Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SoCalMusicLover

(3,194 posts)
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 05:45 PM Mar 2016

Hillary Clinton & Her Supporters Own This Now

If she SCREWS this up, like many Sanders supporters like myself think she inevitably will, I blame every single last Clinton supporter for the fact we will end up with President Trump, or some other wacked out contested convention nominee.

She says she has this. Her supporters say not to worry, her positives will outweigh her public opinion negatives when election time comes. Fine. I'll believe you.

But if her support mysteriously disappears, or all the African American support she obviously has does not materialize in sufficient numbers come November, I will lose all respect I had for the Clinton legacy, and that includes former President Bill.

So good luck. I sincerely hope we don't lose the White House. I'll be voting for the Democratic nominee, but I'm not going to be as enthusiastic a supporter as I would be if Bernie were the candidate.

As for optimism, I have very little. Best case scenario is more of the status quo under Clinton. Worst case....well, I don't want to even think about that.

129 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton & Her Supporters Own This Now (Original Post) SoCalMusicLover Mar 2016 OP
No, I think Sanders supporters still "own it" too MaggieD Mar 2016 #1
So If She Loses In November, It's Bernie's Fault SoCalMusicLover Mar 2016 #10
It is the Nader theory UglyGreed Mar 2016 #38
No, it will be weak kneed Democrats fault for not voting for Bernie in the South !!! orpupilofnature57 Mar 2016 #52
But if she wins... quickesst Mar 2016 #105
As a former Bernie guy... I agree. Still In Wisconsin Mar 2016 #13
Shut up? No way artislife Mar 2016 #19
I think it's time. We lost, hard as that is to take. Still In Wisconsin Mar 2016 #26
There are still caucuses to vote in artislife Mar 2016 #36
Wow, that's off-the-charts crazy to tell anyone to "shut up." CoffeeCat Mar 2016 #50
I want all of the things you want. Still In Wisconsin Mar 2016 #60
The more delegates Bernie has come convention time, the more he can move the platform left. femmedem Mar 2016 #127
Since you are a former Sanders supporter, you're not part of the "we" that lost Doctor_J Mar 2016 #53
You are flat wrong. Still In Wisconsin Mar 2016 #70
Yeah, uh huh Arazi Mar 2016 #110
All noble goals. All goals I share. Still In Wisconsin Mar 2016 #114
Then you were never in it or you'd know its greater than one person Arazi Mar 2016 #116
Post removed Post removed Mar 2016 #117
Good post. Thank you. NurseJackie Mar 2016 #39
As you are an ardent Hillary supporter let me ask: Still In Wisconsin Mar 2016 #77
I voted for Hillary, and I hope Bernie will be given a featured prime time Tanuki Mar 2016 #93
I will be surprised if that happens Still In Wisconsin Mar 2016 #95
I think a public show of respect and unity would be a smart move. Tanuki Mar 2016 #97
Iagree that she ran very hard in 2008 BUT Still In Wisconsin Mar 2016 #107
" Now, it's time to sit down, shut up, and admit defeat" pangaia Mar 2016 #44
You don't need to shut up ... salinsky Mar 2016 #64
What reason does Hillary have to care what Still In Wisconsin Mar 2016 #72
For the sake of unity ... salinsky Mar 2016 #94
Not to be an ass... Still In Wisconsin Mar 2016 #96
Really? Shadowflash Mar 2016 #128
Not happening. Karma13612 Mar 2016 #84
No it is no longer my race. I am a Bernie guy but Still In Wisconsin Mar 2016 #85
