Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:36 PM Mar 2016

Anyone remember the Clinton supporters up in arms about Michigan?

Remember how after one of the biggest upsets in primary history, where nearly all the polls were wrong, how Clinton supporters hysterically alleged election fraud?

Yeah, I don't either.

80 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Anyone remember the Clinton supporters up in arms about Michigan? (Original Post) NuclearDem Mar 2016 OP
They/We didn't. Agschmid Mar 2016 #1
Is it disenfranchisement radical noodle Mar 2016 #5
Caucuses are disenfranchisement. Agschmid Mar 2016 #6
Caucuses don't fairly represent everyone radical noodle Mar 2016 #17
Disenfranchisement is an issue. NuclearDem Mar 2016 #7
Yes they did :) Agschmid Mar 2016 #8
The problem is that only the people who win the elections go to Washington. virtualobserver Mar 2016 #77
Looks like Hillary won't defend voter rights in general if they are pooh poohed in the primaries Land Shark Mar 2016 #79
I sure didn't hear it. Amazing! radical noodle Mar 2016 #2
I demand a full investigation. JaneyVee Mar 2016 #3
Indeed. OilemFirchen Mar 2016 #24
Not ringing a bell. Bleacher Creature Mar 2016 #4
People in Michigan weren't falsely told that they weren't Registered Democrats Eric J in MN Mar 2016 #9
Thank you for making my point. NuclearDem Mar 2016 #11
What is your point? NT Eric J in MN Mar 2016 #13
Exactly. Cha Mar 2016 #70
Perhaps they weren't radical noodle Mar 2016 #18
And that's why their affiliation was mysteriously dchill Mar 2016 #56
They should have documentation from their registration radical noodle Mar 2016 #62
Did Michigan have the same problems with voter registration errors and provisional ballots? Bjorn Against Mar 2016 #10
Improving ballot access is a noble goal. geek tragedy Mar 2016 #12
I complained loudly about problems with the caucus in my state as well, a caucus that Bernie won Bjorn Against Mar 2016 #16
Bernie fans are accusing the DNC of stealing votes in AZ geek tragedy Mar 2016 #19
I neer said anything about the DNC Bjorn Against Mar 2016 #26
Of course not. People are dismissing the conspiracy theories geek tragedy Mar 2016 #32
I sure don't see anything in the OP that acknowledges people's legitimate concerns. Bjorn Against Mar 2016 #35
It's not about the legit concerns, it's about the Bernie fans trying to geek tragedy Mar 2016 #36
I did not see any Bernie supporters delegitimizing any votes that were cast Bjorn Against Mar 2016 #39
I'm not dismissing concerns about voter suppression. NuclearDem Mar 2016 #25
A lot of people spoke about Minnesota, I am not an anomoly Bjorn Against Mar 2016 #31
Yes, I understand that. NuclearDem Mar 2016 #15
You seem to care only about the primary but you don't seem to have much concern for democracy Bjorn Against Mar 2016 #22
Have I ever said the election systems in this country were perfect? NuclearDem Mar 2016 #27
Voter suppression has been an issue for years, it did not start in 2016 Bjorn Against Mar 2016 #33
I heard early in the day that Michigan had a ballot shortage in a heavy R B Garr Mar 2016 #14
Remember Hillary fans whining a lot? Yes, me too, every day! Nt Logical Mar 2016 #20
Mic drop workinclasszero Mar 2016 #21
Congratulations on your Arizona victory tazkcmo Mar 2016 #23
