Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
72 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I see a bunch of angry conspiracy theories and petitions and protests! What on earth happened?! (Original Post) DanTex Mar 2016 OP
Millionaires Billionaires Oligarchs bravenak Mar 2016 #1
oh my! MoonRiver Mar 2016 #16
That is very true NWCorona Mar 2016 #44
Those mind-reading poll workers again!!! MADem Mar 2016 #2
Actually it is a lot easier than that fasttense Mar 2016 #8
No. This was a DEMOCRATIC (not "RepubliCON") Presidential Preference Election. MADem Mar 2016 #13
NO kidding?? There was a Democratic Primary? Really? The way the media talks about tRump fasttense Mar 2016 #56
It still doesn't "explain" how Sanders lost and would have won "if only." MADem Mar 2016 #68
It varies by state Retrograde Mar 2016 #69
Cue the X Files theme song. Conspiracies abound. redstateblues Mar 2016 #3
Episode 322, The Missing Arizona Revolutionaries Hortensis Mar 2016 #71
What happened? vintx Mar 2016 #4
Welcome to DU! grossproffit Mar 2016 #7
. stonecutter357 Mar 2016 #23
They won't be laughing so hard when she's indicted. Cobalt Violet Mar 2016 #31
Hold your breath until that happens...! MADem Mar 2016 #70
Aren't you just so adorable. Dr Hobbitstein Mar 2016 #41
There there CorkySt.Clair Mar 2016 #43
Hillary should have received a lot more votes. grossproffit Mar 2016 #5
Yeah, when you supress ALL the vote you get the most conservative candidate fasttense Mar 2016 #9
Bernie is winning the non people of color vote. Hillary is winning true Democrats, diverse voters. grossproffit Mar 2016 #14
Just curious what are true Democrats? gordianot Mar 2016 #34
Those who support and belong to the Democratic party. grossproffit Mar 2016 #45
Since I as a non person of color has supported and belonged to the Democratic Party for 48 years. gordianot Mar 2016 #49
Good luck to you and all the True Democrats in the GE. frylock Mar 2016 #58
Thanks! oldandhappy Mar 2016 #53
Bill Clinton personally blockaded 1.7 million people. Bleacher Creature Mar 2016 #6
It's a lot easier than that. fasttense Mar 2016 #10
One "superdelegate" is worth way more than 1.7 million voters though for the New Dems & Bill bobthedrummer Mar 2016 #65
Bernie can't lose! rjsquirrel Mar 2016 #11
What stage are we on? nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #12
Between Denial and Anger, I'd say. It's going to be awhile. MADem Mar 2016 #15
I don't know...the petition OP to Schumer smells of bargaining. nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #17
Fair point...but I think Utah and Idaho pushed them back a few MADem Mar 2016 #26
Saul is still wandering about, definitely....but there's a definite change this am. nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #29
We are going to have to tolerate this for as long as Ted Devine wants a payday, I suspect. MADem Mar 2016 #32
Tad Devine does not win elections. nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #33
Really! I don't think BS is gettting bang for his buck. MADem Mar 2016 #37
oh somebody's getting a Bang out of it...nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #46
You are so right about Tad not winning elections--at least Presidential oness. MADem Mar 2016 #72
Denial and Anger is Bernies platform Renew Deal Mar 2016 #20
It's brilliant scheme-making promises he knows he can't keep redstateblues Mar 2016 #24
"Fight the Power!" sounds great...except that this guy wants to BE the power! nt MADem Mar 2016 #27
I can tell from the board today....we are moving towards bargaining. nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #28
Is delusional a stage? grossproffit Mar 2016 #22
Generally, it's part of denial, but you see it in the bargaining phase, too. nt msanthrope Mar 2016 #25
Temper Tantrum, so I think its the anger part and going into denial or is it the other uponit7771 Mar 2016 #47
Sums it up well Renew Deal Mar 2016 #18
K&R! stonecutter357 Mar 2016 #19
There are no conspiracies just business as usual. gordianot Mar 2016 #21
The Sanders folks have implemented their end game strategy 72DejaVu Mar 2016 #30
I really do not see how Sanders people would destroy the Democratic Party? gordianot Mar 2016 #35
All these crackpot conspiracy theories 72DejaVu Mar 2016 #36
The point is the NSA, FBI and DOJ are not crackpot conspirators these days they know the truth. gordianot Mar 2016 #39
The Sanders folks-is that a new alternative band??? The New Dems took the Party to hell long ago. bobthedrummer Mar 2016 #64
Voting rights should be sacred. mmonk Mar 2016 #38
What happened was Hillary voters were turned away from voting. She may have won even more delegates. jillan Mar 2016 #40
Exactly, it is scary how easy it is to stifle intellectual curiosity. N/T gordianot Mar 2016 #42
Making shit up isn't intellectual at all uponit7771 Mar 2016 #48
Asking questions is intellectual and if answers come they may not be what you expect. gordianot Mar 2016 #50
I know what's going on Setsuna1972 Mar 2016 #51
My bet: The Clinton Machine happened. polichick Mar 2016 #52
Both Clinton and Sanders voters experienced election fraud. oldandhappy Mar 2016 #54
Theft NowSam Mar 2016 #55
From the 2008 thread 'Hillary's Nonsensical, Historical Excuse for RFK Assassination Crack'' here's Bluenorthwest Mar 2016 #57
3/09/ 2016 Hillary Clinton "I am not a natural politician". gordianot Mar 2016 #60
We've established that some of Hillary's more ardent supporters hated her in 2008. frylock Mar 2016 #61
It's going to be fun watching you guys get all wadded when repubs pull this against dems in the GE. frylock Mar 2016 #59
Actually...the Clinton campaign was smart enough to bank it's votes during the Early Voting period. brooklynite Mar 2016 #67
It's really showing up the naivete about the system treestar Mar 2016 #62
Yuck. Gloating, bullying and arrogance is so ugly. nt. polly7 Mar 2016 #63
I think this place is going to become very unpleasant until at least the NY Primary. brooklynite Mar 2016 #66