Fine, but there are plenty more people to vote. Karma13612 Mar 2016 #89
Let the people vote. AtomicKitten Mar 2016 #122
You are correct Shadowflash Mar 2016 #129
Fuck that. GoneFishin Mar 2016 #91
I disagree mythology Mar 2016 #112
Uncomfortable facts are not smears. Sorry that the truth doesn't look kindly on your corrupt JonLeibowitz Mar 2016 #16
What facts? MaggieD Mar 2016 #34
See Post #56 for an inconvenient fact which I am sure you dismiss as a smear. JonLeibowitz Mar 2016 #62
List of "baseless innuendo": MelissaB Mar 2016 #17
But none of you ever have a shred of fact to back up anything MaggieD Mar 2016 #32
. MelissaB Mar 2016 #76
No, I'm just watching you deflect and post crap you can't back up MaggieD Mar 2016 #80
I thought you were on a time out. grasswire Mar 2016 #98
They spent months 72DejaVu Mar 2016 #79
Yep - as I predicted they would MaggieD Mar 2016 #83
I agree. bravenak Mar 2016 #103
No. She lost any hope of my support in 2008. Kittycat Mar 2016 #125
Her campaign told me that white berniebros who are passionate about their candidate JonLeibowitz Mar 2016 #2
They've made it very clear they neither want nor need his supporters' votes, haven't they? Scootaloo Mar 2016 #8
Honestly I couldn't care less MaggieD Mar 2016 #37
nader voters voted for nader, actually. That's why they're called "Nader voters." Scootaloo Mar 2016 #47
Oh drop that silly canard MaggieD Mar 2016 #51
200,000 democrats voted for Bush in Florida. That's the bald fact, maggieD Scootaloo Mar 2016 #56
No need to take my word for it - his own staff admits it MaggieD Mar 2016 #82
200,000 democrats voted for Bush in Florida. Scootaloo Mar 2016 #100
Nader denialism lives! redstateblues Mar 2016 #87
200,000 Democrats voted for Bush Scootaloo Mar 2016 #99
Yep, I'm just a racist, misogynist Berniebro, why would they want my support? nt Coincidence Mar 2016 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author PonyUp Mar 2016 #30
Exactly. They clearly don't want our votes. And she won't ever get mine peacebird Mar 2016 #57
I'm right there with ya. eggman67 Mar 2016 #119
Oh don't worry nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #3
So what. Blame. Some prefer to do, than to sit back and blame. seabeyond Mar 2016 #4
I plan to vote for the nominee Scootaloo Mar 2016 #14
If you vote for a Democratic candidate, and that candidate loses, how in the world would you seabeyond Mar 2016 #22
Because I've seen it before. Scootaloo Mar 2016 #55
Not from me. So why give it to me, as if it is a concern, let alone fact? seabeyond Mar 2016 #58
'Course. It hasn't happened yet. Scootaloo Mar 2016 #61
Which would be my point. You treated it as an occuring event. Yes, a prediction, guess, whatever. seabeyond Mar 2016 #90
One that I am nevertheless 100% certain of. Scootaloo Mar 2016 #101
You can be a 1000% certain and no different than a guess. Lol. Which has no certainty. seabeyond Mar 2016 #104
If she loses, not when Scootaloo Mar 2016 #108
good to know, but i didnt word it that way thinking you felt it was an inevitable loss. seabeyond Mar 2016 #111
If our people all vote, we win. Bleacher Creature Mar 2016 #5
" we lose because of that, it's on them." dana_b Mar 2016 #81
If only we knew what was good for us! Bleacher Creature Mar 2016 #86
What hypocritical bullshit. You are telling Bernie supporters what is good for us. BillZBubb Mar 2016 #102
+10000. eom Karma13612 Mar 2016 #88
No, it is really not on the voter -- it is on the political party Samantha Mar 2016 #121
A truly inspiring and uniting post. grossproffit Mar 2016 #6
