2016 Postmortem

Uncle Joe

(58,349 posts) Wed Mar 23, 2016, 02:25 AM Mar 2016

I believe CNN has quit covering the votes being counted in Arizona, Utah and Idaho.

I never saw the first vote count in Idaho.

They don't even depict crawlers reflecting the votes as they come in.

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I believe CNN has quit covering the votes being counted in Arizona, Utah and Idaho. (Original Post) Uncle Joe Mar 2016 OP

Here is a good site. RandySF Mar 2016 #1

Thanks for the link, RandySF Uncle Joe Mar 2016 #2

CNN just called Utah for Cruz. nt greyl Mar 2016 #3

Now projecting Idaho win for Sanders! greyl Mar 2016 #6

People STILL IN LINE Waiting To Vote...Have been Waiting For HOURS! AzDar Mar 2016 #4

I have no words, that's just tragic. Uncle Joe Mar 2016 #5

Disgraceful. Cannot BELIEVE MSM 'called ' it hours ago...Beyond irresponsible... AzDar Mar 2016 #8

Utah 74.2 Sanders, 25 Clinton, Idaho Sanders 78, Clinton 21.2 slipslidingaway Mar 2016 #7

Something doesn't add up. DLnyc Mar 2016 #9

^This. AzDar Mar 2016 #10

Hey Joe! They're still counting in AZ and Utah, but so far ... ebayfool Mar 2016 #11

RandySF

(58,755 posts)

1. Here is a good site.

Reply to Uncle Joe (Original post)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 02:26 AM

Mar 2016

http://www.decisiondeskhq.com

Uncle Joe

(58,349 posts)

2. Thanks for the link, RandySF

Reply to RandySF (Reply #1)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 02:27 AM

Mar 2016

greyl

(22,990 posts)

3. CNN just called Utah for Cruz. nt

Reply to Uncle Joe (Original post)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 02:27 AM

Mar 2016

greyl

(22,990 posts)

6. Now projecting Idaho win for Sanders!

Reply to greyl (Reply #3)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 02:34 AM

Mar 2016

Nice of them to break in to the International coverage.

AzDar

(14,023 posts)

4. People STILL IN LINE Waiting To Vote...Have been Waiting For HOURS!

Reply to Uncle Joe (Original post)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 02:29 AM

Mar 2016

https://twitter.com/Clifak/status/712526224753565696

Uncle Joe

(58,349 posts)

5. I have no words, that's just tragic.

Reply to AzDar (Reply #4)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 02:31 AM

Mar 2016

AzDar

(14,023 posts)

8. Disgraceful. Cannot BELIEVE MSM 'called ' it hours ago...Beyond irresponsible...

Reply to Uncle Joe (Reply #5)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 02:35 AM

Mar 2016

And doesn't seem quite right, either...

slipslidingaway

(21,210 posts)

7. Utah 74.2 Sanders, 25 Clinton, Idaho Sanders 78, Clinton 21.2

Reply to Uncle Joe (Original post)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 02:34 AM

Mar 2016

https://www.washingtonpost.com/2016-election-results/idaho/

http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/utah

DLnyc

(2,479 posts)

9. Something doesn't add up.

Reply to Uncle Joe (Original post)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 02:35 AM

Mar 2016

on edit: oops, i meant to reply to #1, sorry!

NYT site has essentially the same vote count in Maricopa county, but calls it 555 out of 724 precincts reporting, but the site you linked to, Decision Desk, calls it 100% reporting. And NYT site vote really hasn't moved as they've gone, over several hours, from 1 out of 724 to 555 out of 724. Meanwhile, how can 100% be reporting while people are still (or were recently still) on line to vote?

AzDar

(14,023 posts)

10. ^This.

Reply to DLnyc (Reply #9)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 02:36 AM

Mar 2016

ebayfool

(3,411 posts)

11. Hey Joe! They're still counting in AZ and Utah, but so far ...

Reply to Uncle Joe (Original post)

Wed Mar 23, 2016, 02:41 AM

Mar 2016

Ariz. 75 del. Idaho 23 Utah 33
Hillary Clinton 59% 21% 25%
Bernie Sanders 38% 78% 74%

Reporting 76% 100% 15%

Reply to this discussion