No disagreement from me on this one. NuclearDem Mar 2016 #29
Thank you tazkcmo Mar 2016 #34
AZ elections are controlled by the Republican Party not by Dems leftofcool Mar 2016 #49
Not my point at all. tazkcmo Mar 2016 #53
The verdict is in about the character of an overwhelming majority of supporters on both sides. stevenleser Mar 2016 #28
I am sure Hillary appreciates you telling everyone how awful Bernie supporters are Bjorn Against Mar 2016 #37
I don't care what the Sanders supporters here do. I'm telling the truth about how stevenleser Mar 2016 #38
OK, I will make a note that you don't want your candidate to get the votes of any Sanders supporters Bjorn Against Mar 2016 #41
Ok, I will make a note that you don't read what I actually write and make stuff up instead. nt stevenleser Mar 2016 #42
Oh I read what you wrote about what you called "the overwhelming majortiy of supporters" Bjorn Against Mar 2016 #44
If Sanders supporters here didn't want to be called out for bad behavior, they shouldn't have stevenleser Mar 2016 #45
Well thank you mother for correcting our bad behavior Bjorn Against Mar 2016 #48
You're welcome, see, that wasn't so hard. Acknowledge bad behavior among stevenleser Mar 2016 #51
Thank you for the lecture, I know it is very important that you have the opportunity to scold people Bjorn Against Mar 2016 #55
P.s. Bernie also goes on Fox, so if you don't want to be a hypocrite, you need to endorse stevenleser Mar 2016 #43
I did not say you were wrong to go on Fox, you are wrong because you can't even debate them properly Bjorn Against Mar 2016 #47
Nice attempt to move the goalposts. Completely unconvincing but I see you out some stevenleser Mar 2016 #50
What goalposts? When did I say you were wrong to go on Fox? Bjorn Against Mar 2016 #52
Some counter-examples hellofromreddit Mar 2016 #57
Nope, one offs. Not representative. nt stevenleser Mar 2016 #58
Your response is not a one-off hellofromreddit Mar 2016 #61
did you feel that way about clinton supporters noiretextatique Mar 2016 #78
No. LisaM Mar 2016 #30
I don't either.... chillfactor Mar 2016 #40
Strange workinclasszero Mar 2016 #46
I noticed a few trolls outed themselves tonight.. Thats always fun to watch. hrmjustin Mar 2016 #54
Yeah, I'm having a blast watching you. BeanMusical Mar 2016 #63
Me and my shadow. hrmjustin Mar 2016 #64
Is shadow a code name for sockpuppet? BeanMusical Mar 2016 #65
Unlike others i don't use sockpuppets. hrmjustin Mar 2016 #66
To be disappointed by you I would need to have expectations, kid. BeanMusical Mar 2016 #67
Rest well. hrmjustin Mar 2016 #68
Thank you! BeanMusical Mar 2016 #69
Your interlocutor is not a sockpuppet. You should apologize to him. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2016 #75
Where did I say that he was a sockpuppet? BeanMusical Mar 2016 #80
Wait, wait, I'm trying to recall...no, don't think so. Surya Gayatri Mar 2016 #59
Feel the Bern. nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #60
Not our style. We were just glad Hilary came so close and went on the WIN Super Tuesday! Cha Mar 2016 #71
I remember the Clinton supporters who endlessly argued that Bernie's win didn't count Ken Burch Mar 2016 #72
Bernie has zero access to tk2kewl Mar 2016 #73
k&r bigtree Mar 2016 #74
Did you have the same election day problems in Michigan? highprincipleswork Mar 2016 #76