what a juvenile thread. We're ONE party. Get a grip & grow up themaguffin Mar 2016 #7
One party, yes, but I still retain some values. I am not in lockstep with you. thereismore Mar 2016 #15
It's not about "lockstep" but it's about much more than a candidate themaguffin Mar 2016 #31
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2016 #9
Welcome to DU! grossproffit Mar 2016 #12
Welcome to DU ScorchedEarth themaguffin Mar 2016 #20
Please don't be a defeatist. bobbobbins01 Mar 2016 #11
Did this thread author even read Skinner's recent manifesto ? Trust Buster Mar 2016 #18
After the primaries in 2008 peace13 Mar 2016 #21
Should be a rule that calls for a Sanders concession must also address Hillary's 2008 actions. nt Coincidence Mar 2016 #35
Attention all Hillary Supporters: ANNOUNCEMENT! ANNOUNCEMENT! alcibiades_mystery Mar 2016 #23
I'll try not to lose any sleep over that ... NurseJackie Mar 2016 #48
Some people feel it's the voters to blame when a candidate loses Fumesucker Mar 2016 #24
It is the same kind of magical thinking nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #27
Sanders can't defeat her and she's the problem? Starry Messenger Mar 2016 #28
Why do you have the assumption that she will "screw" this up? She BreakfastClub Mar 2016 #29
No facts needed MaggieD Mar 2016 #41
Oh noes! nt onehandle Mar 2016 #33
If a candidate cannot win the primary/caucus of the party they have chosen to run in Peacetrain Mar 2016 #40
Yup Stuckinthebush Mar 2016 #46
I don't blame people who support Hillary Kalidurga Mar 2016 #42
Why the rush to declare "blame"? Thinkingabout Mar 2016 #43
Or " Responsibility " orpupilofnature57 Mar 2016 #54
Simply discussing! that's what comes to mind upaloopa Mar 2016 #45
Roger that. It's great that Clinton has your vote. Nt NCTraveler Mar 2016 #49
Blame yourself. Stand and Fight Mar 2016 #59
If Trump wins I'll blame Hillary for being a crappy nominee. nt PonyUp Mar 2016 #67
And I'll blame BS Supporters for having a toddler level tantrum and not showing up to vote. n/t Stand and Fight Mar 2016 #68
I'll show up to vote, but not for a Wall Strret war monger Goldman Sachs corporatist. Nt PonyUp Mar 2016 #69
Congrats on aiding in electing Trump and proving my point about toddler tantrums! :P Stand and Fight Mar 2016 #71
Sorry, but not voting for Hillary is not a vote for tRump. PonyUp Mar 2016 #73
LOL Stand and Fight Mar 2016 #78
straight to the ignore list. liberal_at_heart Mar 2016 #113
The horror! Stand and Fight Mar 2016 #123
you actually had respect for Bill? ibegurpard Mar 2016 #63
Will you be blaming Sanders too? joshcryer Mar 2016 #65
Best case is her administration will surprise you. randome Mar 2016 #66
Yes. PowerToThePeople Mar 2016 #74
It is not just the AA vote. There is also the Asian and latino votes as well. AgadorSparticus Mar 2016 #75
Who's saying not to worry? Donald Ian Rankin Mar 2016 #92
The voters do treestar Mar 2016 #106
I've been told more than once on this site that my vote isn't needed. vintx Mar 2016 #109
No they don't own this... smiley Mar 2016 #115
Thanks, I think we can handle it from here on out. nt ucrdem Mar 2016 #118
Yep. nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #120
Proudly. Gladly. (Thank you very much!) NurseJackie Mar 2016 #124
You have respect for the Clinton legacy? ChairmanAgnostic Mar 2016 #126
 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
1. No, I think Sanders supporters still "own it" too
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 05:47 PM
Mar 2016