MADem

(135,425 posts)
2. Those mind-reading poll workers again!!!
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:13 AM
Mar 2016

They're able to figure out which Democrats are Clinton supporters, by a secret hand sign, and they are given a ballot and told to go cast their vote.

The ones who don't know the Super Secret Crafty Clinton Code, though ... why, They Shall Not Vote!!

 

fasttense

(17,301 posts)
8. Actually it is a lot easier than that
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:21 AM
Mar 2016

RepubliCONS have known about this trick for years. If you suppress ALL the votes, the likely outcome is that the status quo and conservative candidate will win. It takes effort to change, the status quo requires merely swimming with the tide.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
13. No. This was a DEMOCRATIC (not "RepubliCON") Presidential Preference Election.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:28 AM
Mar 2016

It was established so the DEMOCRATS (not the Independents, Greens or Socialists--or those "RepubliCONs" of which you speak) of Arizona could tell their party leadership which candidate THEY preferred.

Here's the "trick" to not being disenfranchised in a DEMOCRATIC Presidential Preference Election in Arizona--you have to Be A Democrat. And you have to BE one for more than a month, to have locked in your party affiliation a month ahead of the election. If you did it late, or not at all, you are excluded.

That's how it works.

No Clinton voters are complaining of disenfranchisement. That's because the overwhelming majority of Clinton voters are .... (surprise) .... Democrats.

 

fasttense

(17,301 posts)
56. NO kidding?? There was a Democratic Primary? Really? The way the media talks about tRump
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:11 PM
Mar 2016

even Rachel Maddow sounds like a RepubliCON.

But all kidding aside, I hate to tell you but your State runs your elections NOT YOUR DEMOCRATIC PARTY. The open and closed primary decisions are made at the state level NOT necessarily by Democrats. The decisions of how candidates are listed on the ballot are made by the state NOT necessarily Democrats. This year my State RepubliCON Senate decided you can no longer just vote a straight Democratic ticket. You have to go through and press the button for each Democratic or RepubliCON person you vote for. So when names are moved and changed and reloaded on new voter rolls, that's all done by your state NOT YOUR DEMOCRATIC PARTY.

If you Suppress ALL the Votes then the Status Quo usually wins. Thus Hillary voters who are for the status quo are less likely to complain. It's in their best interest to keep quiet.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
68. It still doesn't "explain" how Sanders lost and would have won "if only."
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 02:33 PM
Mar 2016

We're still back to the Super Secret Hand Signal.

Unless, of course, Clinton voters are just more dedicated and have more stick-to-it-ive-ness.