radical noodle

(7,997 posts)
17. Caucuses don't fairly represent everyone
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:50 PM
Mar 2016

I don't understand why some states use them. I see Utah hasn't documented that all the caucus voters are properly registered, so they're still going to have to go through them and check each one for registration. Good grief.

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
7. Disenfranchisement is an issue.
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:42 PM
Mar 2016

And Arizona really needs to get its act together as far as running elections is concerned.

But even so, 250k people voted early in Arizona, and they overwhelming voted for Clinton.

 

virtualobserver

(8,760 posts)
77. The problem is that only the people who win the elections go to Washington.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:12 AM
Mar 2016

Why tamper with the system that elected them, whether it is about changing our voting laws or getting money out of politics.

The Republican strategy of reducing polling places in Democratic strongholds and reducing opportunities for early voting , and the lack of oversight in terms of touchscreen voting are all great concerns.

Once the elections are over, though.....nobody gives a shit.







Bleacher Creature

(11,254 posts)
4. Not ringing a bell.
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:39 PM
Mar 2016

There's something about the results that typically generate claims of election fraud here. I just wish I could put my finger on what it is . . .

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
9. People in Michigan weren't falsely told that they weren't Registered Democrats
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:43 PM
Mar 2016

...didn't have to wait in line for 4 hours, weren't given provisional ballots, and didn't have their votes counted by a private company.

radical noodle

(7,997 posts)
18. Perhaps they weren't
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:52 PM
Mar 2016

Since it's a closed primary, if they registered as Independents, they would not be able to vote.

dchill

(38,450 posts)
56. And that's why their affiliation was mysteriously
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:55 AM
Mar 2016

changed to independent. In some cases, Republican.

radical noodle

(7,997 posts)
62. They should have documentation from their registration
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 01:20 AM
Mar 2016

That should be enough to prove it and get their provisional ballots counted. At least I hope so.

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
10. Did Michigan have the same problems with voter registration errors and provisional ballots?
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:43 PM
Mar 2016

You do understand that different states handle elections differently do you not? The election was not conducted the same way in Michigan as it was in Arizona. It seems pretty ridiculous to suggest that because there were no concerns raised about one election there should be no concerns raised about a completely different election.

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
16. I complained loudly about problems with the caucus in my state as well, a caucus that Bernie won
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:50 PM
Mar 2016

It is not about who won, it is about the fact that people's votes were suppressed.

I am sick of crap like the OP that dismisses legitimate concerns about voter suppression, it is a real issue and dismissing people as conspiracy theorists if they speak out is disgusting. People need to raise hell when the vote is suppressed and it is undemocratic to dismiss their concerns.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
19. Bernie fans are accusing the DNC of stealing votes in AZ
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:52 PM
Mar 2016

Despite the fact the state government runs the election.

So that is what is going on in this forum.

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
26. I neer said anything about the DNC
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:57 PM
Mar 2016

The fact that a few Bernie fans were incorrect about a certain fact however does not make it OK to dismiss legitimate concerns about the fact that a lot of people ran into problems at the poling booths today.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
32. Of course not. People are dismissing the conspiracy theories
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:03 AM
Mar 2016

about Debbie Wasserman-Schultz stealing the Arizona primary.

They are not dismissing those legitimately concerned with disenfranchisement.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
36. It's not about the legit concerns, it's about the Bernie fans trying to
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:14 AM
Mar 2016

delegitimize the votes that were cast.

Which they did for Iowa. And Nevada. And Massachusetts.

Bernie fans are hijacking the issue of voting rights in order to invalidate the will of the voters--that is what this is targeting.

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
39. I did not see any Bernie supporters delegitimizing any votes that were cast
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:22 AM
Mar 2016

The complaints I have seen raised were about the failures of the registration process that forced people to cast provisional ballots that will not be counted for a while as well long lines.

Those are not complaints about votes cast, it is a complaint about people being denied the ability to cast a vote.

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
25. I'm not dismissing concerns about voter suppression.
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:56 PM
Mar 2016

The caucus system, as far as I'm concerned, is one of the most undemocratic election systems to exist in this country.

My point is that claims of voter suppression tend to almost only exist in states where Sanders loses, and given other patterns of behavior, they have little to do with actual suppression, and everything to do with attempting to overturn a result they didn't like. I know you spoke out about Minnesota, but that was an anomaly.

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
31. A lot of people spoke about Minnesota, I am not an anomoly
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:03 AM
Mar 2016

Voter suppression has been a big issue in recent years, these concerns started long before Bernie got into the race and it will continue to be an issue long after he leaves.

Your claim that this is all about Bernie supporters is absolute bullshit, many of us have cared about voter suppression for years. That is why we fought against voter ID laws and have tried to get automatic voter registration and expanded voting roghts. For you to suggest it is all about Bernie shows your ignorance as to how long this has been an issue, it did not start in 2016.

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
15. Yes, I understand that.
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:48 PM
Mar 2016

The point I'm making is that Sanders is going to continue to lose in large states, especially ones with closed primaries, so long as his supporters keep chalking up his losses to some mythical "election fraud."

Sanders wasn't going to win Arizona even if the election system worked absolutely perfectly. It was a closed primary where hundreds of thousands had made up their minds well ahead of time, and where the Clintons have had a strong network since the 90s.