First his campaign needs to stop smearing her with baseless innuendo, and his supporters also need to stop doing the same. Here and everywhere else.

 

SoCalMusicLover

(3,194 posts)
10. So If She Loses In November, It's Bernie's Fault
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 05:52 PM
Mar 2016

Good job, I was waiting for that. Because I'm sure it won't be her fault.

quickesst

(6,280 posts)
105. But if she wins...
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 09:11 PM
Mar 2016

.... and turns out to be a good or great president, I predict a lot of Bernie supporters will scatter like...cute little bugs... when the lights are turned on.

 

Still In Wisconsin

(4,450 posts)
13. As a former Bernie guy... I agree.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 05:53 PM
Mar 2016

Bernie fought hard and so did his supporters. Now, it's time to sit down, shut up, and admit defeat. I will be voting for Hillary because I am a democrat, but I am under no illusions that it is my place to contribute to the political conversation any further this election season. Hopefully Bernie will realize this soon and suspend his campaign.

It's your race, it's your convention. Congrats on a hard-fought win.

 

Still In Wisconsin

(4,450 posts)
26. I think it's time. We lost, hard as that is to take.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:00 PM
Mar 2016

This is probably how Hillary's people felt in 2008.

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
36. There are still caucuses to vote in
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:06 PM
Mar 2016

and liberal state and local reps to get in.

Nationally, why vote liberal on the down tickets and not at the top?

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
50. Wow, that's off-the-charts crazy to tell anyone to "shut up."
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:14 PM
Mar 2016

The values that Bernie and his supporters are championing will be fought for, until we get them.

A campaign finance-system that isn't corrupted by corporate money; a single-payer healthcare system; a complete stoppage of the neocon, war-based foreign policies; meaningful action on climate change; a decent minimum wage.

I will never shut up about these things. I will never stop voicing my opinion on politicians who abysmally fail on these important values and goals. I will always speak out and leverage politicians and other who champion these values and goals.

These fights began before this primary and they'll continue on.

Telling Sanders supporters to "shut up" really is a load of hubris that could sink a ship.

Elizabeth Warren espouses all of these values and I know that if she had run, she most likely would have beaten Hillary Clinton, several states ago. So, don't be so sure that our most heartfelt policy stances are dead, just because HRC has won more delegates.

femmedem

(8,201 posts)
127. The more delegates Bernie has come convention time, the more he can move the platform left.
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 07:01 AM
Mar 2016

Clinton can win the nomination while still recognizing that the Bernie supporters are a large block of voters and want their platform ideas fought for, and hard.

I also think that there are a sizable number of Clinton supporters who like Bernie's ideas but for whatever reason, think Clinton is more electable or more able to advance progressive ideas. I don't agree, but I understand that reasoning.

Especially considering how popular Bernie is with independent voters, I think the more we continue to push for Bernie's ideas (which happens as we continue to advocate for Bernie), the more likely we are to avoid a President Trump.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
53. Since you are a former Sanders supporter, you're not part of the "we" that lost
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:17 PM
Mar 2016

And if you want to sit down and shut up, we'll be grateful

 

Still In Wisconsin

(4,450 posts)
70. You are flat wrong.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:51 PM
Mar 2016

I have contributed financially beyond my means. I have made many phone calls and sent many, many texts for Bernie. I have listened to my own sister calling me a "fucking bastard" for supporting Bernie.


So, yeah. We lost. WE lost. You can live in denial if you want.

Arazi

(6,829 posts)
110. Yeah, uh huh
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 09:26 PM
Mar 2016


You're either with Big pharma, MIC, pro Wall St, pro Death penalty, pro more ME wars, pro equivocating on abortion, in support of fucking cluster bombs and coups. ..

Or you're not.

This movement goes beyond the man or you were just a poseur all along

Response to Arazi (Reply #116)

 

Still In Wisconsin

(4,450 posts)
77. As you are an ardent Hillary supporter let me ask:
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 07:03 PM
Mar 2016

Do you think Bernie should/will be allowed to speak at the convention? My sister (Hillary volunteer/supporter) says no way.

Tanuki

(14,918 posts)
93. I voted for Hillary, and I hope Bernie will be given a featured prime time
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 07:35 PM
Mar 2016

speaking slot at the convention. He has some great ideas.

 

Still In Wisconsin

(4,450 posts)
95. I will be surprised if that happens
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 07:42 PM
Mar 2016

I am guessing an early morning slot is more likely if in fact Bernie speaks at all. There will be some price to pay for running so hard against Hillary

Tanuki

(14,918 posts)
97. I think a public show of respect and unity would be a smart move.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 08:01 PM
Mar 2016

She ran hard herself in 2008, so I doubt she will hold it against him.

