2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIs intelligence a barrier to voting in your own self interest?
could all the baldface lying and political attacks being pointed at Bernie Sanders supporters and then the campaign and candidate (in this order, more or less, Naderization seems right around the corner)
be directed at less intelligent decision making?
if so, is this an intelligent decision on anyone's part?
or has the Peter Principle won out completely?
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)I don't happen to think Bernie would be a good President. His campaign is showing why that is a correct judgement. BTW The folks in FL that voted for Nader gave us Bush/Cheney and the Iraq War. I'm sure Nader is holed up somewhere hoping Trump wins.
revbones
(3,660 posts)Gore won the popular vote. He failed to argue for a full state recount, and that was the justification that the Supremes used to prevent a limited recount. Had he argued for a full state recount in FL he would have been president - without Nader votes.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)But I'm kind of a bright girl.* I'm certainly not going to be motivated to vote for Bride of Pander Bear by attacks from Hillary acolytes.
*At least the tests say so...never thought that meant much beyond "I'm good at taking tests."