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
22. You seem to care only about the primary but you don't seem to have much concern for democracy
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:55 PM
Mar 2016

The issues being raised in Arizona are serious issues that are effecting people's right to vote, but you seem more concerned about your candidate than you do about voting rights.

I am in Minnesota and our caucuses were a huge mess and extremely undemocratic, Bernie won by a big margin but I still called out the undemocratic nature of the caucuses. If you had any integrity you would call out voter suppression when your candidate wins as well.

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
27. Have I ever said the election systems in this country were perfect?
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:59 PM
Mar 2016

I live in a state with voter ID laws on the books--actual voter suppression.

The allegations of "voter suppression" out of places like Massachusetts and Nevada have nothing to do with any regard for democracy. They have everything to do with a certain candidate's supporters being sore losers.

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
33. Voter suppression has been an issue for years, it did not start in 2016
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:09 AM
Mar 2016

As much as you may want to pretend this is all about those bad Bernie supporters there has been a lot of concerns expressed about the integrity of the vote for years. There have also been a lot of people like you who dismiss legitimate concerns as if they were all coming from sore losers. If people would actually listen to concerns about voter suppression rather than instantly assuming the people expressing those concerns were sore losers maybe something could be done to fix the broken system.

R B Garr

(16,950 posts)
14. I heard early in the day that Michigan had a ballot shortage in a heavy
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:47 PM
Mar 2016

Clinton county, so I expected some big discrepancies.

But I didn't blame it on Sanders or his supporters or Wall Street or 1%'ers or a rigged economy or oligarchs or Jane Sanders or Walmart or Obama.....

tazkcmo

(7,300 posts)
23. Congratulations on your Arizona victory
Tue Mar 22, 2016, 11:55 PM
Mar 2016

No complaints about fraud or illegalities. Again, congratulations.

I do hope you all would agree that Arizona's and several other states' elections were less than professional and far from a standard that the "leader of the free world" should approve of. From reducing polling places to 60 from 200, denying poorer residents of nearby polling places, stringent ID laws to running out of ballots, our elections seem to be very poorly run. Then there's the separate but related issue of voting machines and lack of transparency.

I hope we can all agree to press the Democratic Party to adopt a plank in the platform that calls for a serious and thorough upgrade to our election process to eliminate the above mentioned issues.

I am in no way trying to insinuate that Sec Clinton's victory in Arizona was helped due to the poor running of the election there. I believe she may have lost some votes as did any other Democratic candidate as these problems effect poor minorities more severely than affluent whites. We all know some of it is done just for this reason. But some is just shitty administration of the event itself.

Again, congratulations on the big win.

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
29. No disagreement from me on this one.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:00 AM
Mar 2016

The election system in this country needs a serious overhaul, as far as I'm concerned.

Thank you for the congratulations, and a preemptive congratulations from me for what looks like to be a good seven contests for Bernie.

tazkcmo

(7,300 posts)
34. Thank you
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:10 AM
Mar 2016

We all get very emotional and passionate during primary season and in some ways it's even fun. Sometimes it really sucks, too. I know I'm guilty of being an ass at times. Having said that, I was confident when posting that congratulations post (Which I mean) that we could agree on this point.

Also, thank you for your preemptive congratulations. I hope it turns out that way, of course.

Anyway, congrats again and after we're done bashing each others' brains out in this election, let's all get together and clean this election mess up. The neighbors can see it and it's embarrassing!

tazkcmo

(7,300 posts)
53. Not my point at all.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:51 AM
Mar 2016

I want world class, above board, transparent, enabling, envy of the world elections. I hope you do, too.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
28. The verdict is in about the character of an overwhelming majority of supporters on both sides.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:00 AM
Mar 2016

One side has an over abundance of nasty, bullying, bitter, sore losing supporters, and the other just doesn't.

You're right, we Clinton supporters did not behave this way, not about New Hampshire, not about Michigan, not about any of Sanders wins. Oh I am sure there were one offs, but that's not close to a majority of us or even a significant number of us.

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
37. I am sure Hillary appreciates you telling everyone how awful Bernie supporters are
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:18 AM
Mar 2016

I am sure attacking Bernie supporters constantly like you do is going to be very helpful to Hillary if she wins the nomination and needs Bernie supporters to come to her side.