Retrograde

(10,128 posts)
69. It varies by state
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 02:58 PM
Mar 2016

In mine - California - the parties do decide who gets to vote in the presidential primaries (we went to open primaries for all other offices a few years ago, so come June all voters will be able to vote in the Senate and Congressional primaries, but only registered Republicans can vote in the presidential primary; the Democratic, Libertarian and American Independent parties chose this time to let Non-Partisan voters vote in their presidential primaries). The state runs the mechanics of the election, but in this case the party decides who votes. Other states do things differently.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
71. Episode 322, The Missing Arizona Revolutionaries
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 03:13 PM
Mar 2016

Cue screams of incredible agony out of sight, then cut cameras to



Oh, god, no, no, no!!!

 

vintx

(1,748 posts)
4. What happened?
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:17 AM
Mar 2016

A third way corporatist war hawk liar is about to be held up as the leader of this once proud party. That's what happened.

I guess the third way types just really wanted to split the party.

grossproffit

(5,591 posts)
5. Hillary should have received a lot more votes.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:18 AM
Mar 2016

I just spoke with 5 friends this morning, all in Maricopa county who were turned away because they were mislabeled as Independents in the system. All of them are Clinton supporters. They phoned the county yesterday and will be calling today as well. They're pissed. They met a lot of fellow angry Clinton supporters who were also turned away.

 

fasttense

(17,301 posts)
9. Yeah, when you supress ALL the vote you get the most conservative candidate
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:26 AM
Mar 2016

That's what RepubliCONS have been doing for years. It's just preparation by RepubliCONS for the general election.

gordianot

(15,232 posts)
34. Just curious what are true Democrats?
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:55 AM
Mar 2016

Would that include the DNC and official party organizations or are certain people truer Democrats than others? How does one become a true Democrat?

gordianot

(15,232 posts)
49. Since I as a non person of color has supported and belonged to the Democratic Party for 48 years.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 11:37 AM
Mar 2016

I too might be a "true Democrat" add to that I really believe in diversity.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
58. Good luck to you and all the True Democrats in the GE.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 01:09 PM
Mar 2016

You'll need 100% of the 30% of voters who are True Democrats to pull it off. Should be a walk in the cake for your beloved candidate.

Bleacher Creature

(11,250 posts)
6. Bill Clinton personally blockaded 1.7 million people.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:18 AM
Mar 2016

All Sanders supporters, and none of them were able to get to the voting booth.

 

bobthedrummer

(26,083 posts)
65. One "superdelegate" is worth way more than 1.7 million voters though for the New Dems & Bill
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 01:24 PM
Mar 2016

Just ask Mary Jo White

Bill Clinton pardon controversy (Wikipedia)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton_pardon_controversy

MADem

(135,425 posts)
26. Fair point...but I think Utah and Idaho pushed them back a few
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:41 AM
Mar 2016

moves on their road to Damascus...!

MADem

(135,425 posts)
37. Really! I don't think BS is gettting bang for his buck.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:30 AM
Mar 2016

$810,000 -- That's how much Tad took in from the Sanders campaign, for his little firm -- just this month.


$810,000 divided by $27 is 30,000. If they're going to keep on at this rate, they'll need 30K more "little guy" donations for April.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
72. You are so right about Tad not winning elections--at least Presidential oness.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 03:18 PM
Mar 2016

Carter re-election campaign...?

Mondale...?

Dukakis...?

Gore....? (Well, he squeaked that one out, but he should have bought some anti-Nader ads in FL)

Kerry....?


How he stays in business is anyone's guess.

uponit7771

(90,301 posts)
47. Temper Tantrum, so I think its the anger part and going into denial or is it the other
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 11:25 AM
Mar 2016

... way around

gordianot

(15,232 posts)
21. There are no conspiracies just business as usual.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:38 AM
Mar 2016

You may like it, you may be appalled, you may be saddened by loss of life, you may look at it as revenge, deserved, innocent, powerless, omnipotent as the wheel turns accept your fate. If you try to figure out what happened keep it to yourself and know you will not be the master of your own destiny. Try not to complain no one wants to listen, remember poor Job was the victim of high stakes gamblers. Shit happens and it is just business as usual. Get over it.