 

Still In Wisconsin

(4,450 posts)
107. Iagree that she ran very hard in 2008 BUT
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 09:14 PM
Mar 2016

Hillary and BO were so much more alike than Hit and Bernie. I think from Hillary's perspective she will need to squash what is left of our very liberal movement. We shall see

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
44. " Now, it's time to sit down, shut up, and admit defeat"
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:09 PM
Mar 2016

That's what Bonaparte told Alexander.

Look how THAT turned out.


salinsky

(1,065 posts)
64. You don't need to shut up ...
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:42 PM
Mar 2016

... keep advocating for your issues.

Bernie and his supporters have done yeomen's work pushing the conversation in the proper direction.

Keep doing it.

Throw your support behind the Democratic nominee, but continue to push her in the proper direction.

 

Still In Wisconsin

(4,450 posts)
72. What reason does Hillary have to care what
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:57 PM
Mar 2016

Bernie or his supporters think about anything? There are no points for second place.

salinsky

(1,065 posts)
94. For the sake of unity ...
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 07:36 PM
Mar 2016

... Hillary and Bernie aren't that far apart on many issues as a lot of people like to pretend.

 

Still In Wisconsin

(4,450 posts)
96. Not to be an ass...
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 07:47 PM
Mar 2016

but what issue are Hillary and Bernie NOT far apart on? Really not trying to be difficult.

Shadowflash

(1,536 posts)
128. Really?
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 07:23 AM
Mar 2016

She needs to care whether we show up at the polls if she is the nominee.

She's not winning without us and I'm not blindly throwing my support behind a substandard candidate because I need to ''get in line and shut up.''

Nope.

Karma13612

(4,552 posts)
84. Not happening.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 07:08 PM
Mar 2016

Bernie knows the people are emotionally and mentally invested in his campaign.

He will not quit before all the states have voted.

His whole purpose is to stir up this country.

If he wins, all the better.

As an aside, I find it interesting you would make this final statement:

It's your race, it's your convention


Isn't it yours also??
 

Still In Wisconsin

(4,450 posts)
85. No it is no longer my race. I am a Bernie guy but
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 07:13 PM
Mar 2016

it is over. There are no participation trophies in politics. It's basically like the NCAA basketball tourney. When you're done you're done.

Karma13612

(4,552 posts)
89. Fine, but there are plenty more people to vote.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 07:31 PM
Mar 2016

When you said former Sanders supporter, I kinda thought you meant you switched sides out of preference, not because of mathematics that is being prematurely suspended.

anyway, OK, yea, it IS my convention.

I would hope you change your mind and get back into the thick of it until the convention.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
112. I disagree
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 09:37 PM
Mar 2016

There is no reason for Sanders supporters to shut up. They should continue to work and advocate for the politicians and policy positions they believe in.

I don't just mean in terms of supporting Sanders, but if Sanders does lose, then I want them to find candidates at the national, state and local level to support. I want them to find other policies that they can make a difference in. If Sanders loses, it doesn't need to be seen as a defeat. Sanders has done far better than anybody expected 6 months ago. I don't want that passion to just dissipate. I want them to fight for a candidate like Russ Feingold in Wisconsin. I want them to fight at the local level for more affordable housing.

Telling them to sit down and shut up is at best not helpful and in a sense is harmful.

I have problems with both Clinton and Sanders, neither was my preferred candidate (Warren), but they both have policy positions that I like and more importantly, they both have policy positions that a lot of Democrats like. Why not say to Sanders and his supporters "hey you didn't win this time, but let's work together on things that we both believe in and learn from each other on other things.

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
16. Uncomfortable facts are not smears. Sorry that the truth doesn't look kindly on your corrupt
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 05:55 PM
Mar 2016

candidate. Oh well.

I will continue to post interesting truths as the primary campaign proceeds.

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
32. But none of you ever have a shred of fact to back up anything
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:04 PM
Mar 2016

I have been reading this nonsense for months, and it is always complete bullshit that is never accompanied by a single fact. Nothing. And you all know it.