If you think you are helping your candidate in the slightest bit you are sorely mistaken.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
38. I don't care what the Sanders supporters here do. I'm telling the truth about how
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:20 AM
Mar 2016

They behaved and they can vote Jill Stein or stay home for all I care. All the Sanders supporters in DU won't stop Hillary from winning the General election.

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
41. OK, I will make a note that you don't want your candidate to get the votes of any Sanders supporters
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:26 AM
Mar 2016

If you think your candidate can win the general election without the support of Bernie supporters you have the right to believe that, but it is pretty clear that your political analysis is just as shallow as that of the people you debate on Fox News.

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
44. Oh I read what you wrote about what you called "the overwhelming majortiy of supporters"
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:34 AM
Mar 2016

It just so happens that what you said about "the overwhelming majority" of Bernie supporters was very insulting. You said we could all vote for Jill Stein or stay home, if you think that helps your candidate it is your choice to think that way just don't think it makes you an asset to your candidate.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
45. If Sanders supporters here didn't want to be called out for bad behavior, they shouldn't have
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:37 AM
Mar 2016

behaved that way.

Everything else is you pretending that DU members can swing the election. Which we can't.

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
48. Well thank you mother for correcting our bad behavior
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:46 AM
Mar 2016

I am sure glad that you are so well behaved that you would never engage in things like name calling like calling people "Bernie Bros".

You are so well behaved that you need to set the example for everyone else don't you.

P.S. Not all Bernie supporters are on DU, nor are all the attacks that have been made against Bernie supporters been on DU. You and the people making arguments like yours on other sites are turning off Bernie supporters across the nation. If you think it helps your candidate it shows how little you understand about politics.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
51. You're welcome, see, that wasn't so hard. Acknowledge bad behavior among
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:48 AM
Mar 2016

Your fellow Sanders supporters, acknowledge that Bernibros is a real problem and you are on your way. Sanders himself acknowledged that Berniebros were an issue so you're only following his leadership.

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
55. Thank you for the lecture, I know it is very important that you have the opportunity to scold people
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:53 AM
Mar 2016

You might have a bit more credibility if you actually behaved the way you expect others to behave however.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
43. P.s. Bernie also goes on Fox, so if you don't want to be a hypocrite, you need to endorse
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:30 AM
Mar 2016

Hillary now!

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
47. I did not say you were wrong to go on Fox, you are wrong because you can't even debate them properly
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:40 AM
Mar 2016

If you go on Fox you should at least try to come up with some decent arguments to debate them with. When the best argument you can come up with is name calling by using the word "Berniebros" over and over again it shows you don't have a real argument and you are just as shallow as the people you debate on Fox.

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
52. What goalposts? When did I say you were wrong to go on Fox?
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:50 AM
Mar 2016

I never did, what I said is that you are as shallow as the people you debate on Fox. Unless you were debating Bernie Sanders then Bernie had nothing to do with what I said about your appearances on Fox.

 

hellofromreddit

(1,182 posts)
61. Your response is not a one-off
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 01:14 AM
Mar 2016

This website is quite full of people who are acutely aware of the behavior of others yet blind to their own--even when confronted with it.

LisaM

(27,794 posts)
30. No.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:01 AM
Mar 2016

The issue in Michigan was a really faulty polling model, independents criss crossing sll over the place, and Dems voting for Kasich to stop Trump.

BeanMusical

(4,389 posts)
67. To be disappointed by you I would need to have expectations, kid.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 01:40 AM
Mar 2016

And now I have to go to bed so we'll continue to play another time m'kay?

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
72. I remember the Clinton supporters who endlessly argued that Bernie's win didn't count
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 06:12 AM
Mar 2016

because it was an open primary. Never mind that they would have insisted the same state's results were totally valid if HRC had won, as ever poll had predicted she would.

There was plenty of bad sportsmanship on your side about Michigan.

 

tk2kewl

(18,133 posts)
73. Bernie has zero access to
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 08:43 AM
Mar 2016

The political machines (and i don't mean the voting machines) that can be used to rig the vote.

Clinton on the other hand has the full power of the establishment behind her

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Anyone remember the Clint...