2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhy do people act like trashing Bernie will make us switch to Hillary?
n/t.
comradebillyboy
(10,128 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Progressive dog
(6,899 posts)HassleCat
(6,409 posts)Resistance is useless. You will be assimilated. If you fail to fall in line, the Trump-appointed Supreme Court will show up at your home in the wee hours, and slash your tires.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Who can't stand the idea that so many actually want democracy and not oligarchy.
They got their stuff, fuck everyone else.
DU, as a real democratic website is going down. Sad to see, isn't it?
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)There's your vote tally right there. They are stating the establishment is so crooked they will not even vote.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)...
Really?
You are going to go with that? If that's the case then he certainly is going to have a hard time winning if his supporters won't vote for him because they are sick of the establishment.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Many more will
Most people don't have a clue about Bernie, When they get a clue and they think there is actually some hope for change, they'll join the revolution. Until then, the establishment is happy they don't vote. If they ever get that clue the establishment will be unhappy they voted.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)I've gotta clue, and I voted for Hillary.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Why did you vote for Hillary?
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)It's the nice thing about America we get to make that choice, and we should probably stop hurling personal insults at others for doing that.
I don't have high hopes for that last part.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)And I've got personal experience to know it.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Bernie was my senator.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)He won the primary there with 86% of the vote. That shows that most Vermonters have a GREAT experience with Bernie.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Of course most Vermonters have a good experience with him, he keeps getting elected.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)By any definition.
Where on earth did you get that?
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Why did you lock that LBN thread?
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)What anti-Bernie screed have I posted? I'll just cut to the chase and give you the answer... NONE.
The assertion that I "hate" Senator Sanders is baseless and just patently false.
And since you know that's true, you have now moved onto trying to start a fight over a locked thread, which was locked with 100% host consensus as of now.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)I get the impression that you hate Bernie. You voted for him, and helped him get elected, but now you don't want to help him or get elected as president.
And I was just wondering what the reason was for locking that post. It seems to be a good news article. So since we are discussing things just thought I'd ask.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Making assumptions isn't going to get you anywhere worth our time.
I'm done here.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)Mudcat
(179 posts)Downwinder
(12,869 posts)their principles and values to others. Says much about them.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)by the majority of posters on this board (and it continues even today), day in and day out, and of telling not only us here but every racial, ethnic, and socio-economic group out there why Hillary Clinton is an evil witch that you should not vote for, how can you even ask such a question?
Honestly, is there some pair of magic glasses everyone has been wearing that have made them immune to such perpetual bashing posts? The bashers appear to have the thinnest skins imaginable.
It's time to get off your unicorns and face reality. And that reality is that if it's okay to criticize Hillary Clinton it's equally okay to criticize Bernie Sanders. Believe it or not, he's not perfect. And not everyone likes him. If your candidate wants to be in this game, he and his supporters need to be able to withstand the heat. And to do it with a modicum of grace.
choie
(4,107 posts)It has been months and months of bashing Bernie since he had the audacity - the effrontery - to challenge Clinton's coronation. His candidacy has hardly been met with "grace" by Clinton supporters.
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)It's not our fault stories keep coming out. It's not our fault she's weak. It's her fault.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,167 posts)nichomachus
(12,754 posts)I came here fairly neutral. I liked Bernie, but last Fall didn't think he had the staying power. I was wrong. Also, I wasn't a big fan or Hillary, but didn't feel strongly. That attitude has changed. A lot of it has to do with learning new things about her shady past. And a lot of it has to do with the attitude of Hillary supporters. I've found them nasty and snide, negative instead of positive,mand extremely thin skinned. If this is the sort of attitude we can expect from a Hillary administration, I don't see that as a hopeful sign.
Her supporters, at least on DU are doing her no favors.
I'm still waiting to see a positive list of her real achievements -- and not job titles and jobs her husband held.
mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)She cosponsored three bills and one was something about naming a park after some dude. The other two were also stupid. It was from an article by Sibel Edmonds. Hillary never took any stance that was even mildly risky. She didn't do anything of note.
I think the idea that she's smart or gets things done is an illusion that she and her supporters continually put out in order to maintain an image. A lot of people buy it. But those people WANT to buy it - they want a reason to justify supporting her.
mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)Their political position is a matter of belief and faith in the magical (D), so even if someone who is basically a republican has the (D) next to their name, that's who they'll follow. Just look at one of the main attacks on Bernie: "He isn't a Democrat!" His positions on issues doesn't matter and neither do Hillary's. She's got the (D). End of discussion.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)us into it. They didn't learn in 2000.
Progressive dog
(6,899 posts)so I guess your lack of support didn't matter.
Progressive dog
(6,899 posts)most trashing is directed against Hillary. I guess many people who support Bernie must think trashing Hillary helps. You should ask them why they think it works.
TheCowsCameHome
(40,167 posts)choie
(4,107 posts)Calling Bernie a racist (not to mention his supporters) is not trashing??? It's vile..
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)And inventing the previously unknown chasm between those who fight for "social justice" and those who fight for "economic justice, even though the groups of supporters of both causes overlap about 85% of the time.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)... will make us switch to Bernie?
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)on the Middle East, on military intervention, on trade, and on economic policy.
I have nothing against her as a person(not really knowing her as a person), and I think she would be a great Supreme Court justice.
NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)The Bernistas on DU have been trashing HRC from day one - just as many of them have trashed Obama and the Dem Party for years.
The result? Obama is serving his second term as POTUS, and HRC will be the Dem nominee in November.
nini
(16,672 posts)Mother of God people - if you can't figure out by yourself why it's important to support the Democratic nominee then you simply do not understand the game of politics. And yes.. it comes down to one big fat game/competition and we must win.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)The establishment of the party has shown to be losers. Obama won on hope for change and after that we lost congress and many state seats.
Now we have a lack of turnout in the vote and the biggest vote getters are the republicans. Given the current track of the party and that means Clinton, we will lose again.
noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)There must be no resistance.
noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)This board is very much still focused on the Primaries not the General Election.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)I believe that is what they are thinking. It seems they don't understand millions of people are in solidly colored states and they can and many do vote 3rd party, I have run into dozens in my state. I think the real reason though is they want us to stay home instead of having to see that some people might just go ahead and vote who they want at the top of the ticket and vote Democrats down ticket. That would be sort of like a NO CONFIDENCE vote and they don't want to see that. Right now I don't know what I am going to do if it becomes a Hillary - little Don match up. Hopefully Bernie gets the nomination and we have a real choice.
2banon
(7,321 posts)on winning the so called "Moderate Conservatives". She's already on the job, and after all it's her people.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)2banon
(7,321 posts)from your lips to the ears of the goddesses. but her advisors are tone deaf and clearly, so is she.
quickesst
(6,280 posts)Preaching with your hand stuck in the cookie jar.