72DejaVu

(1,545 posts)
79. They spent months
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 07:04 PM
Mar 2016

screaming at the top of her lungs that she is a liar, now they are deeply concerned that the public somehow got the idea she is untrustworthy.

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
83. Yep - as I predicted they would
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 07:07 PM
Mar 2016

I think that post where I asked if they would take responsibility for how their smears impacted the GE was my very first hide here.

Kittycat

(10,493 posts)
125. No. She lost any hope of my support in 2008.
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 06:40 AM
Mar 2016

And everything I thought she would do with an ounce of power, she has done to the maximum extent. And it's terrifying. From loss of life, corruption, continued lies, etc.

But I'm so glad Bernie is still out there working hard, and plans on taking this all the way to the convention. He has my vote, my support, and my backing. This has always been Hillary's to lose.

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
2. Her campaign told me that white berniebros who are passionate about their candidate
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 05:47 PM
Mar 2016

should be silent and ashamed to be outspoken on the issues.

Therefore she will not receive any support from me. It's her bed.

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
37. Honestly I couldn't care less
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:07 PM
Mar 2016

If you think it's okay to vote for Trump or pout it out, do what you gotta do. That's what the Nader voters did. And apparently they didn't learn jack shit from it.

But that is on YOU, and in the end you will only have yourselves to blame. No one else.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
47. nader voters voted for nader, actually. That's why they're called "Nader voters."
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:11 PM
Mar 2016

And i'm afraid that it was the 200,000 registered democrats who voted for Bush in Florida that caused the problem, more so than the 89,000 Nader voters there.

 

MaggieD

(7,393 posts)
51. Oh drop that silly canard
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:17 PM
Mar 2016

People don't go and change their registration from decades ago. You could use that canard to make that crossover argument in every election since the dawn of party registration. The fact is that 97K idiots voted for Nader in a swing state. No doubt for the same reasons people whine about with Hillary.

I simply do not give a crap about the threats any longer. Do whatever you want. No one cares.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
56. 200,000 democrats voted for Bush in Florida. That's the bald fact, maggieD
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:23 PM
Mar 2016

Stop trying to cut excuses for that fact.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
100. 200,000 democrats voted for Bush in Florida.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 08:44 PM
Mar 2016

The deciding factor was Democrats who thought Bush was a better candidate than Gore.

redstateblues

(10,565 posts)
87. Nader denialism lives!
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 07:20 PM
Mar 2016

That narcissist gave us George Bush and the Iraq war. The people in FL that voted for him need to own it. Instead they quote all the other excuses.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
99. 200,000 Democrats voted for Bush
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 08:43 PM
Mar 2016

That's more than double all the people in the state who voted for Nader.

I know it's real hard for you to realize, but if anyone beyond the Florida GOP and the supreme court is to blame for 2000, it's Democratic voters in Florida.

Response to Coincidence (Reply #25)

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
3. Oh don't worry
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 05:48 PM
Mar 2016

you are the new Nader supporter... and I wish I were kidding.

I find it pathetic, but hey... it is what it is. Now to do some research... on something I really dread, but needs doing and major media will not do it.

See post 1 for textbook example!

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
14. I plan to vote for the nominee
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 05:54 PM
Mar 2016

If that's clinton and she loses, you'll no doubt still blame me.

Oh well.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
22. If you vote for a Democratic candidate, and that candidate loses, how in the world would you
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 05:58 PM
Mar 2016

interpret any kind of blame. Silly scoot. I have never been silly. A lot of stuff, but not silly. You know that. Right? You know that is a silly comment you made. And then tried to make something so silly into a fact with this.... "Oh well." It still is not fact, just some imagination thrown out there by you.

I do not get that.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
55. Because I've seen it before.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:20 PM
Mar 2016

And I'm watching the ground game get set up for it this time around.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
90. Which would be my point. You treated it as an occuring event. Yes, a prediction, guess, whatever.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 07:32 PM
Mar 2016
 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
104. You can be a 1000% certain and no different than a guess. Lol. Which has no certainty.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 09:10 PM
Mar 2016

ok. You can have the last word that when you vote Clinton, and when she loses, I will blame you.