72DejaVu

(1,545 posts)
30. The Sanders folks have implemented their end game strategy
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 09:47 AM
Mar 2016

They will destroy the Democratic Party in order to save it.

gordianot

(15,232 posts)
35. I really do not see how Sanders people would destroy the Democratic Party?
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:21 AM
Mar 2016

Sanders most likely will not win the nomination. Most of his followers will get over it Sanders and Clinton will reconcile. Trump is just too scary.

A major FBI probe mishandling secret files, DOJ indictment could really mess up the Democratic Party even if the allegations are untrue now that is a threat. Like some say I am sick of listening to contrived email controversy but it is still out there and the existence of a private server with Top Secret correspondence is illegal. If that server was really breached watch out. An indictment of a candidate would mess up the Democratic party. At this point I do not care who the Democratic candidate will be as long as they beat Trump and Cruz.

72DejaVu

(1,545 posts)
36. All these crackpot conspiracy theories
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:27 AM
Mar 2016

Are intended to create the impression with the general public that Clinton did not win the nomination fairly, and supplement the right wing meme that she is untrustworthy.

It's a scorched earth strategy. If Bernie can't have the nomination, make the nomination not worth having. Maybe Trump will make things so bad that millions of people will join the "revolution".

gordianot

(15,232 posts)
39. The point is the NSA, FBI and DOJ are not crackpot conspirators these days they know the truth.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:53 AM
Mar 2016

Hillary's real problems are with the NSA over any secret correspondence on that server and not Benghazi hearings brought on by right-wing political hacks. The two email controversies are easy to confuse. Add the person who set up the server has immunity the details are now well known.

Also revolutions against Fascist regimes do not have good track records. I rate the equal potential for Trump and or Cruz to go full blown fascist. Hope I am wrong.

jillan

(39,451 posts)
40. What happened was Hillary voters were turned away from voting. She may have won even more delegates.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 10:55 AM
Mar 2016

Do you understand now?

gordianot

(15,232 posts)
50. Asking questions is intellectual and if answers come they may not be what you expect.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 11:45 AM
Mar 2016

The point of my response was voting irregularities may have hurt Hillary. What irregularities occurred, what happens if they show up in the general election?

NowSam

(1,252 posts)
55. Theft
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:05 PM
Mar 2016

It was stolen with cooperation from the corporate controlled everything. Theft. Do we want a thief in chief? Commander in Thief. Get ready for the ugliest period in history since Dubya.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
57. From the 2008 thread 'Hillary's Nonsensical, Historical Excuse for RFK Assassination Crack'' here's
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 12:49 PM
Mar 2016

DanTex:

"Great post.

Edited on Sun May-25-08 12:53 PM by DanTex
The problem is that Hillary rarely actually "means" any of the things she says. It's basically all spin and PR.

I mean, almost every single word out of her mouth during that whole statement was obvious BS:

-It's not "unprecedented in history" for candidates to withdraw (or to be urged to withdraw) for party unity. For example, the Reps urged Huckabee to withdraw for unity just this year.
-Nobody tried to push her out "since Iowa". It only started when she had less than 1% chance of winning without some catastrophe happening to Obama.
-The Obama camp has never suggested that she should drop out.
-She's lying through her teeth when she says "I don't understand" the unity argument -- unless she's completely braindead.
-The Bill Clinton analogy was BS
-The RFK analogy was BS.

100% BS. Did she "mean" any of it? Who knows what is going on in her head.

Maybe she meant it as a double entendre. Her "official" meaning was that RFK was still campaigning. But she was in a particularly bitter mood, so she left the word "assassinated" as a jab."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x6111215

So what you 'see' is just whatever you want to type as narrative. In 08 you could 'see' that Hillary was bitter and full of BS and wrong about everything, today you can 'see' her honesty and integrity and 'see' what's wrong with Bernie and 'see' the future and I'm just not 'seeing' you as a credible commentator at all, because you argue any branch of any tree you lite on is the finest branch and all the other trees are rotten.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
59. It's going to be fun watching you guys get all wadded when repubs pull this against dems in the GE.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 01:12 PM
Mar 2016

bookmarked

brooklynite

(94,302 posts)
67. Actually...the Clinton campaign was smart enough to bank it's votes during the Early Voting period.
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 01:26 PM
Mar 2016

And they'll do the same during the GE.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
62. It's really showing up the naivete about the system
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 01:15 PM
Mar 2016

About registering to vote, vote in primaries, etc.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I see a bunch of angry co...