51. This is how it's done. Throw something ugly out there, just say the Clintons are connected or
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 07:29 AM
Mar 2016

responsible, and it become gospel. No proof, substantiation or anything else. Just say it!

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
58. This going on while she was an attorney and First Lady of Arkansas,
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 08:08 AM
Mar 2016

if she didn't know about it she's terminally unaware. Especially since there were two investigations into it during the Clinton tenure as governor.

I find that ridiculous to believe. Credulity doesn't stretch that far.

She and Bill knew about that prisoner blood poisoning the blood suppy and they let it happen. Anybody who died from AIDS during that time could have gotten the disease from that poison blood, directly or indirectly. And anybody walking around now with those or related health issues could have gotten it from that blood.

It was even spread to numerous foreign countries, which btw have litigated this all the way through to settlement for their citizens -- 2,000 cases in Canada alone. A bunch of other countries in Europ were affected.

I have two relatives who got transfusions during that time. My husband had more than a dozen back surgeries, and my daughter was hit by a car at 7 and nearly lost a leg. Both developed ongoing additional health issues that probably came from tainted blood during the transfusions. My husband died from all of the health problems he dealt with ever since that time, 20+ years, in 2007. My daughter's an adult, still struggling with hers.

I regard what was done in Arkansas -- knowingly poisoning the blood supply -- as little different from terrorism.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
59. Are you familiar with the real history of blood donations during this period of time?
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 08:11 AM
Mar 2016

BTW, when did the program of allowing prisoners to donate blood begin?

Furthermore are you going to hold Sanders responsible for actions of his spouse?

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
60. Her "resume" includes her time as spouse.
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 08:25 AM
Mar 2016

She runs on, and expects us to give her credit for all of that. And her official public positions in recent years only came to her because she was Bill's wife. As unrelated "Hillary Smith" she would never have been Senator from New York, nor Secretary of State. Whenever a problem arises from her participation as First Lady (for example acting as official spokesperson actively promoting a Clinton program like the Crime Bill or Welfare Reform), she was just a spouse bystander. When there's credit to be glommed, she was a partner. Don't even play that.

I'd suggest you read the links.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
64. I read the links, this does not disqualify her in any way of being elected
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 09:53 AM
Mar 2016

And holding office, she is the most qualified candidate running. Read up on the history of blood donations during this time period, study the history of prisoners donations, it just may provide insight.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
7. 1) I never said I was fine with it.
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 05:21 PM
Mar 2016

2) Nothing there disqualifies HRC from elected office as you wish.

Truly a frightening thought you are promoting.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
21. What did Nancy and Ron have to do with starting the conversation on AIDS?
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 05:58 PM
Mar 2016

You reap what you sow. This is very ugly stuff and the optics are old egg rotten. Enjoy!

Nanjeanne

(4,919 posts)
12. I knew nothing about this and rather than believe one link I looked into this. WOW
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 05:28 PM
Mar 2016

A documentary was made about this in 2005 called Factor 8: The Arkansas Prison Blood Scandal by an Arkansas documentarian, Kelly Duda. He spent 7 years making this film.

Here's a review of the movie: http://www.wnd.com/2005/10/33137/

And info on Kelly Duda https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelly_Duda

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
14. I sent that link to Stephanie Miller
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 05:31 PM
Mar 2016

I keep hoping she will stop promoting Hillary so hard. But she didn't blink an eye with the Reagan/AIDS comment. I don't have much hope for this either.
I like her show but can't listen any more because she is so unbalanced about it. She repeats every misleading talking point that the Clinton campiagn puts out. Never checking them and even after disproven she goes right on with them. At least Thom Hartmann looks into them and puts out the truth. Stephanie never does. Sad day.

hedda_foil

(16,371 posts)
41. I can't listen to her anymore either.
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 08:54 PM
Mar 2016

Hartmann is so careful to say nothing to damage Hill. Stephanie is continuously spinning like a top for her. Then, when they are on each other's shows, she tones it down a little. Frustrating.

Nanjeanne

(4,919 posts)
16. Not sure how this is a right wing talking point. Maybe you should watch the
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 05:45 PM
Mar 2016

documentary made about it. And the filmmaker who spent 7 years of his life doing it was never a right-winger.

But you already have your talking points down - so why bother researching validity.

 

cosmicone

(11,014 posts)
17. This is what republicans have been throwing out at Clintons
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 05:47 PM
Mar 2016

since 1985 ... or something similar.

It won't stick. Sad that supposed democrats are promoting it for the benefit of the free stuff party.

smiley

(1,432 posts)
40. Her history is tainted with controversy.
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 08:49 PM
Mar 2016

What a horrible candidate to nominate for president. She is going to destroy the party with all these 'unfounded' accusations she has been dealing with since 1985... or something similar.

 

cosmicone

(11,014 posts)
44. So Bernie and his disciples recycle dead controversies
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 12:18 AM
Mar 2016

and then moan and whine about the controversies !!!

dana_b

(11,546 posts)
61. How can you laugh at this?
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 08:29 AM
Mar 2016

Have you seen the film? Read the articles? It's not something that most people can just discard and then laugh off. These people that you are so vociferously defending are BAD people. They don't care a whit about you and will do anything for power.

And you may think that it's just because I support Bernie that I am saying this. No. It's because of stuff like this that i support Bernie.

Docreed2003

(16,855 posts)
54. So you dismiss a factual issue calling it RW talking points and at the same time...
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 07:42 AM
Mar 2016

Use RW talking points to dismiss Sanders supporters as the "free stuff" party...how very Mott Romney-esque of you.

William769

(55,144 posts)
18. A cancer is something that invades the body. We all know what invaded the democratic body.
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 05:49 PM
Mar 2016

I would hate to be you when we see Hillary inaugurated next year as President of the United States.