I can carry that on my shoulders scoot, for you.

Bleacher Creature

(11,256 posts)
5. If our people all vote, we win.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 05:48 PM
Mar 2016

If people who are closer to Clinton than they are to Trump stay home or waste their vote on a protest candidate, and we lose because of that, it's on them.

Not sure why this isn't clear.

dana_b

(11,546 posts)
81. " we lose because of that, it's on them."
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 07:05 PM
Mar 2016

Nope! You guys wanted this weak corporatist candidate with more issues surrounding her than you could shake a stick at when we have the most PROGRESSIVE and strong candidate in years - this is on YOU!!!

Not sure why this isn't clear.

Samantha

(9,314 posts)
121. No, it is really not on the voter -- it is on the political party
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 01:00 AM
Mar 2016

What you are talking about is a political point of view. There is something of utmost more importance than a political viewpoint and that is a civil rights viewpoint. There are many people who will not betray their own conscience by voting for someone they perceive to be severely flawed. And if a political party opts to hold out that type of person as its nominee and people do not show up to vote for that nominee, that person is exercising his or her civil right to abstain. Civics 101.

Sam



thereismore

(13,326 posts)
15. One party, yes, but I still retain some values. I am not in lockstep with you.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 05:55 PM
Mar 2016

I assure you I am plenty grown up.

themaguffin

(3,826 posts)
31. It's not about "lockstep" but it's about much more than a candidate
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:04 PM
Mar 2016

it's about policy and Federal and judicial appointments etc.

Response to SoCalMusicLover (Original post)

bobbobbins01

(1,681 posts)
11. Please don't be a defeatist.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 05:53 PM
Mar 2016

The results from last night didn't go that much worse than expected. We knew we would lose FL and NC...2 were really close, but we didn't expect to win by big margins there anyway. The margins were maybe slightly bigger than expected, and actually having a win would have been nice, but numerically this is where the campaign said we'd be(and they've said this since new hampshire).

Yes, its an uphill battle going forward, but its not over, not by a longshot. I think the problem is managing expectations and keeping up momentum. The Michigan win made a lot of people get their hopes too far up too soon. The reality is we have to work harder than hell to see the change we want.

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
18. Did this thread author even read Skinner's recent manifesto ?
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 05:56 PM
Mar 2016

Giving notice that Hillary supporters are now being placed on trial by a Sanders supporter goes against the very spirit of Skinner's manifesto. As if being brutally attacked by Trump over the next 6 months isn't enough.

 

peace13

(11,076 posts)
21. After the primaries in 2008
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 05:58 PM
Mar 2016

Hillary refused to concede. Weeks went by and she set dates for press conferences that she failed to show up at. The Dem's were held hostage after she lost!! Here we are talking how her supporters are trying to force a canidate to concede before the race is done! I tell you, if I knew what all of that was about back then I would agree to vote for her if she is in the GE.

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
23. Attention all Hillary Supporters: ANNOUNCEMENT! ANNOUNCEMENT!
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 05:59 PM
Mar 2016

SoCalMusicLover will hold it against us! You are hereby advised.

That is all.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
48. I'll try not to lose any sleep over that ...
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:11 PM
Mar 2016

... because, as you know, what anonymous strangers on the internet think of me are of utmost importance to me. It's going to be difficult, but I'll cope somehow.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
24. Some people feel it's the voters to blame when a candidate loses
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 05:59 PM
Mar 2016

Oddly enough those are the same ones to give all the credit to the candidate if they win.

I know people who treat God the same way, anything good happens it's God, anything bad and it's anyone but God.

BreakfastClub

(765 posts)
29. Why do you have the assumption that she will "screw" this up? She
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:02 PM
Mar 2016

has not given you any reason to believe that, so it must be for some other reason that you think she will. Hmm.

Peacetrain

(22,875 posts)
40. If a candidate cannot win the primary/caucus of the party they have chosen to run in
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:08 PM
Mar 2016

There is no way they would ever have won or will win the general.. Its a simple as that..

