Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 10:10 AM Mar 2016

Is intelligence a barrier to voting in your own self interest?

could all the baldface lying and political attacks being pointed at Bernie Sanders supporters and then the campaign and candidate (in this order, more or less, Naderization seems right around the corner)
be directed at less intelligent decision making?
if so, is this an intelligent decision on anyone's part?
or has the Peter Principle won out completely?

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is intelligence a barrier to voting in your own self interest? (Original Post) reddread Mar 2016 OP
That old meme is so condescending. redstateblues Mar 2016 #1
Technically Nader didn't give us Bush. revbones Mar 2016 #2
blaming Nader is the Moon landing denial of the Democratic party MisterP Mar 2016 #5
Lack of it probably is. Like it's a barrier to so much. Lizzie Poppet Mar 2016 #3
I think you are right . . . .from your posts I think that you actually are a bright girl. pdsimdars Mar 2016 #4

redstateblues

(10,565 posts)
1. That old meme is so condescending.
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 10:22 AM
Mar 2016

I don't happen to think Bernie would be a good President. His campaign is showing why that is a correct judgement. BTW The folks in FL that voted for Nader gave us Bush/Cheney and the Iraq War. I'm sure Nader is holed up somewhere hoping Trump wins.

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
2. Technically Nader didn't give us Bush.
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 10:33 AM
Mar 2016

Gore won the popular vote. He failed to argue for a full state recount, and that was the justification that the Supremes used to prevent a limited recount. Had he argued for a full state recount in FL he would have been president - without Nader votes.

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
3. Lack of it probably is. Like it's a barrier to so much.
Fri Mar 18, 2016, 10:36 AM
Mar 2016

But I'm kind of a bright girl.* I'm certainly not going to be motivated to vote for Bride of Pander Bear by attacks from Hillary acolytes.


*At least the tests say so...never thought that meant much beyond "I'm good at taking tests."

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Is intelligence a barrier...