Have a nice day.

 

Prism

(5,815 posts)
22. I'll live
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 05:59 PM
Mar 2016

Other people won't.

But I know you care not at all, Bill. You got yours. That's all that matters. But hey, at least you're having fun!

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
23. Ah there's that honey dripping charm the Clinton crowd is so well known for. Not a word about the
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 06:01 PM
Mar 2016

subject matter, a nasty personal slam at another DUer, an snotty emoticon and that's all. It just vibrates with Hillaryness.

Response to Bluenorthwest (Reply #23)

William769

(55,144 posts)
29. Please fee free to point out the "liberal hate", yes that's a challange.
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 06:34 PM
Mar 2016

But remember liberal is not synonymous with Bernie. You just don't like what's being said about Bernie there or anywhere for that matter.

We await your results.

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
33. Like the hate on Bernie posted in your little group and on your site?
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 06:46 PM
Mar 2016

It's not the Bernie supporters who want to purge everyone.

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
28. I'll proudly stand with Prism.
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 06:33 PM
Mar 2016

An intact sense of integrity and decency goes a long way, even through the sting of political defeat.

JackBeck

(12,359 posts)
73. Doesn't chemo also cause diarrhea, vomiting and loss of appetite?
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 02:53 PM
Mar 2016

They probably shouldn't have chosen that (in their mind) clever response.

 

Onlooker

(5,636 posts)
19. Do the mods have a powerful anti-Clinton bias?
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 05:50 PM
Mar 2016

When are they going to stop these idiotic threads from being posted? I think I'm going to start a thread on Hillary murdering Vince Foster.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
25. The owners of this site are wildly Pro Clinton. Your job is to offer a sound objection to stories
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 06:04 PM
Mar 2016

you don't care for. Prove them to be wrong. Instead what you do is call for censorship of opinions you don't like. That's a basic problem with Clinton Culture, isn't it?

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
38. I read the article and the references at the bottom
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 08:27 PM
Mar 2016

What an awful situation, can't believe it almost caused the Canadian government to change parties.

Here's what I learned about Clinton's involvement in this:

Bill Clinton was governor of Arkansas at the time the tainted blood was being collected from the state's inmates.


Hillary is never mentioned.


Keep trying to find ways to disqualify Hillary from running for President, perhaps, unlike the millions of dollars spent by Republicans, progressives will finally take them down after recycling just the right story at the right time.
 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
43. Prism, I'll just say
Mon Mar 14, 2016, 11:45 PM
Mar 2016

that I am still so furious about the Nancy comments, and then there is *THIS*.

I cannot *FATHOM* why this hasn't been national news.

I've passed pissed. I'm incandescent with rage.



Recursion

(56,582 posts)
45. Ironically, the legal doctrine preventing what you're calling for is called "corruption of blood"
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 12:21 AM
Mar 2016
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Three_of_the_United_States_Constitution

The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
46. Your subject line is exactly my thought when I read this
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 12:34 AM
Mar 2016

this morning.

I can not imagine how we never heard of this before. That is a story in itself, and I hope we find out the rest of it soon. I'll have to watch the movie, maybe that explains it more.

I'll never get over shaking my head at this one.

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
48. There's no way she will ever become the President now.
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 07:00 AM
Mar 2016

It doesn't matter what some on the internet say about her, she's come undone.

bigtree

(85,984 posts)
49. Hillary's name doesn't appear anywhere in there
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 07:06 AM
Mar 2016

...and this hit piece doesn't present any more evidence than Bill Clinton was governor at the time.

This kind of shit makes this place look like a right wing site from the '90s. You should be ashamed promoting this crap.

jcgoldie

(11,626 posts)
56. I love Bernie Sanders but...
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 07:49 AM
Mar 2016

It's quite disturbing how easily his "more liberal than you are" supporters snatch hold of right wing and sexist bullshit and run with it.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
63. That has absolutely nothing to do with it. A non-sequitur at best, a deflection at worst. n/t
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 09:15 AM
Mar 2016

jcgoldie

(11,626 posts)
55. Sure
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 07:46 AM
Mar 2016

Because everyone knows a good woman is just an extension of her husband. She's obviously complicit in anything he does. Hard for me to even separate her identity from her husbands lets just call her Bill's wife. Nice job.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
62. Thank you Prism
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 09:03 AM
Mar 2016

I will do a write up soon on why this matters as far as Hillary's candidacy. That her supporters miss the glaring reason why it matters is telling indeed. That they can't debunk this says even more. They are the gift that keeps giving.

 

noamnety

(20,234 posts)
71. Quoting from the article
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 12:27 PM
Mar 2016

because some people are have trouble finding the section that involves Clinton:

"In 1985, the Arkansas Board of Corrections hired the Institute for Law and Policy Planning (ILPP) in Berkeley, California, to conduct an independent investigation into HMA’s practices. At the same time, Governor Bill Clinton ordered the state police to conduct a similar investigation. The institute discovered instances in which HMA had violated its state contract in forty areas, including poor health assessment and recordkeeping and the hiring of unlicensed, uncertified, and unqualified staff. In contrast, the state police investigation found only that a few HMA employees had been running a small-time gambling operation. Clinton urged a swift end to the investigation.

I can tell you that if my husband were in a position to be canceling an investigation into infecting thousands of people with poisoned blood, I would get informed. If I were an attorney - I would know everydamnthing about the situation. If I cared about humanity more than his political career, I would speak out about it. Start a national conversation about it, as they say.

And yet people can't find her name referenced anywhere - which they interpret as a good thing. I read it as she chose to stay silent.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The Clintons should be di...