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
42. I don't blame people who support Hillary
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:09 PM
Mar 2016

Right wingers are so over the freaking top with how they go at her it's hard to see the legitimate concerns through them. If she is covered with Right Wing mud how are you gonna see the ugly underneath? There is one big glaring flaw in her vote for the IWR, but most people don't care about foreign policy and even fewer understand the implications. So, banging on that drum is futile. There are the things she lobbied for, bragged about that happened under her husbands administration. But we are supposed to all at once give her credit for the good things and not blame her for the bad. The media is complicit in banging on how historic it would be to have a female President, I am not impressed, but many people are impressed by this. That is their right. Her record just isn't discussed. Her ideas aren't discussed. It's all just she is the presumptive nominee and people get in line because the fear factor says if she isn't the nominee Trump wins.

Stand and Fight

(7,480 posts)
59. Blame yourself.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:32 PM
Mar 2016

If you think that you've such a large revolution and that so many people are on Sanders side, urge them to vote for Hillary rather than staying home. Those numbers combined will defeat whomever the nominee on the GOP side is. If Hillary loses, I will blame you and Sanders people for failing to stop Trump with your YUGE numbers. What good is a revolution if it quits when things get tough, packs its bags, and goes home? Right. It's no good.

Stand and Fight

(7,480 posts)
78. LOL
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 07:04 PM
Mar 2016

It is when you add up the votes. Let's break it down in programming terms...

trumpVotes = 1000
hillaryVotes = 999
ponyUpVotes = 0

if (trumpVotes > hillaryVotes) {
print("Trump wins!&quot ;
}

Rather than voting for Hillary because your candidate lost, Trump wins.

Stand and Fight

(7,480 posts)
123. The horror!
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 06:11 AM
Mar 2016

Whatever should I do with you closing your eyes tight and plugging your ears? Oh noes! To think, my every post on this board, my every activity was for your approval and attention! I am crestfallen! Crestfallen, I say! /sarcasm

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
66. Best case is her administration will surprise you.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 06:46 PM
Mar 2016

You were wrong about Sanders winning, maybe you're wrong about her, too. I'd be the first to consider that than lashing out at those that I need to help push the candidate further to the left.

If you want to give up, that's all on you.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]

Donald Ian Rankin

(13,598 posts)
92. Who's saying not to worry?
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 07:33 PM
Mar 2016

I think Clinton has a better-than-even chance of beating Trump, but anyone who says not to worry at this stage is grossly overoptimistic (although not as grossly as saying that her losing is inevitable is overpessimistic).

What is the case, though, is that Clinton is likely to do better than Sanders would.

In an ideal multiverse we'd be able to run two separate realities where the Democrats nominate Clinton and Sanders, and see who does better. But we can't do that. All we can do is guess, based on the available evidence, which candidate has the better chance.

Essentially the only people who think that Sanders does are people who also thought that he was going to win the primary. That should tell you something about the reliability of their judgement when it comes to the relative strengths of the two candidates.

If Clinton loses, the sensible response will be not to blame Clinton supporters, but to acknowledge is that there was probably no-one running this cycle who could have won (depending on how much more negative campaigning they indulge in between now and then, it may be reasonable to place some of the blame on those Sanders supporters who have tried to damage Clinton's campaign, but probably not much).

 

vintx

(1,748 posts)
109. I've been told more than once on this site that my vote isn't needed.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 09:18 PM
Mar 2016

Once by someone who isn't even an American.

Glad to know I'm not needed, cause I sure as shit couldn't stomach trying to convince others to vote for someone I could never vote for.

smiley

(1,432 posts)
115. No they don't own this...
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 09:45 PM
Mar 2016

Bernie is still in this fight. So am I. Every time I see one of these damn defeatist posts I go back to ActBlue and give another $10. I'm not giving up that easy and I hope that you don't either.

Give a BIG FU to the MSM and their establishment candidates. Trump included.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Clinton & Her Sup...